Follow up of #35280.

If a model has default scopes, vanilla `klass.all` is not the same with
`klass.unscoped`.

In that case, we should use `klass.default_scoped` instead.

`except` was removed at b77dd218

We sometimes say "✂️ newline after `private`" in a code review (e.g.
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/18546#discussion_r23188776,
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/34832#discussion_r244847195).

Now `Layout/EmptyLinesAroundAccessModifier` cop have new enforced style
`EnforcedStyle: only_before` (https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/pull/7059).

That cop and enforced style will reduce the our code review cost.

Follow up of #35868.

Closes #19349.

This deprecates using class level querying methods if the receiver scope
regarded as leaked, since #32380 and #35186 may cause that silently
leaking information when people upgrade the app.

We need deprecation first before making those.

Don't use `false` as special value to skip to find inherited scope, we
could use `skip_inherited_scope = true`, and move `_scoping` back on
Relation.

Active Record uses `scoping` to delegate to named scopes from relations
for propagating the chaining source scope. It was needed to restore the
source scope in named scopes, but it was caused undesired behavior that
pollute all class level querying methods.

Example:

```ruby
class Topic < ActiveRecord::Base
  scope :toplevel, -> { where(parent_id: nil) }
  scope :children, -> { where.not(parent_id: nil) }
  scope :has_children, -> { where(id: Topic.children.select(:parent_id)) }
end

# Works as expected.
Topic.toplevel.where(id: Topic.children.select(:parent_id))

# Doesn't work due to leaking `toplevel` to `Topic.children`.
Topic.toplevel.has_children
```

Since #29301, the receiver in named scopes has changed from the model
class to the chaining source scope, so the polluting class level
querying methods is no longer required for that purpose.

Fixes #14003.

https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14133

The delegation methods to named scope are defined when `method_missing`
is invoked on the relation.

Since #29301, the receiver in the named scope is changed to the relation
like others (e.g. `default_scope`, etc) for consistency.

Most named scopes would be delegated from relation by `method_missing`,
since we don't allow scopes to be defined which conflict with instance
methods on `Relation` (#31179). But if a named scope is defined with the
same name as any method on the `superclass` (e.g. `Kernel.open`), the
`method_missing` on the relation is not invoked.

To address the issue, make the delegation methods to named scope is
generated in the definition time.

Fixes #34098.

`scoping` stashes the reciever and then returning that as `klass.all`.
`all.scoping` has no effect to the public behavior, so it is redundant.

The receiver in a scope was changed from `klass` to `relation` itself
for all scopes (named scope, default_scope, and association scope)
behaves consistently.

In addition. Before 5.2, if both an AR model class and a Relation
instance have same named methods (e.g. `arel_attribute`,
`predicate_builder`, etc), named scope doesn't respect relation instance
information.

For example:

```ruby
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :comments1, class_name: "RecentComment1"
  has_many :comments2, class_name: "RecentComment2"
end

class RecentComment1 < ActiveRecord::Base
  self.table_name = "comments"
  default_scope { where(arel_attribute(:created_at).gteq(2.weeks.ago)) }
end

class RecentComment2 < ActiveRecord::Base
  self.table_name = "comments"
  default_scope { recent_updated }
  scope :recent_updated, -> { where(arel_attribute(:updated_at).gteq(2.weeks.ago)) }
end
```

If eager loading `Post.eager_load(:comments1, :comments2).to_a`,
`:comments1` (default_scope) respects aliased table name, but
`:comments2` (using named scope) may not work correctly since named
scope doesn't respect relation instance information. See also 801ccab2.

But this is a breaking change between releases without deprecation.
I decided to bring back private class methods accessibility in named
scope.

Fixes #31740.
Fixes #32331.

Due to inconsistent behavior when chaining scopes and one scope named after a Relation method

Validation code added in 2 places:

- scope, to prevent problematic scope names.
- enum, cause it tries to auto define scope.

