提交 78faae37 编写于 作者: R Roland Dreier 提交者: Nicholas Bellinger

target: Make transport_lookup_cmd_lun() locking IRQ-safe

transport_lookup_cmd_lun() may be called from interrupt context (eg
tcm_loop_allocate_core_cmd() calls it, and it has a comment that says,
"Can be called from interrupt context"), so it needs to use
spin_lock_irqsave() instead of spin_lock_irq() to avoid enabling
interrupts at the wrong time.

(And indeed the last set of lock operations, on lun_cmd_lock, were
already using spin_lock_irqsave(), so we just need to fix the other
two locks we take)
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: NNicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
上级 07bde79a
master alk-4.19.24 alk-4.19.30 alk-4.19.34 alk-4.19.36 alk-4.19.43 alk-4.19.48 alk-4.19.57 ck-4.19.67 ck-4.19.81 ck-4.19.91 github/fork/deepanshu1422/fix-typo-in-comment github/fork/haosdent/fix-typo linux-next v4.19.91 v4.19.90 v4.19.89 v4.19.88 v4.19.87 v4.19.86 v4.19.85 v4.19.84 v4.19.83 v4.19.82 v4.19.81 v4.19.80 v4.19.79 v4.19.78 v4.19.77 v4.19.76 v4.19.75 v4.19.74 v4.19.73 v4.19.72 v4.19.71 v4.19.70 v4.19.69 v4.19.68 v4.19.67 v4.19.66 v4.19.65 v4.19.64 v4.19.63 v4.19.62 v4.19.61 v4.19.60 v4.19.59 v4.19.58 v4.19.57 v4.19.56 v4.19.55 v4.19.54 v4.19.53 v4.19.52 v4.19.51 v4.19.50 v4.19.49 v4.19.48 v4.19.47 v4.19.46 v4.19.45 v4.19.44 v4.19.43 v4.19.42 v4.19.41 v4.19.40 v4.19.39 v4.19.38 v4.19.37 v4.19.36 v4.19.35 v4.19.34 v4.19.33 v4.19.32 v4.19.31 v4.19.30 v4.19.29 v4.19.28 v4.19.27 v4.19.26 v4.19.25 v4.19.24 v4.19.23 v4.19.22 v4.19.21 v4.19.20 v4.19.19 v4.19.18 v4.19.17 v4.19.16 v4.19.15 v4.19.14 v4.19.13 v4.19.12 v4.19.11 v4.19.10 v4.19.9 v4.19.8 v4.19.7 v4.19.6 v4.19.5 v4.19.4 v4.19.3 v4.19.2 v4.19.1 v4.19 v4.19-rc8 v4.19-rc7 v4.19-rc6 v4.19-rc5 v4.19-rc4 v4.19-rc3 v4.19-rc2 v4.19-rc1 ck-release-21 ck-release-20 ck-release-19.2 ck-release-19.1 ck-release-19 ck-release-18 ck-release-17.2 ck-release-17.1 ck-release-17 ck-release-16 ck-release-15.1 ck-release-15 ck-release-14 ck-release-13.2 ck-release-13 ck-release-12 ck-release-11 ck-release-10 ck-release-9 ck-release-7 alk-release-15 alk-release-14 alk-release-13.2 alk-release-13 alk-release-12 alk-release-11 alk-release-10 alk-release-9 alk-release-7
无相关合并请求
......@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ int transport_lookup_cmd_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u32 unpacked_lun)
return -ENODEV;
}
spin_lock_irq(&se_sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock);
spin_lock_irqsave(&se_sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock, flags);
se_cmd->se_deve = &se_sess->se_node_acl->device_list[unpacked_lun];
if (se_cmd->se_deve->lun_flags & TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_INITIATOR_ACCESS) {
struct se_dev_entry *deve = se_cmd->se_deve;
......@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ int transport_lookup_cmd_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u32 unpacked_lun)
" Access for 0x%08x\n",
se_cmd->se_tfo->get_fabric_name(),
unpacked_lun);
spin_unlock_irq(&se_sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&se_sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock, flags);
return -EACCES;
}
......@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int transport_lookup_cmd_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u32 unpacked_lun)
se_cmd->se_orig_obj_ptr = se_cmd->se_lun->lun_se_dev;
se_cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SE_LUN_CMD;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&se_sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&se_sess->se_node_acl->device_list_lock, flags);
if (!se_lun) {
/*
......@@ -154,13 +154,13 @@ int transport_lookup_cmd_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u32 unpacked_lun)
/* TODO: get rid of this and use atomics for stats */
dev = se_lun->lun_se_dev;
spin_lock_irq(&dev->stats_lock);
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->stats_lock, flags);
dev->num_cmds++;
if (se_cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE)
dev->write_bytes += se_cmd->data_length;
else if (se_cmd->data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
dev->read_bytes += se_cmd->data_length;
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->stats_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->stats_lock, flags);
/*
* Add the iscsi_cmd_t to the struct se_lun's cmd list. This list is used
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部