- 14 12月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() use the bond lock to protect the bond slave list, it is no effect, so I could use RTNL or RCU to replace it, considering the performance impact, the RCU is more better here, so the bond lock replace with the RCU. The bond_select_active_slave() need RTNL and curr_slave_lock together, but there is no RTNL lock here, so add a rtnl_rtylock. Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond_mii_monitor() still use bond lock to protect bond slave list, it is no effect, I have 2 way to fix the problem, move the RTNL to the top of the function, or add RCU to protect the bond slave list, according to the Jay Vosburgh's opinion, 10 times one second is a truely big performance loss if use RTNL to protect the whole monitor, so I would take the advice and use RCU to protect the bond slave list. The bond_has_slave() will not protect by anything, there will no things happen if the slave list is be changed, unless the bond was free, but it will not happened before the monitor, the bond will closed before be freed. The peers notify for the bond will calling curr_active_slave, so derefence the slave to make sure we will accessing the same slave if the curr_active_slave changed, as the rcu dereference need in read-side critical sector and bond_change_active_slave() will call it with no RCU hold, so add peer notify in rcu_read_lock which will be nested in monitor. Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond slave list was no longer protected by bond lock and only protected by RTNL or RCU, so anywhere that use bond lock to protect slave list is meaningless. remove the release and acquire bond lock for bond_select_active_slave(). The curr_active_slave could only be changed in 3 place: 1. enslave slave. 2. release slave. 3. change_active_slave. all above place were holding bond lock, RTNL and curr_slave_lock together, it is tedious and meaningless, obviously bond lock is no need here, but RTNL or curr_slave_lock is needed, so if you want to access active slave, you have to choose one lock, RTNL or curr_slave_lock, if RTNL is exist, no need to add curr_slave_lock, otherwise curr_slave_lock is better, because of the performance. there are several place calling bond_select_active_slave() and bond_change_active_slave(), the next step I will clean these place and remove the no effect lock. there are some document changed together when update the function. Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
When I install the bonding with the wrong arp_ip_target, just like arp_ip_target=500.500.500.500, the arp_ip_target was transfored to 245.245.245.244 and stored in the ip target success, it is uncorrect, so I add checks to avoid adding wrong address. The in4_pton() will set wrong ip address to 0.0.0.0 and return 0, also use the micro IS_IP_TARGET_UNUSABLE_ADDRESS to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
Because the ARP monitoring is not support for 802.3ad, but I still could change the mode to 802.3ad from ab mode while ARP monitoring is running, it is incorrect. So add a check for 802.3ad in bonding_store_mode to fix the problem, and make a new macro BOND_NO_USES_ARP() to simplify the code. v2: according to the Dan Williams's suggestion, bond mode is the most important bond option, it should override any of the other sub-options. So when the mode is changed, the conficting values should be cleared or reset, otherwise the user has to duplicate more operations to modify the logic. I disable the arp and enable mii monitoring when the bond mode is changed to AB, TB and 8023AD if the arp interval is true. v3: according to the Nik's suggestion, the default value of miimon should need a name, there is several place to use it, and the bond_store_arp_interval() could use micro BOND_NO_USES_ARP to make the code more simpify. Suggested-by: NDan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> Suggested-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Aleksandrov 提交于
This patch aims to extend round-robin mode with a new option called packets_per_slave which can have the following values and effects: 0 - choose a random slave 1 (default) - standard round-robin, 1 packet per slave >1 - round-robin when >1 packets have been transmitted per slave The allowed values are between 0 and 65535. This patch also fixes the comment style in bond_xmit_roundrobin(). Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 10月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This reverts commit 4d961a10, reversing changes made to a00f6fcc. Revert bond locking changes, they cause regressions and Veaceslav Falico doesn't like how the commit messages were done at all. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it: 1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock. 2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock(). 3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored. so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it: 1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock. 2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock(). 3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored. so I remove the bond->lock and add the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it: 1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock. 2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock(). 3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored. so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
