提交 4743f839 编写于 作者: P Pranay Kr. Srivastava 提交者: Theodore Ts'o

ext4: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE in ext4_commit_super()

If there are racing calls to ext4_commit_super() it's possible for
another writeback of the superblock to result in the buffer being
marked with an error after we check if the buffer is marked as having
a write error and the buffer up-to-date flag is set again.  If that
happens mark_buffer_dirty() can end up throwing a WARN_ON_ONCE.

Fix this by moving this check to write before we call
write_buffer_dirty(), and keeping the buffer locked during this whole
sequence.
Signed-off-by: NPranay Kr. Srivastava <pranjas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
上级 646caa9c
master alk-4.19.24 alk-4.19.30 alk-4.19.34 alk-4.19.36 alk-4.19.43 alk-4.19.48 alk-4.19.57 ck-4.19.67 ck-4.19.81 ck-4.19.91 github/fork/deepanshu1422/fix-typo-in-comment github/fork/haosdent/fix-typo linux-next v4.19.91 v4.19.90 v4.19.89 v4.19.88 v4.19.87 v4.19.86 v4.19.85 v4.19.84 v4.19.83 v4.19.82 v4.19.81 v4.19.80 v4.19.79 v4.19.78 v4.19.77 v4.19.76 v4.19.75 v4.19.74 v4.19.73 v4.19.72 v4.19.71 v4.19.70 v4.19.69 v4.19.68 v4.19.67 v4.19.66 v4.19.65 v4.19.64 v4.19.63 v4.19.62 v4.19.61 v4.19.60 v4.19.59 v4.19.58 v4.19.57 v4.19.56 v4.19.55 v4.19.54 v4.19.53 v4.19.52 v4.19.51 v4.19.50 v4.19.49 v4.19.48 v4.19.47 v4.19.46 v4.19.45 v4.19.44 v4.19.43 v4.19.42 v4.19.41 v4.19.40 v4.19.39 v4.19.38 v4.19.37 v4.19.36 v4.19.35 v4.19.34 v4.19.33 v4.19.32 v4.19.31 v4.19.30 v4.19.29 v4.19.28 v4.19.27 v4.19.26 v4.19.25 v4.19.24 v4.19.23 v4.19.22 v4.19.21 v4.19.20 v4.19.19 v4.19.18 v4.19.17 v4.19.16 v4.19.15 v4.19.14 v4.19.13 v4.19.12 v4.19.11 v4.19.10 v4.19.9 v4.19.8 v4.19.7 v4.19.6 v4.19.5 v4.19.4 v4.19.3 v4.19.2 v4.19.1 v4.19 v4.19-rc8 v4.19-rc7 v4.19-rc6 v4.19-rc5 v4.19-rc4 v4.19-rc3 v4.19-rc2 v4.19-rc1 ck-release-21 ck-release-20 ck-release-19.2 ck-release-19.1 ck-release-19 ck-release-18 ck-release-17.2 ck-release-17.1 ck-release-17 ck-release-16 ck-release-15.1 ck-release-15 ck-release-14 ck-release-13.2 ck-release-13 ck-release-12 ck-release-11 ck-release-10 ck-release-9 ck-release-7 alk-release-15 alk-release-14 alk-release-13.2 alk-release-13 alk-release-12 alk-release-11 alk-release-10 alk-release-9 alk-release-7
无相关合并请求
......@@ -4327,20 +4327,6 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
if (!sbh || block_device_ejected(sb))
return error;
if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
/*
* Oh, dear. A previous attempt to write the
* superblock failed. This could happen because the
* USB device was yanked out. Or it could happen to
* be a transient write error and maybe the block will
* be remapped. Nothing we can do but to retry the
* write and hope for the best.
*/
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "previous I/O error to "
"superblock detected");
clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
}
/*
* If the file system is mounted read-only, don't update the
* superblock write time. This avoids updating the superblock
......@@ -4371,7 +4357,23 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb, int sync)
&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeinodes_counter));
BUFFER_TRACE(sbh, "marking dirty");
ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb);
lock_buffer(sbh);
if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
/*
* Oh, dear. A previous attempt to write the
* superblock failed. This could happen because the
* USB device was yanked out. Or it could happen to
* be a transient write error and maybe the block will
* be remapped. Nothing we can do but to retry the
* write and hope for the best.
*/
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "previous I/O error to "
"superblock detected");
clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
}
mark_buffer_dirty(sbh);
unlock_buffer(sbh);
if (sync) {
error = __sync_dirty_buffer(sbh,
test_opt(sb, BARRIER) ? WRITE_FUA : WRITE_SYNC);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部