- 03 9月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Chris has decided that enough is enough. It's time to fixup dev Vs dev_priv. This is a modest contribution to the crusade. v2: Still use INTEL_INFO(), for the (mythical!) case we want to hardcode the info struct with defines (Chris) Rename the macro argument from 'dev' to 'dev_priv' (Jani) v3: Use names unlikely to be used as macro arguments (Chris) Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Make backlight class sysfs brightness 0 value switch off the backlight for connectors that have the backlight_power callback defined. For eDP, this has the similar caveats regarding power savings as bl_power as only the power sequencer backlight control is switched off. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed_by: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Make backlight class sysfs bl_power a sub-state of backlight enabled, if a backlight power connector callback is defined. It's up to the connector callback to handle the sub-state, typically in a way that respects panel power sequencing. v2: Post the version that does not oops. *facepalm*. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed_by: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Tested_by: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 27 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Scot Doyle 提交于
BIOS or firmware can modify hardware state during suspend/resume, for example on the Toshiba CB35 or Lenovo T400, so log a debug message instead of a warning if the backlight is unexpectedly enabled. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80930 Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NScot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Historically we've exposed the full backlight PWM duty cycle range to the userspace, in the name of "mechanism, not policy". However, it turns out there are both panels and board designs where there is a minimum duty cycle that is required for proper operation. The minimum duty cycle is available in the VBT. The backlight class sysfs interface does not make any promises to the userspace about the physical meaning of the range 0..max_brightness. Specifically there is no guarantee that 0 means off; indeed for acpi_backlight 0 usually is not off, but the minimum acceptable value. Respect the minimum backlight, and expose the range acceptable to the hardware as 0..max_brightness to the userspace via the backlight class device; 0 means the minimum acceptable enabled value. To switch off the backlight, the user must disable the encoder. As a side effect, make the backlight class device max brightness and physical PWM modulation frequency (i.e. max duty cycle) independent. This allows a follow-up patch to virtualize the max value exposed to the userspace. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> [danvet: s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 14 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This reverts commit 773875bf. It is very much needed and the lack of dithering has been reported by a large list of people with various gen2/3 hardware. Also, the original patch was complete non-sense since the WARNING backtraces in the references bugzilla are about gmch_pfit.lvds_border_bits mismatch, not at all about the dither bit. That one seems to work. Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Hans de Bruin <jmdebruin@xmsnet.nl> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 09 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Scot Doyle 提交于
commit c675949e Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Wed Apr 9 11:31:37 2014 +0300 drm/i915: do not setup backlight if not available according to VBT caused a regression on machines with a misconfigured VBT. Add a quirk to assert the presence of a controllable backlight. Use it to ignore the VBT backlight presence check during backlight setup. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79813Tested-by: NJames Duley <jagduley@gmail.com> Tested-by: NMichael Mullin <masmullin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NScot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15 only [danvet: Add cc: stable because the regressing commit is in 3.15.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 11 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
For reasons I can't claim to fully understand gen4 seems to require backlight duty cycle setting after the backlight has been enabled, or else black screen follows. I don't have documentation for the correct sequence on gen4 either. Confirmed on Dell Latitude D630 and MacBook4,1. This fixes a regression introduced by commit b35684b8 Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Thu Nov 14 12:13:41 2013 +0200 drm/i915: do full backlight setup at enable time Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75791 Reported-and-tested-by: mcy@lm7.fr Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79423Reported-and-tested-by: NMarc Milgram <mmilgram@redhat.com> Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rob Clark 提交于
For atomic, it will be quite necessary to not need to care so much about locking order. And 'state' gives us a convenient place to stash a ww_ctx for any sort of update that needs to grab multiple crtc locks. Because we will want to eventually make locking even more fine grained (giving locks to planes, connectors, etc), split out drm_modeset_lock and drm_modeset_acquire_ctx to track acquired locks. Atomic will use this to keep track of which locks have been acquired in a transaction. v1: original v2: remove a few things not needed until atomic, for now v3: update for v3 of connection_mutex patch.. v4: squash in docbook v5: doc tweaks/fixes Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
- 04 6月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
