提交 d3b178ad 编写于 作者: G Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交者: NeilBrown

md: Skip cluster setup for dm-raid

There is a bug that the bitmap superblock isn't initialised properly for
dm-raid, so a new field can have garbage in new fields.
(dm-raid does initialisation in the kernel - md initialised the
 superblock in mdadm).

This means that for dm-raid we cannot currently trust the new ->nodes
field. So:
 - use __GFP_ZERO to initialise the superblock properly for all new
    arrays
 - initialise all fields in bitmap_info in bitmap_new_disk_sb
 - ignore ->nodes for dm arrays (yes, this is a hack)

This bug exposes dm-raid to bug in the (still experimental) md-cluster
code, so it is suitable for -stable.  It does cause crashes.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100491
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v4.1)
Signed-off-By: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
上级 ee5d004f
master alk-4.19.24 alk-4.19.30 alk-4.19.34 alk-4.19.36 alk-4.19.43 alk-4.19.48 alk-4.19.57 ck-4.19.67 ck-4.19.81 ck-4.19.91 github/fork/deepanshu1422/fix-typo-in-comment github/fork/haosdent/fix-typo linux-next v4.19.91 v4.19.90 v4.19.89 v4.19.88 v4.19.87 v4.19.86 v4.19.85 v4.19.84 v4.19.83 v4.19.82 v4.19.81 v4.19.80 v4.19.79 v4.19.78 v4.19.77 v4.19.76 v4.19.75 v4.19.74 v4.19.73 v4.19.72 v4.19.71 v4.19.70 v4.19.69 v4.19.68 v4.19.67 v4.19.66 v4.19.65 v4.19.64 v4.19.63 v4.19.62 v4.19.61 v4.19.60 v4.19.59 v4.19.58 v4.19.57 v4.19.56 v4.19.55 v4.19.54 v4.19.53 v4.19.52 v4.19.51 v4.19.50 v4.19.49 v4.19.48 v4.19.47 v4.19.46 v4.19.45 v4.19.44 v4.19.43 v4.19.42 v4.19.41 v4.19.40 v4.19.39 v4.19.38 v4.19.37 v4.19.36 v4.19.35 v4.19.34 v4.19.33 v4.19.32 v4.19.31 v4.19.30 v4.19.29 v4.19.28 v4.19.27 v4.19.26 v4.19.25 v4.19.24 v4.19.23 v4.19.22 v4.19.21 v4.19.20 v4.19.19 v4.19.18 v4.19.17 v4.19.16 v4.19.15 v4.19.14 v4.19.13 v4.19.12 v4.19.11 v4.19.10 v4.19.9 v4.19.8 v4.19.7 v4.19.6 v4.19.5 v4.19.4 v4.19.3 v4.19.2 v4.19.1 v4.19 v4.19-rc8 v4.19-rc7 v4.19-rc6 v4.19-rc5 v4.19-rc4 v4.19-rc3 v4.19-rc2 v4.19-rc1 ck-release-21 ck-release-20 ck-release-19.2 ck-release-19.1 ck-release-19 ck-release-18 ck-release-17.2 ck-release-17.1 ck-release-17 ck-release-16 ck-release-15.1 ck-release-15 ck-release-14 ck-release-13.2 ck-release-13 ck-release-12 ck-release-11 ck-release-10 ck-release-9 ck-release-7 alk-release-15 alk-release-14 alk-release-13.2 alk-release-13 alk-release-12 alk-release-11 alk-release-10 alk-release-9 alk-release-7
无相关合并请求
......@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap)
bitmap_super_t *sb;
unsigned long chunksize, daemon_sleep, write_behind;
bitmap->storage.sb_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
bitmap->storage.sb_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
if (bitmap->storage.sb_page == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
bitmap->storage.sb_page->index = 0;
......@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap)
sb->state = cpu_to_le32(bitmap->flags);
bitmap->events_cleared = bitmap->mddev->events;
sb->events_cleared = cpu_to_le64(bitmap->mddev->events);
bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.nodes = 0;
kunmap_atomic(sb);
......@@ -611,8 +612,16 @@ static int bitmap_read_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap)
daemon_sleep = le32_to_cpu(sb->daemon_sleep) * HZ;
write_behind = le32_to_cpu(sb->write_behind);
sectors_reserved = le32_to_cpu(sb->sectors_reserved);
nodes = le32_to_cpu(sb->nodes);
strlcpy(bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name, sb->cluster_name, 64);
/* XXX: This is a hack to ensure that we don't use clustering
* in case:
* - dm-raid is in use and
* - the nodes written in bitmap_sb is erroneous.
*/
if (!bitmap->mddev->sync_super) {
nodes = le32_to_cpu(sb->nodes);
strlcpy(bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name,
sb->cluster_name, 64);
}
/* verify that the bitmap-specific fields are valid */
if (sb->magic != cpu_to_le32(BITMAP_MAGIC))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部