提交 · 2eadb9e75e8e65eaf3e17628e24798a3c5374f90 · openeuler / Kernel

23 8月, 2021 1 次提交

btrfs: make btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc private to block-group.c · 2eadb9e7

由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 7月 05, 2021

One of the final things that must be done to add a new chunk is
inserting its device extent items in the device tree. They describe
the portion of allocated device physical space during phase 1 of
chunk allocation. This is currently done in btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc
whose name isn't very informative. What's more, this function is only
used in block-group.c but is defined as public. There isn't anything
special about it that would warrant it being defined in volumes.c.

Just move btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc and alloc_chunk_dev_extent to
block-group.c, make the former static and rename both functions to
insert_dev_extents and insert_dev_extent respectively.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

2eadb9e7

29 7月, 2021 1 次提交

btrfs: fix rw device counting in __btrfs_free_extra_devids · b2a61667

由 Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi 提交于 7月 27, 2021

When removing a writeable device in __btrfs_free_extra_devids, the rw
device count should be decremented.

This error was caught by Syzbot which reported a warning in
close_fs_devices:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9355 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168 close_fs_devices+0x763/0x880 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 9355 Comm: syz-executor552 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  RIP: 0010:close_fs_devices+0x763/0x880 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000333f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010293
  RAX: ffffffff8365f5c3 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888029afd4c0
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffff88802846f508 R08: ffffffff8365f525 R09: ffffed100337d128
  R10: ffffed100337d128 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: dffffc0000000000
  R13: ffff888019be8868 R14: 1ffff1100337d10d R15: 1ffff1100337d10a
  FS:  00007f6f53828700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 000000000047c410 CR3: 00000000302a6000 CR4: 00000000001506f0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  Call Trace:
   btrfs_close_devices+0xc9/0x450 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1180
   open_ctree+0x8e1/0x3968 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3693
   btrfs_fill_super fs/btrfs/super.c:1382 [inline]
   btrfs_mount_root+0xac5/0xc60 fs/btrfs/super.c:1749
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1498
   fc_mount fs/namespace.c:993 [inline]
   vfs_kern_mount+0xc9/0x160 fs/namespace.c:1023
   btrfs_mount+0x3d3/0xb50 fs/btrfs/super.c:1809
   legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592
   vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1498
   do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2905 [inline]
   path_mount+0x196f/0x2be0 fs/namespace.c:3235
   do_mount fs/namespace.c:3248 [inline]
   __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3456 [inline]
   __se_sys_mount+0x2f9/0x3b0 fs/namespace.c:3433
   do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Because fs_devices->rw_devices was not 0 after
closing all devices. Here is the call trace that was observed:

  btrfs_mount_root():
    btrfs_scan_one_device():
      device_list_add();   <---------------- device added
    btrfs_open_devices():
      open_fs_devices():
        btrfs_open_one_device();   <-------- writable device opened,
	                                     rw device count ++
    btrfs_fill_super():
      open_ctree():
        btrfs_free_extra_devids():
	  __btrfs_free_extra_devids();  <--- writable device removed,
	                              rw device count not decremented
	  fail_tree_roots:
	    btrfs_close_devices():
	      close_fs_devices();   <------- rw device count off by 1

As a note, prior to commit cf89af14 ("btrfs: dev-replace: fail
mount if we don't have replace item with target device"), rw_devices
was decremented on removing a writable device in
__btrfs_free_extra_devids only if the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit
was not set for the device. However, this check does not need to be
reinstated as it is now redundant and incorrect.

In __btrfs_free_extra_devids, we skip removing the device if it is the
target for replacement. This is done by checking whether device->devid
== BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID. Since BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT is set
only on the device with devid BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID, no devices
should have the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit set after the check,
and so it's redundant to test for that bit.

Additionally, following commit 82372bc8 ("Btrfs: make
the logic of source device removing more clear"), rw_devices is
incremented whenever a writeable device is added to the alloc
list (including the target device in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing), so
all removals of writable devices from the alloc list should also be
accompanied by a decrement to rw_devices.

Reported-by: syzbot+a70e2ad0879f160b9217@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: cf89af14 ("btrfs: dev-replace: fail mount if we don't have replace item with target device")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Tested-by: syzbot+a70e2ad0879f160b9217@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDesmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

b2a61667

07 7月, 2021 1 次提交

btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array · 79bd3712

由 Filipe Manana 提交于 6月 29, 2021

Commit eafa4fd0 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array
due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in
exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many
tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the
first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished
their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks
being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate
tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K.

However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of
the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system
chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent
buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not
making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the
subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving
system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it
and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while
the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common.

This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array
exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk
allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the
insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while
under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the
same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates
a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way
we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes.

The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps
reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree.

For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains,
because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree.
Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk
removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes
to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond
to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these
other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree
right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk
allocation and chunk removal do.

The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition
of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and
removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior
that did not change.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Tested-by: NShin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

79bd3712

22 6月, 2021 2 次提交

btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running · 1cea5cf0

由 Filipe Manana 提交于 6月 21, 2021

Relocation and send do not play well together because while send is
running a block group can be relocated, a transaction committed and
the respective disk extents get re-allocated and written to or discarded
while send is about to do something with the extents.