After the split-out of crtc locks from the big mode_config.mutex there's still two major areas it protects: - Various connector probe states, like connector->status, EDID properties, probed mode lists and similar information. - The links from connector->encoder and encoder->crtc and other modeset-relevant connector state (e.g. properties which control the panel fitter). The later is used by modeset operations. But they don't really care about the former since it's allowed to e.g. enable a disconnected VGA output or with a mode not in the probed list. Thus far this hasn't been a problem, but for the atomic modeset conversion Rob Clark needs to convert all modeset relevant locks into w/w locks. This is required because the order of acquisition is determined by how userspace supplies the atomic modeset data. This has run into troubles in the detect path since the i915 load detect code needs _both_ protections offered by the mode_config.mutex: It updates probe state and it needs to change the modeset configuration to enable the temporary load detect pipe. The big deal here is that for the probe/detect users of this lock a plain mutex fits best, but for atomic modesets we really want a w/w mutex. To fix this lets split out a new connection_mutex lock for the modeset relevant parts. For simplicity I've decided to only add one additional lock for all connector/encoder links and modeset configuration states. We have piles of different modeset objects in addition to those (like bridges or panels), so adding per-object locks would be much more effort. Also, we're guaranteed (at least for now) to do a full modeset if we need to acquire this lock. Which means that fine-grained locking is fairly irrelevant compared to the amount of time the full modeset will take. I've done a full audit, and there's just a few things that justify special focus: - Locking in drm_sysfs.c is almost completely absent. We should sprinkle mode_config.connection_mutex over this file a bit, but since it already lacks mode_config.mutex this patch wont make the situation any worse. This is material for a follow-up patch. - omap has a omap_framebuffer_flush function which walks the connector->encoder->crtc links and is called from many contexts. Some look like they don't acquire mode_config.mutex, so this is already racy. Again fixing this is material for a separate patch. - The radeon hot_plug function to retrain DP links looks at connector->dpms. Currently this happens without any locking, so is already racy. I think radeon_hotplug_work_func should gain mutex_lock/unlock calls for the mode_config.connection_mutex. - Same applies to i915's intel_dp_hot_plug. But again, this is already racy. - i915 load_detect code needs to acquire this lock. Which means the w/w dance due to Rob's work will be nicely contained to _just_ this function. I've added fixme comments everywhere where it looks suspicious but in the sysfs code. After a quick irc discussion with Dave Airlie it sounds like the lack of locking in there is due to sysfs cleanup fun at module unload. v1: original (only compile tested) v2: missing mutex_init(), etc (from Rob Clark) v3: i915 needs more care in the conversion: - Protect the edp pp logic with the connection_mutex. - Use connection_mutex in the backlight code due to get_pipe_from_connector. - Use drm_modeset_lock_all in suspend/resume paths. - Update lock checks in the overlay code. Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Generated using semantic patches: @@ expression E; @@ - drm_get_connector_name(&E) + E.name @@ expression E; @@ - drm_get_connector_name(E) + E->name v2: Turn drm_get_connector_name(&E) into E.name instead of &(E)->name. Acked-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
- 21 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Somehow a few functions have been dropped in the middle of backlight code. Move them around. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 15 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
When we set backlight on behalf of ACPI opregion, we will convert the backlight value in the 0-255 range defined in opregion to the actual hardware level. Commit 22505b82 (drm/i915: avoid brightness overflow when doing scale) is meant to fix the overflow problem when doing the conversion, but it also caused a problem that the converted hardware level doesn't quite represent the intended value: say user wants maximum backlight level(255 in opregion's range), then we will calculate the actual hardware level to be: level = freq / max * level, where freq is the hardware's max backlight level(937 on an user's box), and max and level are all 255. The converted value should be 937 but the above calculation will yield 765. To fix this issue, just use 64 bits to do the calculation to keep the precision and avoid overflow at the same time. Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72491Reported-by: NNico Schottelius <nico-bugzilla.kernel.org@schottelius.org> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Apparently we really only need this when the pfit is enabled, at least I couldn't dicern any difference here. Furthermore the hacks we have to reconstruct this bit is a bit glaring, and probably only works because we can't move the lvds port to any other pipe than pipe B on gen2/3. So let's just rip this out. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77137 (the LVDS WARNING log, not the main "VGA can't be turned on" issue). Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 11 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Some machines use an external EC for controlling the backlight. Info about this is present in the VBT. Do not setup native backlight control if no PWM backlight is available or supported according to VBT. The acpi_backlight interface appears to work for the EC control. In most cases there has been no harm done, but it looks like there are machines out there that have both an EC and our PWM line connected to the same wire. This, obviously, does not end well. This should fix the regression caused by commit bc0bb9fd Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Thu Nov 14 12:14:29 2013 +0200 drm/i915: remove QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE AFAICT the quirk removed by the above commit effectively resulted in i915 not driving the backlight PWM output, thus not messing things up. Additionally this should fix the regression caused by commit fbc9fe1b Author: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Date: Fri Oct 11 21:27:45 2013 +0800 ACPI / video: Do not register backlight if win8 and native interface exists which left some machines without a functioning backlight interface. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76276 Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47941 Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62281 CC: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> CC: Eric Griffith <EGriffith92@gmail.com> CC: Kent Baxley <kent.baxley@canonical.com> Tested-by: NKamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Tested-by: NMartin <bugs@mrvanes.com> Tested-by: jrg.otte@gmail.com Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 03 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
