1. 20 8月, 2013 3 次提交
  2. 14 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 31 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 27 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ARM: Allow selection HZ values · c9218b16
      Russell King 提交于
      Allow users to configure the Hz rate on implementations which do not have
      a fixed clock rate.
      
      Whenever HZ_FIXED is not set through one of its "default" settings, the
      user is allowed to select a tick rate from 100, 200, 250, 300, 500Hz
      and 1kHz.  This is slightly more choice than with the generic HZ
      selection in kernel/Kconfig.hz (which only does 100, 250, 300Hz and
      1kHz).  The reason for including 200Hz is that a greater number of other
      platforms want that via the fixed rate, and 500Hz just seemed to be a
      better middle value than 300Hz (which is of course very close to 250.)
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      c9218b16
  5. 26 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ARM: constify machine_desc structure uses · ff69a4c8
      Russell King 提交于
      struct machine_desc records are defined everywhere as a 'const'
      structure, but unfortuantely it loses its const-ness through the use of
      linker magic - the symbols which surround the section are not declared
      const so it becomes possible not to use 'const' for pointers to these
      const structures.
      
      Let's fix this oversight - all pointers to these structures should be
      marked const too.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      ff69a4c8
  6. 19 7月, 2013 18 次提交
  7. 18 7月, 2013 6 次提交
  8. 17 7月, 2013 3 次提交
  9. 16 7月, 2013 3 次提交
  10. 15 7月, 2013 3 次提交
    • P
      x86: delete __cpuinit usage from all x86 files · 148f9bb8
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
      of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
      all C files.  x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files,
      and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can
      delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: x86@kernel.org
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      148f9bb8
    • P
      score: delete __cpuinit usage from all score files · 70e2a7bf
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
      of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the arch/score uses of the __cpuinit macros from
      all C files.  Currently score does not have any __CPUINIT used in
      assembly files.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
      Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      70e2a7bf
    • P
      xtensa: delete __cpuinit usage from all xtensa files · 6cb4c159
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
      of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the arch/xtensa uses of the __cpuinit macros from
      all C files.  Currently xtensa does not have any __CPUINIT used in
      assembly files.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
      Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
      Cc: linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      6cb4c159