This was explained in commit 9e967495 ("Btrfs: prevent send failures
and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), which prevented balance and
send from running in parallel but it did not address one remaining case
where chunk relocation can happen: shrinking a device (and device deletion
which shrinks a device's size to 0 before deleting the device).

We also have now one more case where relocation is triggered: on zoned
filesystems partially used block groups get relocated by a background
thread, introduced in commit 18bb8bbf ("btrfs: zoned: automatically
reclaim zones").

So make sure that instead of preventing balance from running when there
are ongoing send operations, we prevent relocation from happening.
This uses the infrastructure recently added by a patch that has the
subject: "btrfs: add cancellable chunk relocation support".

Also it adds a spinlock used exclusively for the exclusivity between
send and relocation, as before fs_info->balance_mutex was used, which
would make an attempt to run send to block waiting for balance to
finish, which can take a lot of time on large filesystems.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1cea5cf0

btrfs: fix typos in comments · 1a9fd417

由 David Sterba 提交于 5月 21, 2021

Fix typos that have snuck in since the last round. Found by codespell.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1a9fd417

21 6月, 2021 2 次提交

btrfs: remove the unused parameter @len for btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe() · 43c0d1a5

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 4月 13, 2021

The parameter @len is not really used in btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe(),
just remove it.

It got removed in 42034313 ("btrfs: let callers of
btrfs_get_io_geometry pass the em"), before that btrfs_get_chunk_map
utilized it.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

43c0d1a5

btrfs: remove stale comment for argument seed of btrfs_find_device · 94358c35

由 Su Yue 提交于 4月 25, 2021

Commit b2598edf ("btrfs: remove unused argument seed from
btrfs_find_device") removed the argument seed from btrfs_find_device
but forgot the comment, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NSu Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

94358c35

01 6月, 2021 1 次提交

block: move bd_mutex to struct gendisk · a8698707

由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 5月 25, 2021

Replace the per-block device bd_mutex with a per-gendisk open_mutex,
thus simplifying locking wherever we deal with partitions.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NRoger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210525061301.2242282-4-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

a8698707

14 5月, 2021 1 次提交

btrfs: return 0 for dev_extent_hole_check_zoned hole_start in case of error · d6f67afb

由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 5月 10, 2021

Commit 7000babd ("btrfs: assign proper values to a bool variable in
dev_extent_hole_check_zoned") assigned false to the hole_start parameter
of dev_extent_hole_check_zoned().

The hole_start parameter is not boolean and returns the start location of
the found hole.

Fixes: 7000babd ("btrfs: assign proper values to a bool variable in dev_extent_hole_check_zoned")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

d6f67afb

21 4月, 2021 4 次提交

btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones · 18bb8bbf

由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 4月 19, 2021

When a file gets deleted on a zoned file system, the space freed is not
returned back into the block group's free space, but is migrated to
zone_unusable.

As this zone_unusable space is behind the current write pointer it is not
possible to use it for new allocations. In the current implementation a
zone is reset once all of the block group's space is accounted as zone
unusable.

This behaviour can lead to premature ENOSPC errors on a busy file system.

Instead of only reclaiming the zone once it is completely unusable,
kick off a reclaim job once the amount of unusable bytes exceeds a user
configurable threshold between 51% and 100%. It can be set per mounted
filesystem via the sysfs tunable bg_reclaim_threshold which is set to 75%
by default.

Similar to reclaiming unused block groups, these dirty block groups are
added to a to_reclaim list and then on a transaction commit, the reclaim
process is triggered but after we deleted unused block groups, which will
free space for the relocation process.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

18bb8bbf

btrfs: rename delete_unused_bgs_mutex to reclaim_bgs_lock · f3372065

由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 4月 19, 2021

As a preparation for extending the block group deletion use case, rename
the unused_bgs_mutex to reclaim_bgs_lock.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

f3372065

btrfs: zoned: reset zones of relocated block groups · 01e86008

由 Johannes Thumshirn 提交于 4月 19, 2021

When relocating a block group the freed up space is not discarded in one
big block, but each extent is discarded on its own with -odisard=sync.

For a zoned filesystem we need to discard the whole block group at once,
so btrfs_discard_extent() will translate the discard into a
REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET operation, which then resets the device's zone.
Failure to reset the zone is not fatal error.

Discussion about the approach and regarding transaction blocking:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H4SjS_d5rBepfTMhU8Th3bJzdmyYd0g4Z60yUgC_rC_ZA@mail.gmail.com/Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

01e86008

btrfs: more graceful errors/warnings on 32bit systems when reaching limits · e9306ad4

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 2月 25, 2021

Btrfs uses internally mapped u64 address space for all its metadata.
Due to the page cache limit on 32bit systems, btrfs can't access
metadata at or beyond (ULONG_MAX + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT. See
how MAX_LFS_FILESIZE and page::index are defined. This is 16T for 4K
page size while 256T for 64K page size.

Users can have a filesystem which doesn't have metadata beyond the
boundary at mount time, but later balance can cause it to create
metadata beyond the boundary.