i915gm and i945gm also seem to use and need the legacy combination mode bit in BLC_PWM_CTL. v2: Also do this for i915gm (Ville). Reported-and-tested-by: NLuis Ortega <luiorpe1@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75001Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vandana Kannan 提交于
Instead of modifying intel_panel in lvds_init_connector/dsi_init/ edp_init_connector, making changes to move intel_panel->downclock_mode initialization to intel_panel_init() v2: Jani's review comments incorporated Removed downclock_mode local variable in dsi_init and edp_init_connector Signed-off-by: NVandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
With 20+ module parameters, I think referring to them via a struct improves clarity over just having a bunch of globals. While at it, move the parameter initialization and definitions into a new file i915_params.c to reduce clutter in i915_drv.c. Apart from the ill-named i915_enable_rc6, i915_enable_fbc and i915_enable_ppgtt parameters, for which we lose the "i915_" prefix internally, the module parameters now look the same both on the kernel command line and in code. For example, "i915.modeset". The downsides of the change are losing static on a couple of variables and not having the initialization and module_param_named() right next to each other. On the other hand, all module parameters are now defined in one place at i915_params.c. Plus you can do this to find all module parameter references: $ git grep "i915\." -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915 v2: - move the definitions into a new file - s/i915_params/i915/ - make i915_try_reset i915.reset, for consistency Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 25 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This was forgotten in commit 565ee389 Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Wed Nov 13 12:56:29 2013 +0200 drm/i915: do not save/restore backlight registers in KMS Since the confusion was likely due to the duplicated definition for this pci config register, let's unify that, too. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 22 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
My 855gm doesn't register the intel backlight but it still ends up calling the backlight code to enable/disable the backlight via the LVDS code. This leads to some WARNs due to backlight.max being 0. Let's have intel_panel_enable_backlight() and intel_panel_disable_backlight() check whether there's a backlight present or not. Also move the backlight.present check from asle_set_backlight() into intel_panel_set_backlight() for some extra symmetry. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 11 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
These are needed when we cat the debugfs and sysfs files. V2: - Rebase V3: - Rebase V4: - Rebase Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 10 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vandana Kannan 提交于
If one mode of a internal panel has more than one refresh rate, then a reduced clock is found for the LFP (LVDS/eDP). This enables switching between low and high frequency dynamically. Moving downclock calculation to intel_panel so that it is common for LVDS and eDP. Signed-off-by: NVandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 14 11月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
No longer needed. We now have fully cached max backlight values. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The quirk was added as what I'd say was a stopgap measure in commit e85843be Author: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> Date: Fri Jul 19 15:02:01 2013 -0700 drm/i915: quirk no PCH_PWM_ENABLE for Dell XPS13 backlight without really digging into what was going on. Also, as mentioned in the related bug [1], having the quirk regressed some of the machines it was supposed to fix to begin with, and there were patches posted to disable the quirk on such machines [2]! The fact is, we do need the BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE bit set to have backlight. With the quirk, we've relied on BIOS to have set it, and our save/restore code to retain it. With the full backlight setup at enable, we have no place for things that rely on previous state. With the per platform hooks, we've also made a change in the PCH platform enable order: setting the backlight duty cycle between CPU and PCH PWM enable. Some experimenting and commit 770c1231 Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Date: Sat Aug 11 08:56:42 2012 +0200 drm/i915: Fix blank panel at reopening lid indicate that we can't set the backlight before enabling CPU PWM; the value just won't stick. But AFAICT we should do it before enabling the PCH PWM. Finally, any fallout we should fix properly, preferrably without quirks, and absolutely without quirks that rely on existing state. With the per platform hooks have much more flexibility to adjust the sequence as required by platforms. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47941 [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378229848-29113-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.comSigned-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
