提交 bc0bb9fd 编写于 作者: J Jani Nikula 提交者: Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: remove QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE

The quirk was added as what I'd say was a stopgap measure in

commit e85843be
Author: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 19 15:02:01 2013 -0700

    drm/i915: quirk no PCH_PWM_ENABLE for Dell XPS13 backlight

without really digging into what was going on.

Also, as mentioned in the related bug [1], having the quirk regressed
some of the machines it was supposed to fix to begin with, and there
were patches posted to disable the quirk on such machines [2]!

The fact is, we do need the BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE bit set to have
backlight. With the quirk, we've relied on BIOS to have set it, and our
save/restore code to retain it. With the full backlight setup at enable,
we have no place for things that rely on previous state.

With the per platform hooks, we've also made a change in the PCH
platform enable order: setting the backlight duty cycle between CPU and
PCH PWM enable. Some experimenting and

commit 770c1231
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Sat Aug 11 08:56:42 2012 +0200

    drm/i915: Fix blank panel at reopening lid

indicate that we can't set the backlight before enabling CPU PWM; the
value just won't stick. But AFAICT we should do it before enabling the
PCH PWM.

Finally, any fallout we should fix properly, preferrably without quirks,
and absolutely without quirks that rely on existing state. With the per
platform hooks have much more flexibility to adjust the sequence as
required by platforms.

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47941
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378229848-29113-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.comSigned-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
上级 b35684b8
......@@ -717,7 +717,6 @@ enum intel_sbi_destination {
#define QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE (1<<0)
#define QUIRK_LVDS_SSC_DISABLE (1<<1)
#define QUIRK_INVERT_BRIGHTNESS (1<<2)
#define QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE (1<<3)
struct intel_fbdev;
struct intel_fbc_work;
......
......@@ -10456,17 +10456,6 @@ static void quirk_invert_brightness(struct drm_device *dev)
DRM_INFO("applying inverted panel brightness quirk\n");
}
/*
* Some machines (Dell XPS13) suffer broken backlight controls if
* BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE is set.
*/
static void quirk_no_pcm_pwm_enable(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
dev_priv->quirks |= QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE;
DRM_INFO("applying no-PCH_PWM_ENABLE quirk\n");
}
struct intel_quirk {
int device;
int subsystem_vendor;
......@@ -10526,11 +10515,6 @@ static struct intel_quirk intel_quirks[] = {
* seem to use inverted backlight PWM.
*/
{ 0x2a42, 0x1025, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_invert_brightness },
/* Dell XPS13 HD Sandy Bridge */
{ 0x0116, 0x1028, 0x052e, quirk_no_pcm_pwm_enable },
/* Dell XPS13 HD and XPS13 FHD Ivy Bridge */
{ 0x0166, 0x1028, 0x058b, quirk_no_pcm_pwm_enable },
};
static void intel_init_quirks(struct drm_device *dev)
......
......@@ -749,10 +749,6 @@ static void pch_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
pch_ctl2 = panel->backlight.max << 16;
I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL2, pch_ctl2);
/* XXX: transitional */
if (dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE)
return;
pch_ctl1 = 0;
if (panel->backlight.active_low_pwm)
pch_ctl1 |= BLM_PCH_POLARITY;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册