提交 8808b64d 编写于 作者: V Valentine Barshak 提交者: Linus Walleij

gpio: rcar: Fix level interrupt handling

According to the manual, if a port is set for level detection using
the corresponding bit in the edge/level select register and an external
level interrupt signal is asserted, the corresponding bit in INTDT
does not use the FF to hold the input.
Thus, writing 1 to the corresponding bits in INTCLR cannot clear the
corresponding bits in the INTDT register. Instead, when an external
input signal is stopped, the corresponding bit in INTDT is cleared
automatically.

Since the INTDT bit cannot be cleared for the level interrupts until
the interrupt signal is stopped, we end up with the infinite loop
when using deferred (threaded) IRQ handling.

Since a deferred interrupt is disabled by the low-level handler and
re-enabled only when the deferred handler is completed, Fix the issue
by dropping disabled interrupts from the pending mask as suggested by
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

Changes in V2:
* Drop disabled interrupts from pending mask altogether instead of
  dropping level interrupts one by one once they get handled.
Signed-off-by: NValentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>
Acked-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: NMagnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
上级 4cc629b7
master alk-4.19.24 alk-4.19.30 alk-4.19.34 alk-4.19.36 alk-4.19.43 alk-4.19.48 alk-4.19.57 ck-4.19.67 ck-4.19.81 ck-4.19.91 github/fork/deepanshu1422/fix-typo-in-comment github/fork/haosdent/fix-typo linux-next v4.19.91 v4.19.90 v4.19.89 v4.19.88 v4.19.87 v4.19.86 v4.19.85 v4.19.84 v4.19.83 v4.19.82 v4.19.81 v4.19.80 v4.19.79 v4.19.78 v4.19.77 v4.19.76 v4.19.75 v4.19.74 v4.19.73 v4.19.72 v4.19.71 v4.19.70 v4.19.69 v4.19.68 v4.19.67 v4.19.66 v4.19.65 v4.19.64 v4.19.63 v4.19.62 v4.19.61 v4.19.60 v4.19.59 v4.19.58 v4.19.57 v4.19.56 v4.19.55 v4.19.54 v4.19.53 v4.19.52 v4.19.51 v4.19.50 v4.19.49 v4.19.48 v4.19.47 v4.19.46 v4.19.45 v4.19.44 v4.19.43 v4.19.42 v4.19.41 v4.19.40 v4.19.39 v4.19.38 v4.19.37 v4.19.36 v4.19.35 v4.19.34 v4.19.33 v4.19.32 v4.19.31 v4.19.30 v4.19.29 v4.19.28 v4.19.27 v4.19.26 v4.19.25 v4.19.24 v4.19.23 v4.19.22 v4.19.21 v4.19.20 v4.19.19 v4.19.18 v4.19.17 v4.19.16 v4.19.15 v4.19.14 v4.19.13 v4.19.12 v4.19.11 v4.19.10 v4.19.9 v4.19.8 v4.19.7 v4.19.6 v4.19.5 v4.19.4 v4.19.3 v4.19.2 v4.19.1 v4.19 v4.19-rc8 v4.19-rc7 v4.19-rc6 v4.19-rc5 v4.19-rc4 v4.19-rc3 v4.19-rc2 v4.19-rc1 ck-release-21 ck-release-20 ck-release-19.2 ck-release-19.1 ck-release-19 ck-release-18 ck-release-17.2 ck-release-17.1 ck-release-17 ck-release-16 ck-release-15.1 ck-release-15 ck-release-14 ck-release-13.2 ck-release-13 ck-release-12 ck-release-11 ck-release-10 ck-release-9 ck-release-7 alk-release-15 alk-release-14 alk-release-13.2 alk-release-13 alk-release-12 alk-release-11 alk-release-10 alk-release-9 alk-release-7
无相关合并请求
......@@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static irqreturn_t gpio_rcar_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
u32 pending;
unsigned int offset, irqs_handled = 0;
while ((pending = gpio_rcar_read(p, INTDT))) {
while ((pending = gpio_rcar_read(p, INTDT) &
gpio_rcar_read(p, INTMSK))) {
offset = __ffs(pending);
gpio_rcar_write(p, INTCLR, BIT(offset));
generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(p->irq_domain, offset));
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部