1. 20 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      arm: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all ARM users · 8bd26e3a
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      and are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
      rid of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code,
      and all __CPUINIT from assembly code.  It also had two ".previous"
      section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT
      (aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      8bd26e3a
  3. 29 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 25 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      ARM: mm: implement LoUIS API for cache maintenance ops · 031bd879
      Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
      ARM v7 architecture introduced the concept of cache levels and related
      control registers. New processors like A7 and A15 embed an L2 unified cache
      controller that becomes part of the cache level hierarchy. Some operations in
      the kernel like cpu_suspend and __cpu_disable do not require a flush of the
      entire cache hierarchy to DRAM but just the cache levels belonging to the
      Level of Unification Inner Shareable (LoUIS), which in most of ARM v7 systems
      correspond to L1.
      
      The current cache flushing API used in cpu_suspend and __cpu_disable,
      flush_cache_all(), ends up flushing the whole cache hierarchy since for
      v7 it cleans and invalidates all cache levels up to Level of Coherency
      (LoC) which cripples system performance when used in hot paths like hotplug
      and cpuidle.
      
      Therefore a new kernel cache maintenance API must be added to cope with
      latest ARM system requirements.
      
      This patch adds flush_cache_louis() to the ARM kernel cache maintenance API.
      
      This function cleans and invalidates all data cache levels up to the
      Level of Unification Inner Shareable (LoUIS) and invalidates the instruction
      cache for processors that support it (> v7).
      
      This patch also creates an alias of the cache LoUIS function to flush_kern_all
      for all processor versions prior to v7, so that the current cache flushing
      behaviour is unchanged for those processors.
      
      v7 cache maintenance code implements a cache LoUIS function that cleans and
      invalidates the D-cache up to LoUIS and invalidates the I-cache, according
      to the new API.
      Reviewed-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Reviewed-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
      Tested-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
      031bd879
  5. 02 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 07 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 23 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      ARM: 6466/1: implement flush_icache_all for the rest of the CPUs · c8c90860
      Mika Westerberg 提交于
      Commit 81d11955 ("ARM: 6405/1: Handle __flush_icache_all for
      CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP") added a new function to struct cpu_cache_fns:
      flush_icache_all(). It also implemented this for v6 and v7 but not
      for v5 and backwards. Without the function pointer in place, we
      will be calling wrong cache functions.
      
      For example with ep93xx we get following:
      
          Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ee070f38
          pgd = c0004000
          [ee070f38] *pgd=00000000
          Internal error: Oops: 80000005 [#1] PREEMPT
          last sysfs file:
          Modules linked in:
          CPU: 0    Not tainted  (2.6.36+ #1)
          PC is at 0xee070f38
          LR is at __dma_alloc+0x11c/0x2d0
          pc : [<ee070f38>]    lr : [<c0032c8c>]    psr: 60000013
          sp : c581bde0  ip : 00000000  fp : c0472000
          r10: c0472000  r9 : 000000d0  r8 : 00020000
          r7 : 0001ffff  r6 : 00000000  r5 : c0472400  r4 : c5980000
          r3 : c03ab7e0  r2 : 00000000  r1 : c59a0000  r0 : c5980000
          Flags: nZCv  IRQs on  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment kernel
          Control: c000717f  Table: c0004000  DAC: 00000017
          Process swapper (pid: 1, stack limit = 0xc581a270)
          [<c0032c8c>] (__dma_alloc+0x11c/0x2d0)
          [<c0032e5c>] (dma_alloc_writecombine+0x1c/0x24)
          [<c0204148>] (ep93xx_pcm_preallocate_dma_buffer+0x44/0x60)
          [<c02041c0>] (ep93xx_pcm_new+0x5c/0x88)
          [<c01ff188>] (snd_soc_instantiate_cards+0x8a8/0xbc0)
          [<c01ff59c>] (soc_probe+0xfc/0x134)
          [<c01adafc>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c)
          [<c01acca4>] (driver_probe_device+0xb0/0x16c)
          [<c01ac284>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x48/0x84)
          [<c01ace90>] (device_attach+0x50/0x68)
          [<c01ac0f8>] (bus_probe_device+0x24/0x44)
          [<c01aad7c>] (device_add+0x2fc/0x44c)
          [<c01adfa8>] (platform_device_add+0x104/0x15c)
          [<c0015eb8>] (simone_init+0x60/0x94)
          [<c0021410>] (do_one_initcall+0xd0/0x1a4)
      
      __dma_alloc() calls (inlined) __dma_alloc_buffer() which ends up
      calling dmac_flush_range(). Now since the entries in the
      arm920_cache_fns are shifted by one, we jump into address 0xee070f38
      which is actually next instruction after the arm920_cache_fns
      structure.
      
      So implement flush_icache_all() for the rest of the supported CPUs
      using a generic 'invalidate I cache' instruction.
      Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      c8c90860
  10. 08 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 27 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • R
      ARM: Factor out common code from cpu_proc_fin() · 9ca03a21
      Russell King 提交于
      All implementations of cpu_proc_fin() start by disabling interrupts
      and then flush caches.  Rather than have every processors proc_fin()
      implementation do this, move it out into generic code - and move the
      cache flush past setup_mm_for_reboot() (so it can benefit from having
      caches still enabled.)
      
      This allows cpu_proc_fin() to become independent of the L1/L2 cache
      types, and eventually move the L2 cache flushing into the L2 support
      code.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      9ca03a21
  12. 15 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  13. 14 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 03 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 01 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  16. 26 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 08 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 23 6月, 2008 8 次提交
  19. 29 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  20. 24 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  22. 26 1月, 2008 2 次提交
  23. 31 10月, 2007 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] Fix FIQ issue with ARM926 · 0214f922
      Russell King 提交于
      Jon Eibertzon writes:
      > We have noticed that the I-cache is disabled while waiting for
      > interrupt in cpu_arm926_do_idle in arch/arm/mm/proc-arm926.S
      > and we are curious to know why, because this causes us a great
      > performance hit when executing in FIQ-handlers. Is it assumed
      > here that every individual FIQ-handler re-enables the I-cache?
      
      The I-cache disable is an errata workaround, so the solution is to
      disable FIQs across the section with the I-cache disabled.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      0214f922
  24. 13 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] Unuse another Linux PTE bit · ad1ae2fe
      Russell King 提交于
      L_PTE_ASID is not really required to be stored in every PTE, since we
      can identify it via the address passed to set_pte_at().  So, create
      set_pte_ext() which takes the address of the PTE to set, the Linux
      PTE value, and the additional CPU PTE bits which aren't encoded in
      the Linux PTE value.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      ad1ae2fe
  25. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] Handle HWCAP_VFP in VFP support code · efe90d27
      Russell King 提交于
      Don't set HWCAP_VFP in the processor support file; not only does it
      depend on the processor features, but it also depends on the support
      code being present.  Therefore, only set it if the support code
      detects that we have a VFP coprocessor attached.
      
      Also, move the VFP handling of the coprocessor access register into
      the VFP support code.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      efe90d27
  26. 30 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  27. 07 9月, 2006 1 次提交