We should now have all the information we need to do a full initialization of the backlight registers. v2: Keep QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE for now (Imre). Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Prior to Haswell the CPU control register for backlight (BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL) toggled the PCH baclight pin for us. This made some sense as there was no pin on the CPU. With Haswell came the introduction of a CPU backlight pin, but the interface was still controlled by software with the same mechnism. Behind the scenes, hardware did all the dirty work for us. Broadwell no longer provides this for free. If we want to use the PCH backlight pin [1] then we have to set the override bit BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1 and program BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL2 for the PWM values. This patch implements that. This patch is compile tested only, and given that I rarely if ever touch this code, careful review is welcome. [1] According to Art, we know of no devices that exist which use the CPU pin (and remember it has existed already on HSW). If such a device does exist, we'll have to handle it properly - this is left as TODO until then. v2: Drop the abstraction prep patch, as a bigger backlight overhaul is in the works, and do just the mimimal bdw enabling now. (by Jani) CC: Art Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Prepare for being able to use the information at enable. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 13 11月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
We now have the max backlight value cached. Use it. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
This allows more flexibility in the ordering of the register writes, and lets us drop level setting altogether as necessary on a per platform basis. For gen2-gen3, this is the only thing that happens in enable/disable. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
It has per pipe registers. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Citing Jani's response to Imre's question in the review discussion: > According to the gen2/3 bspec I have, the correct mask is > BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK_PNV only in case of IS_PINEVIEW(dev), for > everything else it's BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK. What you say is correct, but we've treated all gen2/3 similar to PNV since commit ca88479c Author: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> Date: Fri Nov 18 11:09:24 2011 -0800 drm/i915: Treat pre-gen4 backlight duty cycle value consistently i.e. we only use the high 15 bits for all gen2/3. For non-PNV this just means the lowest bit is always zero. For PNV the lowest bit has a different meaning in both the PWM freq and duty cycle fields. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> [danvet: Make the commit message less empty.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
The backlight code has grown rather hairy, not least because the hardware registers and bits have repeatedly been shuffled around. And this isn't expected to get any easier with new hardware. Make things easier for our (read: my) poor brains, and split the code up into chip specific functions. There should be no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
ALthough usually there's only one connector that supports backlight, this also finds the correct connector. Before, we only updated the connector on pipe A, which might not be the one with backlight. (This only made a difference on BYT.) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Move from dev_priv to connector->panel. We still don't allow multiple sysfs interfaces, though. There should be no functional changes, except for a slight reordering of connector backlight and sysfs destroy calls. (This change happens now that the backlight device is actually per-connector, even though the destroy calls became per-connector earlier.) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
I've always felt the backlight device conditional build has been all backwards. Make it feel right. Gently move things towards connector based stuff while at it. There should be no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 07 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
With the connector and pipe passed around, we can now set the backlight on the right pipe on VLV/BYT. v2: drop combination mode check for VLV (Jani) add save/restore code for VLV backlight regs (Jani) check for existing modulation freq when initializing backlight regs (Jani) Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67245Tested-by: NJoe Konno <joe.konno@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
On VLV/BYT, backlight controls a per-pipe, so when adjusting the backlight we need to pass the correct info. So make the externally visible backlight functions take a connector argument, which can be used internally to figure out the pipe backlight to adjust. v2: make connector pipe lookup check for NULL crtc (Jani) fixup connector check in ASLE code (Jani) v3: make sure we take the mode config lock around lookups (Daniel) v4: fix double unlock in panel_get_brightness (Daniel) v5: push ASLE work into a work queue (Daniel) v6: separate ASLE work to a prep patch, rebase (Jani) Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 22 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Airlie 提交于
So drm was abusing device lifetimes, by having embedded device structures in the minor and connector it meant that the lifetime of the internal drm objects (drm_minor and drm_connector) were tied to the lifetime of the device files in sysfs, so if something kept those files opened the current code would kfree the objects and things would go downhill from there. Now in reality there is no need for these lifetimes to be so intertwined, especailly with hotplugging of devices where we wish to remove the sysfs and userspace facing pieces before we can unwind the internal objects due to open userspace files or mmaps, so split the objects out so the struct device is no longer embedded and do what fbdev does and just allocate and remove the sysfs inodes separately. Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Yet other direct usages of the pipe number instead of pipe_name(). We've been tracking them lately but managed to miss these last ones. v2: Catch them all! (Ville) Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (v1) Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-