提交 0701c53e 编写于 作者: M Marc Zyngier 提交者: Thomas Gleixner

genirq/msi: Do not use pci_msi_[un]mask_irq as default methods

When we create a generic MSI domain, that MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS
is set, and that any of .mask or .unmask are NULL in the irq_chip
structure, we set them to pci_msi_[un]mask_irq.

This is a bad idea for at least two reasons:
- PCI_MSI might not be selected, kernel fails to build (yes, this is
  legitimate, at least on arm64!)
- This may not be a PCI/MSI domain at all (platform MSI, for example)

Either way, this looks wrong. Move the overriding of mask/unmask to
the PCI counterpart, and panic is any of these two methods is not
set in the core code (they really should be present).
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444760085-27857-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
上级 25cb62b7
master alk-4.19.24 alk-4.19.30 alk-4.19.34 alk-4.19.36 alk-4.19.43 alk-4.19.48 alk-4.19.57 ck-4.19.67 ck-4.19.81 ck-4.19.91 github/fork/deepanshu1422/fix-typo-in-comment github/fork/haosdent/fix-typo linux-next v4.19.91 v4.19.90 v4.19.89 v4.19.88 v4.19.87 v4.19.86 v4.19.85 v4.19.84 v4.19.83 v4.19.82 v4.19.81 v4.19.80 v4.19.79 v4.19.78 v4.19.77 v4.19.76 v4.19.75 v4.19.74 v4.19.73 v4.19.72 v4.19.71 v4.19.70 v4.19.69 v4.19.68 v4.19.67 v4.19.66 v4.19.65 v4.19.64 v4.19.63 v4.19.62 v4.19.61 v4.19.60 v4.19.59 v4.19.58 v4.19.57 v4.19.56 v4.19.55 v4.19.54 v4.19.53 v4.19.52 v4.19.51 v4.19.50 v4.19.49 v4.19.48 v4.19.47 v4.19.46 v4.19.45 v4.19.44 v4.19.43 v4.19.42 v4.19.41 v4.19.40 v4.19.39 v4.19.38 v4.19.37 v4.19.36 v4.19.35 v4.19.34 v4.19.33 v4.19.32 v4.19.31 v4.19.30 v4.19.29 v4.19.28 v4.19.27 v4.19.26 v4.19.25 v4.19.24 v4.19.23 v4.19.22 v4.19.21 v4.19.20 v4.19.19 v4.19.18 v4.19.17 v4.19.16 v4.19.15 v4.19.14 v4.19.13 v4.19.12 v4.19.11 v4.19.10 v4.19.9 v4.19.8 v4.19.7 v4.19.6 v4.19.5 v4.19.4 v4.19.3 v4.19.2 v4.19.1 v4.19 v4.19-rc8 v4.19-rc7 v4.19-rc6 v4.19-rc5 v4.19-rc4 v4.19-rc3 v4.19-rc2 v4.19-rc1 ck-release-21 ck-release-20 ck-release-19.2 ck-release-19.1 ck-release-19 ck-release-18 ck-release-17.2 ck-release-17.1 ck-release-17 ck-release-16 ck-release-15.1 ck-release-15 ck-release-14 ck-release-13.2 ck-release-13 ck-release-12 ck-release-11 ck-release-10 ck-release-9 ck-release-7 alk-release-15 alk-release-14 alk-release-13.2 alk-release-13 alk-release-12 alk-release-11 alk-release-10 alk-release-9 alk-release-7
无相关合并请求
......@@ -1243,6 +1243,10 @@ static void pci_msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
BUG_ON(!chip);
if (!chip->irq_write_msi_msg)
chip->irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg;
if (!chip->irq_mask)
chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
if (!chip->irq_unmask)
chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
}
/**
......
......@@ -228,11 +228,7 @@ static void msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
{
struct irq_chip *chip = info->chip;
BUG_ON(!chip);
if (!chip->irq_mask)
chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
if (!chip->irq_unmask)
chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
BUG_ON(!chip || !chip->irq_mask || !chip->irq_unmask);
if (!chip->irq_set_affinity)
chip->irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部