提交 f7ef5287 编写于 作者: N Naohiro Aota 提交者: David Sterba

btrfs: zoned: relocate block group to repair IO failure in zoned filesystems

When a bad checksum is found and if the filesystem has a mirror of the
damaged data, we read the correct data from the mirror and writes it to
damaged blocks. This however, violates the sequential write constraints
of a zoned block device.

We can consider three methods to repair an IO failure in zoned filesystems:

(1) Reset and rewrite the damaged zone
(2) Allocate new device extent and replace the damaged device extent to
    the new extent
(3) Relocate the corresponding block group

Method (1) is most similar to a behavior done with regular devices.
However, it also wipes non-damaged data in the same device extent, and
so it unnecessary degrades non-damaged data.

Method (2) is much like device replacing but done in the same device. It
is safe because it keeps the device extent until the replacing finish.
However, extending device replacing is non-trivial. It assumes
"src_dev->physical == dst_dev->physical". Also, the extent mapping
replacing function should be extended to support replacing device extent
position in one device.

Method (3) invokes relocation of the damaged block group and is
straightforward to implement. It relocates all the mirrored device
extents, so it potentially is a more costly operation than method (1) or
(2). But it relocates only used extents which reduce the total IO size.

Let's apply method (3) for now. In the future, we can extend device-replace
and apply method (2).

For protecting a block group gets relocated multiple time with multiple
IO errors, this commit introduces "relocating_repair" bit to show it's
now relocating to repair IO failures. Also it uses a new kthread
"btrfs-relocating-repair", not to block IO path with relocating process.

This commit also supports repairing in the scrub process.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
上级 32430c61
......@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct btrfs_block_group {
unsigned int has_caching_ctl:1;
unsigned int removed:1;
unsigned int to_copy:1;
unsigned int relocating_repair:1;
int disk_cache_state;
......
......@@ -2260,6 +2260,9 @@ int repair_io_failure(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 ino, u64 start,
ASSERT(!(fs_info->sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY));
BUG_ON(!mirror_num);
if (btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info))
return btrfs_repair_one_zone(fs_info, logical);
bio = btrfs_io_bio_alloc(1);
bio->bi_iter.bi_size = 0;
map_length = length;
......
......@@ -857,6 +857,9 @@ static int scrub_handle_errored_block(struct scrub_block *sblock_to_check)
have_csum = sblock_to_check->pagev[0]->have_csum;
dev = sblock_to_check->pagev[0]->dev;
if (btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info) && !sctx->is_dev_replace)
return btrfs_repair_one_zone(fs_info, logical);
/*
* We must use GFP_NOFS because the scrub task might be waiting for a
* worker task executing this function and in turn a transaction commit
......
......@@ -7980,3 +7980,75 @@ bool btrfs_pinned_by_swapfile(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, void *ptr)
spin_unlock(&fs_info->swapfile_pins_lock);
return node != NULL;
}
static int relocating_repair_kthread(void *data)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *cache = (struct btrfs_block_group *)data;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = cache->fs_info;
u64 target;
int ret = 0;
target = cache->start;
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE)) {
btrfs_info(fs_info,
"zoned: skip relocating block group %llu to repair: EBUSY",
target);
return -EBUSY;
}
mutex_lock(&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex);
/* Ensure block group still exists */
cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, target);
if (!cache)
goto out;
if (!cache->relocating_repair)
goto out;
ret = btrfs_may_alloc_data_chunk(fs_info, target);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
btrfs_info(fs_info,
"zoned: relocating block group %llu to repair IO failure",
target);
ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(fs_info, target);
out:
if (cache)
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex);
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_repair_one_zone(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 logical)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
/* Do not attempt to repair in degraded state */
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, DEGRADED))
return 0;
cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, logical);
if (!cache)
return 0;
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (cache->relocating_repair) {
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
return 0;
}
cache->relocating_repair = 1;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
kthread_run(relocating_repair_kthread, cache,
"btrfs-relocating-repair");
return 0;
}
......@@ -599,5 +599,6 @@ void btrfs_scratch_superblocks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
int btrfs_bg_type_to_factor(u64 flags);
const char *btrfs_bg_type_to_raid_name(u64 flags);
int btrfs_verify_dev_extents(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
int btrfs_repair_one_zone(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 logical);
#endif
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册