提交 882e9d25 编写于 作者: J Jeff Layton 提交者: J. Bruce Fields

nfsd: clean up and reorganize release_lockowner

Do more within the main loop, and simplify the function a bit. Also,
there's no need to take a stateowner reference unless we're going to call
release_lockowner.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
上级 d4f0489f
master alk-4.19.24 alk-4.19.30 alk-4.19.34 alk-4.19.36 alk-4.19.43 alk-4.19.48 alk-4.19.57 ck-4.19.67 ck-4.19.81 ck-4.19.91 github/fork/deepanshu1422/fix-typo-in-comment github/fork/haosdent/fix-typo linux-next v4.19.91 v4.19.90 v4.19.89 v4.19.88 v4.19.87 v4.19.86 v4.19.85 v4.19.84 v4.19.83 v4.19.82 v4.19.81 v4.19.80 v4.19.79 v4.19.78 v4.19.77 v4.19.76 v4.19.75 v4.19.74 v4.19.73 v4.19.72 v4.19.71 v4.19.70 v4.19.69 v4.19.68 v4.19.67 v4.19.66 v4.19.65 v4.19.64 v4.19.63 v4.19.62 v4.19.61 v4.19.60 v4.19.59 v4.19.58 v4.19.57 v4.19.56 v4.19.55 v4.19.54 v4.19.53 v4.19.52 v4.19.51 v4.19.50 v4.19.49 v4.19.48 v4.19.47 v4.19.46 v4.19.45 v4.19.44 v4.19.43 v4.19.42 v4.19.41 v4.19.40 v4.19.39 v4.19.38 v4.19.37 v4.19.36 v4.19.35 v4.19.34 v4.19.33 v4.19.32 v4.19.31 v4.19.30 v4.19.29 v4.19.28 v4.19.27 v4.19.26 v4.19.25 v4.19.24 v4.19.23 v4.19.22 v4.19.21 v4.19.20 v4.19.19 v4.19.18 v4.19.17 v4.19.16 v4.19.15 v4.19.14 v4.19.13 v4.19.12 v4.19.11 v4.19.10 v4.19.9 v4.19.8 v4.19.7 v4.19.6 v4.19.5 v4.19.4 v4.19.3 v4.19.2 v4.19.1 v4.19 v4.19-rc8 v4.19-rc7 v4.19-rc6 v4.19-rc5 v4.19-rc4 v4.19-rc3 v4.19-rc2 v4.19-rc1 ck-release-21 ck-release-20 ck-release-19.2 ck-release-19.1 ck-release-19 ck-release-18 ck-release-17.2 ck-release-17.1 ck-release-17 ck-release-16 ck-release-15.1 ck-release-15 ck-release-14 ck-release-13.2 ck-release-13 ck-release-12 ck-release-11 ck-release-10 ck-release-9 ck-release-7 alk-release-15 alk-release-14 alk-release-13.2 alk-release-13 alk-release-12 alk-release-11 alk-release-10 alk-release-9 alk-release-7
无相关合并请求
......@@ -5424,8 +5424,8 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
struct nfsd4_release_lockowner *rlockowner)
{
clientid_t *clid = &rlockowner->rl_clientid;
struct nfs4_stateowner *sop = NULL, *tmp;
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
struct nfs4_stateowner *sop;
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = NULL;
struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
struct xdr_netobj *owner = &rlockowner->rl_owner;
unsigned int hashval = ownerstr_hashval(owner);
......@@ -5442,45 +5442,32 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
if (status)
goto out;
status = nfserr_locks_held;
clp = cstate->clp;
/* Find the matching lock stateowner */
spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &clp->cl_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval],
list_for_each_entry(sop, &clp->cl_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval],
so_strhash) {
if (tmp->so_is_open_owner)
continue;
if (same_owner_str(tmp, owner)) {
sop = tmp;
atomic_inc(&sop->so_count);
break;
}
}
/* No matching owner found, maybe a replay? Just declare victory... */
if (!sop) {
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
status = nfs_ok;
goto out;
}
if (sop->so_is_open_owner || !same_owner_str(sop, owner))
continue;
lo = lockowner(sop);
/* see if there are still any locks associated with it */
list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
if (check_for_locks(stp->st_stid.sc_file, lo)) {
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
goto out;
/* see if there are still any locks associated with it */
lo = lockowner(sop);
list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
if (check_for_locks(stp->st_stid.sc_file, lo)) {
status = nfserr_locks_held;
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
goto out;
}
}
atomic_inc(&sop->so_count);
break;
}
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
status = nfs_ok;
sop = NULL;
release_lockowner(lo);
if (lo)
release_lockowner(lo);
out:
if (sop)
nfs4_put_stateowner(sop);
nfs4_unlock_state();
return status;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部