Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

This was entirely automated, using the script by Al:

  PATT='^[[:blank:]]*#[[:blank:]]*include[[:blank:]]*<asm/uaccess.h>'
  sed -i -e "s!$PATT!#include <linux/uaccess.h>!" \
        $(git grep -l "$PATT"|grep -v ^include/linux/uaccess.h)

to do the replacement at the end of the merge window.
Requested-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

sparse says:

    fs/ufs/inode.c:1195:6: warning: symbol 'ufs_truncate_blocks' was not declared. Should it be static?

Note that the forward declaration in the file is already marked static.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Add a helper function that clears buffer heads from a block device
aliasing passed bh. Use this helper function from filesystems instead of
the original unmap_underlying_metadata() to save some boiler plate code
and also have a better name for the functionalily since it is not
unmapping anything for a *long* time.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

CURRENT_TIME_SEC is not y2038 safe. current_time() will
be transitioned to use 64 bit time along with vfs in a
separate patch.
There is no plan to transistion CURRENT_TIME_SEC to use
y2038 safe time interfaces.

current_time() will also be extended to use superblock
range checking parameters when range checking is introduced.

This works because alloc_super() fills in the the s_time_gran
in super block to NSEC_PER_SEC.
Signed-off-by: NDeepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

inode_change_ok() will be resposible for clearing capabilities and IMA
extended attributes and as such will need dentry. Give it as an argument
to inode_change_ok() instead of an inode. Also rename inode_change_ok()
to setattr_prepare() to better relect that it does also some
modifications in addition to checks.
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

kmap() in page_follow_link_light() needed to go - allowing to hold
an arbitrary number of kmaps for long is a great way to deadlocking
the system.

new helper (inode_nohighmem(inode)) needs to be used for pagecache
symlinks inodes; done for all in-tree cases.  page_follow_link_light()
instrumented to yell about anything missed.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

It was to needed for a couple of months in 2010, until UFS
quota support got dropped.  Since then it's equivalent to
simple_setattr() (i.e. the default) for everything except the
regular files.  And dropping it there allows to convert all
UFS symlinks to {page,simple}_symlink_inode_operations, getting
rid of fs/ufs/symlink.c completely.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Just pass NULL as locked_page in case of first block in the indirect
chain.  Old calling conventions aside, a reason for having 'phys'
was that ufs_inode_getfrag() used to be able to do _two_ allocations
- indirect block and extending/reallocating a tail.  We needed
locked_page for the latter (it's a data), but we also needed to
figure out that indirect block is metadata.  So we used to pass
non-NULL locked_page in all cases *and* used NULL phys as
indication of being asked to allocate an indirect.

With tail unpacking taken into a separate function we don't need
those convolutions anymore.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... and not "write to beginning of the disk", TYVM...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

same story as with ufs_inode_getblock()
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

ufs_extend_tail() is handling that now.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... instead of messing with buffer_head.  We can bloody well do
sb_bread() in there.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

The value passed to ufs_inode_getblock() as the 3rd argument
had lower bits ignored; the upper bits were shifted down
and used and they actually make sense - those are _lower_ bits
of index in indirect block (i.e. they form the index within
a fragment within an indirect block).

Pass those as argument.  Upper bits of index (i.e. the number
of fragment within indirect block) will join them shortly.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

just return the damn block number
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

These calling conventions are rudiments of pre-2.3 times; they
really need to be sanitized.  This is the first step; next
will be _always_ returning a block number, instead of this
"return a pointer to buffer_head, except when we get to the
actual data" crap.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

we'd already calculated it...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... and massage ufs_frag_map() to take those instead of fragment number.

As it is, we duplicate the damn thing on the write side, open-coded and
bloody hard to follow.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

We are holding ->truncate_mutex, so nobody else can alter our
block pointers.  Rechecks/retries were needed back when we
only held BKL there, and had to cope with write_begin/writepage
and writepage/truncate races.  Can't happen anymore...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

There's a case when an indirect block gets dirtied for no good
reason - when there's a hole starting in the middle of area
covered by it and spanning past its end, and truncate() is done
precisely to the beginning of the hole.

The block is obviously not modified at all - all removals happen
beyond it.  However, existing code ends up dirtying it just in
case.  It's trivial to fix and while it's not a real bug by any
stretch of imagination, it makes the damn thing harder to follow.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Note that it's already made unreachable from the inode, so we don't have
to worry about ufs_frag_map() walking into something already freed.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Have caller fetch the block number *and* remove it from wherever
it was.  Pass the block number instead.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

turn recursion into a pair of loops
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

We always have 0 < depth2 <= depth in there, so
if (--depth) {
	if (--depth2)
		A
	B
} else {
	C // not using depth2
}
D // not using depth2

is equivalent to

if (--depth2)
	A with s/depth/depth - 1/
if (--depth)
	B
else
	C
D
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

open-coded in several places...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

For calls in __ufs_truncate_blocks() it's just a matter of not
incrementing offsets[0] and not making that call - immediately
following loop will be executed one extra time and we'll be just
fine.  For recursive call in ufs_trunc_branch() itself, just
assing NULL to offsets if we would be about to make such call.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

... and turn the switch into if (), since all cases with
depth != 1 have just become identical.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Instead of manually checking that the array contains only zeroes,
find the position of the last non-zero (in __ufs_truncate(), where
we can conveniently do that) and use that to tell if there's
any non-zero in the array tail passed to ufs_trunc_...indirect().

The goal of all that clumsiness is to get fold these functions
together.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

rather than bitslicing the offset just formed as sum of shifted indices,
pass the array of those indices itself.  NULL is used as equivalent
of "all zeroes" (== free the entire branch).
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

same as the previous two.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>