1. 10 8月, 2015 5 次提交
    • L
      conf: new pcie-controller model "pcie-switch-downstream-port" · 76379a6e
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This controller can be connected only to a port on a
      pcie-switch-upstream-port. It provides a single hotpluggable port that
      will accept any PCI or PCIe device, as well as any device requiring a
      pcie-*-port (the only current example of such a device is the
      pcie-switch-upstream-port).
      76379a6e
    • L
      conf: new pci controller model "pcie-switch-upstream-port" · 38ea9515
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This controller can be connected only to a pcie-root-port or a
      pcie-switch-downstream-port (which will be added in a later patch),
      which is the reason for the new connect type
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_PORT. A pcie-switch-upstream-port provides
      32 ports (slot=0 to slot=31) on the downstream side, which can only
      have pci controllers of model "pcie-switch-downstream-port" plugged
      into them, which is the reason for the other new connect type
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_SWITCH.
      38ea9515
    • L
      conf: new pci controller model "pcie-root-port" · dce3b8be
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This controller can be connected (at domain startup time only - not
      hotpluggable) only to a port on the pcie root complex ("pcie-root" in
      libvirt config), hence the new connect type
      VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCIE_ROOT. It provides a hotpluggable port that
      will accept any PCI or PCIe device.
      
      New attributes must be added to the controller <target> subelement for
      this - chassis and port are guest-visible option values that will be
      set by libvirt with values derived from the controller's index and pci
      address information.
      dce3b8be
    • L
      conf: add new <target> subelement with chassisNr attribute to <controller> · 8dc88aee
      Laine Stump 提交于
      There are some configuration options to some types of pci controllers
      that are currently automatically derived from other parts of the
      controller's configuration. For example, in qemu a pci-bridge
      controller has an option that is called "chassis_nr"; up until now
      libvirt has always set chassis_nr to the index of the pci-bridge. So
      this:
      
        <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'/>
      
      will always result in:
      
        -device pci-bridge,chassis_nr=2,...
      
      on the qemu commandline. In the future we may decide there is a better
      way to derive that option, but even in that case we will need for
      existing domains to retain the same chassis_nr they were using in the
      past - that is something that is visible to the guest so it is part of
      the guest ABI and changing it would lead to problems for migrating
      guests (or just guests with very picky OSes).
      
      The <target> subelement has been added as a place to put the new
      "chassisNr" attribute that will be filled in by libvirt when it
      auto-generates the chassisNr; it will be saved in the config, then
      reused any time the domain is started:
      
        <controller type='pci' model='pci-bridge' index='2'>
          <model type='pci-bridge'/>
          <target chassisNr='2'/>
        </controller>
      
      The one oddity of all this is that if the controller configuration
      is changed (for example to change the index or the pci address
      where the controller is plugged in), the items in <target> will
      *not* be re-generated, which might lead to conflict. I can't
      really see any way around this, but fortunately if there is a
      material conflict qemu will let us know and we will pass that on
      to the user.
      8dc88aee
    • L
      conf: add new <model> subelement with name attribute to <controller> · bf202510
      Laine Stump 提交于
      This new subelement is used in PCI controllers: the toplevel
      *attribute* "model" of a controller denotes what kind of PCI
      controller is being described, e.g. a "dmi-to-pci-bridge",
      "pci-bridge", or "pci-root". But in the future there will be different
      implementations of some of those types of PCI controllers, which
      behave similarly from libvirt's point of view (and so should have the
      same model), but use a different device in qemu (and present
      themselves as a different piece of hardware in the guest). In an ideal
      world we (i.e. "I") would have thought of that back when the pci
      controllers were added, and used some sort of type/class/model
      notation (where class was used in the way we are now using model, and
      model was used for the actual manufacturer's model number of a
      particular family of PCI controller), but that opportunity is long
      past, so as an alternative, this patch allows selecting a particular
      implementation of a pci controller with the "name" attribute of the
      <model> subelement, e.g.:
      
        <controller type='pci' model='dmi-to-pci-bridge' index='1'>
          <model name='i82801b11-bridge'/>
        </controller>
      
      In this case, "dmi-to-pci-bridge" is the kind of controller (one that
      has a single PCIe port upstream, and 32 standard PCI ports downstream,
      which are not hotpluggable), and the qemu device to be used to
      implement this kind of controller is named "i82801b11-bridge".
      
      Implementing the above now will allow us in the future to add a new
      kind of dmi-to-pci-bridge that doesn't use qemu's i82801b11-bridge
      device, but instead uses something else (which doesn't yet exist, but
      qemu people have been discussing it), all without breaking existing
      configs.
      