A relation includes `klass`, so it can not be used as it is if current
class is different from `current_scope.klass`. It should be created new
relation by current class to respect the klass and STI constraint.

Fixes #17603.
Fixes #23576.

Follow up of #29834.

Fixes #30266.

This reverts commit 3420a145, reversing
changes made to afb66a5a.

Currently the receiver in a scope is `klass`, not `relation`.
I think it is a strange because the receiver in `default_scope` and a
scope on association is `relation`.
I fixed to the receiver is to be a `relation` properly for consistency.

As @matthewd's suggestion, if `klass` has no default scope, it will more
faster.

Some methods were added to public API in
5b14129d and they should be not part of
the public API.

Mainly around `nil`

[ci skip]

The current code base is not uniform. After some discussion,
we have chosen to go with double quotes by default.

This reverts commit f6db31ec.

Reason:
Scope names can very easily conflict, particularly when sharing Concerns
within the team, or using multiple gems that extend AR models.

It is true that Ruby has the ability to detect this with the -w option, but the
reality is that we are depending on too many gems that do not care about Ruby
warnings, therefore it might not be a realistic solution to turn this switch on
in our real-world apps.

The focus of this change is to make the API more accessible.
References to method and classes should be linked to make it easy to
navigate around.

This patch makes exzessiv use of `rdoc-ref:` to provide more readable
docs. This makes it possible to document `ActiveRecord::Base#save` even
though the method is within a separate module
`ActiveRecord::Persistence`. The goal here is to bring the API closer to
the actual code that you would write.

This commit only deals with Active Record. The other gems will be
updated accordingly but in different commits. The pass through Active
Record is not completely finished yet. A follow up commit will change
the spots I haven't yet had the time to update.

/cc @fxn

Adds a paragraph to the documentation of the `ActiveRecord::Scoping::Named.scope` method,
explaining that the method is intended to return an ActiveRecord::Relation object to be
composable with other scopes.

In the case that in the case that `nil` or `false` are returned, the method returns
an `all` relation instead.
This unexpected behaviour is mentioned in #19249 #14256 #21465 and #21882 and wasn't
documented at all. This commit adds this documentation.

Instead use .scope_attributes? consistently in ActiveRecord to check whether
there are attributes currently associated with the scope.

Move the implementation of .scope_attributes? and .scope_attributes to
ActiveRecord::Scoping because they don't particularly have to do specifically
with Named scopes and their only dependency, in the case of
.scope_attributes?, and only caller, in the case of .scope_attributes is
contained in Scoping.

It looks like the only reason `current_scope` was thread local on
`base_class` instead of `self` is to ensure that when we call a named
scope created with a proc on the parent class, it correctly uses the
default scope of the subclass. The reason this wasn't happening was
because the proc captured `self` as the parent class, and we're not
actually defining a real method. Using `instance_exec` fixes the
problem.

Fixes #18806

Relation#merge checks if the argument is an array and the only possible
returns of build_default_scope is nil or a Relation.

Doing this we can raise an ArgumentError when Relation#merge receive a
nil value.

This changes the actual exception `NoMethodError: undefined method `call'
for #<ActiveRecord::Relation []>` to a `ArgumentError` when try to define
a scope without a callable.

This reverts commit 9a1abedc, reversing
changes made to c72d6c91.

Conflicts:
	activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
	activerecord/test/models/comment.rb

This change break integration with activerecord-deprecated_finders so
I'm reverting until we find a way to make it work with this gem.

Changed the call to a scope block to be evaluated with instance_eval.
The result is that ScopeRegistry can use the actual class instead of base_class when
caching scopes so queries made by classes with a common ancestor won't leak scopes.

Similar to dangerous attribute methods, a scope name conflict is
dangerous if it conflicts with an existing class method defined within
`ActiveRecord::Base` but not its ancestors.

See also #13389.

*Godfrey Chan*, *Philippe Creux*

The deprecation message was removed on 50cbc03d but the code was not.