And modification to MM layer is unrealistic just for such minor use
case. We can't do more than to prevent mounting such filesystem or warn
early when the numbers are still within the limits.

To address such problem, this patch will introduce the following checks:

- Mount time rejection
This will reject any fs which has metadata chunk at or beyond the
boundary.

- Mount time early warning
If there is any metadata chunk beyond 5/8th of the boundary, we do an
early warning and hope the end user will see it.

- Runtime extent buffer rejection
If we're going to allocate an extent buffer at or beyond the boundary,
reject such request with EOVERFLOW.
This is definitely going to cause problems like transaction abort, but
we have no better ways.

- Runtime extent buffer early warning
If an extent buffer beyond 5/8th of the max file size is allocated, do
an early warning.

Above error/warning message will only be printed once for each fs to
reduce dmesg flood.

If the mount is rejected, the filesystem will be mountable only on a
64bit host.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/1783f16d-7a28-80e6-4c32-fdf19b705ed0@gmx.com/Reported-by: NErik Jensen <erikjensen@rkjnsn.net>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

e9306ad4

19 4月, 2021 2 次提交

btrfs: zoned: bail out in btrfs_alloc_chunk for bad input · bb05b298

由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 3月 23, 2021

gcc complains that the ctl->max_chunk_size member might be used
uninitialized when none of the three conditions for initializing it in
init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned() are true:

In function ‘init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned’,
    inlined from ‘init_alloc_chunk_ctl’ at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5023:3,
    inlined from ‘btrfs_alloc_chunk’ at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5340:2:
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:48:45: error: ‘ctl.max_chunk_size’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
 4998 |         ctl->max_chunk_size = min(limit, ctl->max_chunk_size);
      |                               ^~~
fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function ‘btrfs_alloc_chunk’:
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5316:32: note: ‘ctl’ declared here
 5316 |         struct alloc_chunk_ctl ctl;
      |                                ^~~

If we ever get into this condition, something is seriously
wrong, as validity is checked in the callers

  btrfs_alloc_chunk
    init_alloc_chunk_ctl
      init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_zoned

so the same logic as in init_alloc_chunk_ctl_policy_regular()
and a few other places should be applied. This avoids both further
data corruption, and the compile-time warning.

Fixes: 1cd6121f ("btrfs: zoned: implement zoned chunk allocator")
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

bb05b298

btrfs: assign proper values to a bool variable in dev_extent_hole_check_zoned · 7000babd

由 Jiapeng Chong 提交于 3月 03, 2021

Fix the following coccicheck warnings:

./fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1462:10-11: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function
'dev_extent_hole_check_zoned' with return type bool.
Reported-by: NAbaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

7000babd

09 4月, 2021 1 次提交

treewide: Change list_sort to use const pointers · 4f0f586b

由 Sami Tolvanen 提交于 4月 08, 2021

list_sort() internally casts the comparison function passed to it
to a different type with constant struct list_head pointers, and
uses this pointer to call the functions, which trips indirect call
Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) checking.

Instead of removing the consts, this change defines the
list_cmp_func_t type and changes the comparison function types of
all list_sort() callers to use const pointers, thus avoiding type
mismatches.
Suggested-by: NNick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NSami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NNick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: NNick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: NNathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210408182843.1754385-10-samitolvanen@google.com

4f0f586b

18 3月, 2021 1 次提交

btrfs: do not initialize dev stats if we have no dev_root · 82d62d06

由 Josef Bacik 提交于 3月 11, 2021

Neal reported a panic trying to use -o rescue=all

  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 4095 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-0.rc7.149.fc34.x86_64 #1
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_device_init_dev_stats+0x4c/0x1f0
  RSP: 0018:ffffa60285fbfb68 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88b88f806498 RCX: ffff88b82e7a2a10
  RDX: ffffa60285fbfb97 RSI: ffff88b82e7a2a10 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: ffff88b88f806b3c R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: ffff88b82e7a2a10 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88b88f806a00
  R13: ffff88b88f806478 R14: ffff88b88f806a00 R15: ffff88b82e7a2a10
  FS:  00007f698be1ec40(0000) GS:ffff88b937e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000092c9c006 CR4: 00000000003706f0
  Call Trace:
  ? btrfs_init_dev_stats+0x1f/0xf0
  btrfs_init_dev_stats+0x62/0xf0
  open_ctree+0x1019/0x15ff
  btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x13/0xfa
  legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40
  vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0
  vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
  btrfs_mount+0x131/0x3d0
  ? legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40
  ? btrfs_show_options+0x640/0x640
  legacy_get_tree+0x27/0x40
  vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xb0
  path_mount+0x441/0xa80
  __x64_sys_mount+0xf4/0x130
  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x7f698c04e52e

This happens because we unconditionally attempt to initialize device
stats on mount, but we may not have been able to read the device root.
Fix this by skipping initializing the device stats if we do not have a
device root.
Reported-by: NNeal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.11+
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

82d62d06

09 2月, 2021 10 次提交

btrfs: zoned: relocate block group to repair IO failure in zoned filesystems · f7ef5287