      (note that for the existing "pci-bridge" type of PCI controller, both
      the model attribute and <model> name are 'pci-bridge'. This is just a
      coincidence, since it turns out that in this case the device name in
      qemu really is a generic 'pci-bridge' rather than being the name of
      some real-world chip)
      bf202510
  2. 09 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      conf: more useful error message when pci function is out of range · f8fe8f03
      Laine Stump 提交于
      If a pci address had a function number out of range, the error message
      would be:
      
        Insufficient specification for PCI address
      
      which is logged by virDevicePCIAddressParseXML() after
      virDevicePCIAddressIsValid returns a failure.
      
      This patch enhances virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() to optionally report
      the error itself (since it is the place that decides which part of the
      address is "invalid"), and uses that feature when calling from
      virDevicePCIAddressParseXML(), so that the error will be more useful,
      e.g.:
      
        Invalid PCI address function=0x8, must be <= 7
      
      Previously, virDevicePCIAddressIsValid didn't check for the
      theoretical limits of domain or bus, only for slot or function. While
      adding log messages, we also correct that ommission. (The RNG for PCI
      addresses already enforces this limit, which by the way means that we
      can't add any negative tests for this - as far as I know our
      domainschematest has no provisions for passing XML that is supposed to
      fail).
      
      Note that virDevicePCIAddressIsValid() can only check against the
      absolute maximum attribute values for *any* possible PCI controller,
      not for the actual maximums of the specific controller that this
      device is attaching to; fortunately there is later more specific
      validation for guest-side PCI addresses when building the set of
      assigned PCI addresses. For host-side PCI addresses (e.g. for
      <hostdev> and for network device pools), we rely on the error that
      will be logged when it is found that the device doesn't actually
      exist.
      
      This resolves:
      
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004596
      f8fe8f03
  3. 07 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 05 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      conf: Resolve Coverity FORWARD_NULL · a16871fe
      John Ferlan 提交于
      The recent changes to perform SCSI device address checks during the
      post parse callbacks ran afoul of the Coverity checker since the changes
      assumed that the 'xmlopt' parameter to virDomainDeviceDefPostParse
      would be non NULL (commit id 'ca2cf74e'); however, what was missed
      is there was an "if (xmlopt &&" check being made, so Coverity believed
      that it could be possible for a NULL 'xmlopt'.
      
      Checking the various calling paths seemingly disproves that. If called
      from virDomainDeviceDefParse, there were two other possible calls that
      would end up dereffing, so that path could not be NULL. If called via
      virDomainDefPostParseDeviceIterator via virDomainDefPostParse there
      are two callers (virDomainDefParseXML and qemuParseCommandLine)
      which deref xmlopt either directly or through another call.
      
      So I'm removing the check for non-NULL xmlopt.
      a16871fe
  5. 04 8月, 2015 10 次提交
  6. 25 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      conf: add virDomainControllerDefNew() · e1431072
      Laine Stump 提交于
      There are some non-0 default values in virDomainControllerDef (and
      will soon be more) that are easier to not forget if the remembering is
      done by a single initializer function (rather than inline code after
      allocating the obejct with generic VIR_ALLOC().
      e1431072
  7. 20 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      qemu: Reject updating unsupported disk information · 717c99f3
      Martin Kletzander 提交于
      If one calls update-device with information that is not updatable,
      libvirt reports success even though no data were updated.  The example
      used in the bug linked below uses updating device with <boot order='2'/>
      which, in my opinion, is a valid thing to request from user's
      perspective.  Mainly since we properly error out if user wants to update
      such data on a network device for example.
      
      And since there are many things that might happen (update-device on disk
      basically knows just how to change removable media), check for what's
      changing and moreover, since the function might be usable in other
      drivers (updating only disk path is a valid possibility) let's abstract
      it for any two disks.
      
      We can't possibly check for everything since for many fields our code
      does not properly differentiate between default and unspecified values.
      Even though this could be changed, I don't feel like it's worth the
      complexity so it's not the aim of this patch.
      
      Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007228
      717c99f3
  8. 10 7月, 2015 3 次提交
  9. 09 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  10. 08 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 01 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      conf: qemu: Taint VMs using custom device tree blob · 4b48ba4a
      Peter Krempa 提交于
      Using a custom device tree image may cause unexpected behavior in
      architectures that use this approach to detect platform devices. Since
      usually the device tree is generated by qemu and thus it's not normally
      used let's taint VMs using it to make it obvious as a possible source of
      problems.
      4b48ba4a
  12. 30 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      conf: Validate disk lun using correct types · c79ebf53
      John Ferlan 提交于
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201143
      
      The formatdomain.html description for <disk> device 'lun' indicates that
      it must be either a type 'block' or type 'network' with protocol 'iscsi';
      however, we did not make that check until domain startup.
      
      This caused issues for virt-manager which had an unexpected failure at
      run time rather config time.
      
      This patch adds a check in post part disk device checking for the specific
      and supported lun types as well as adjusting the test failure to be for
      parse config rather than run time.
      c79ebf53
  13. 26 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 24 6月, 2015 5 次提交
  15. 23 6月, 2015 3 次提交
  16. 19 6月, 2015 2 次提交
  17. 18 6月, 2015 2 次提交