commit 991fb3f7 "dev: always advertise rx_flags changes via netlink" introduced rtnl notification from __dev_set_promiscuity(), which can be called in atomic context. Steps to reproduce: ip tuntap add dev tap1 mode tap ifconfig tap1 up tcpdump -nei tap1 & ip tuntap del dev tap1 mode tap [ 271.627994] device tap1 left promiscuous mode [ 271.639897] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:940 [ 271.664491] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3394, name: ip [ 271.677525] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 271.690503] CPU: 0 PID: 3394 Comm: ip Tainted: G W 3.12.0-rc3+ #73 [ 271.703996] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012 [ 271.731254] ffffffff81a58506 ffff8807f0d57a58 ffffffff817544e5 ffff88082fa0f428 [ 271.760261] ffff8808071f5f40 ffff8807f0d57a88 ffffffff8108bad1 ffffffff81110ff8 [ 271.790683] 0000000000000010 00000000000000d0 00000000000000d0 ffff8807f0d57af8 [ 271.822332] Call Trace: [ 271.838234] [<ffffffff817544e5>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76 [ 271.854446] [<ffffffff8108bad1>] __might_sleep+0x181/0x240 [ 271.870836] [<ffffffff81110ff8>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x68/0xb0 [ 271.887076] [<ffffffff811a80be>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x4e/0x2a0 [ 271.903368] [<ffffffff810b4ddc>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1dc/0x5a0 [ 271.919716] [<ffffffff81614d67>] ? __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0 [ 271.936088] [<ffffffff810b4de0>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1e0/0x5a0 [ 271.952504] [<ffffffff81614d67>] __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0 [ 271.968902] [<ffffffff8163a0b2>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x52/0x100 [ 271.985302] [<ffffffff8162ac6d>] __dev_notify_flags+0xad/0xc0 [ 272.001642] [<ffffffff8162ad0c>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x8c/0x1c0 [ 272.017917] [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380 [ 272.033961] [<ffffffff8162b109>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x29/0x50 [ 272.049855] [<ffffffff8172e937>] packet_dev_mc+0x87/0xc0 [ 272.065494] [<ffffffff81732052>] packet_notifier+0x1b2/0x380 [ 272.080915] [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380 [ 272.096009] [<ffffffff81761c66>] notifier_call_chain+0x66/0x150 [ 272.110803] [<ffffffff8108503e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [ 272.125468] [<ffffffff81085056>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [ 272.139984] [<ffffffff81620190>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x40/0x70 [ 272.154523] [<ffffffff816201d6>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x16/0x20 [ 272.168552] [<ffffffff816224c5>] rollback_registered_many+0x145/0x240 [ 272.182263] [<ffffffff81622641>] rollback_registered+0x31/0x40 [ 272.195369] [<ffffffff816229c8>] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x58/0x90 [ 272.208230] [<ffffffff81547ca0>] __tun_detach+0x140/0x340 [ 272.220686] [<ffffffff81547ed6>] tun_chr_close+0x36/0x60 Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
As Jiri noted, currently we first do all bonding-specific initialization (specifically - bond_select_active_slave(bond)) before we actually attach the slave (so that it becomes visible through bond_for_each_slave() and friends). This might result in bond_select_active_slave() not seeing the first/new slave and, thus, not actually selecting an active slave. Fix this by moving all the bond-related init part after we've actually completely initialized and linked (via bond_master_upper_dev_link()) the new slave. Also, remove the bond_(de/a)ttach_slave(), it's useless to have functions to ++/-- one int. After this we have all the initialization of the new slave *before* linking, and all the stuff that needs to be done on bonding *after* it. It has also a bonus effect - we can remove the locking on the new slave init completely, and only use it for bond_select_active_slave(). Reported-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Acked-by: Ding Tianhong@huawei.com Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
no longer needed since bond_option_active_slave_set() can be used instead. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Aleksandrov 提交于
This patch adds two new hash policy modes which use skb_flow_dissect: 3 - Encapsulated layer 2+3 4 - Encapsulated layer 3+4 There should be a good improvement for tunnel users in those modes. It also changes the old hash functions to: hash ^= (__force u32)flow.dst ^ (__force u32)flow.src; hash ^= (hash >> 16); hash ^= (hash >> 8); Where hash will be initialized either to L2 hash, that is SRCMAC[5] XOR DSTMAC[5], or to flow->ports which should be extracted from the upper layer. Flow's dst and src are also extracted based on the xmit policy either directly from the buffer or by using skb_flow_dissect, but in both cases if the protocol is IPv6 then dst and src are obtained by ipv6_addr_hash() on the real addresses. In case of a non-dissectable packet, the algorithms fall back to L2 hashing. The bond_set_mode_ops() function is now obsolete and thus deleted because it was used only to set the proper hash policy. Also we trim a pointer from struct bonding because we no longer need to keep the hash function, now there's only a single hash function - bond_xmit_hash that works based on bond->params.xmit_policy. The hash function and skb_flow_dissect were suggested by Eric Dumazet. The layer names were suggested by Andy Gospodarek, because I suck at semantics. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we rely on rtnl locking in bond_set_rx_mode(), however it's not always the case: RTNL: assertion failed at drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c (3391) ... [<ffffffff81651ca5>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74 [<ffffffffa029e717>] bond_set_rx_mode+0xc7/0xd0 [bonding] [<ffffffff81553af7>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [<ffffffff81557ff8>] __dev_mc_add+0x58/0x70 [<ffffffff81558020>] dev_mc_add+0x10/0x20 [<ffffffff8161e26e>] igmp6_group_added+0x18e/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81186f76>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x236/0x260 [<ffffffff8161f80f>] ipv6_dev_mc_inc+0x29f/0x320 [<ffffffff8161f9e7>] ipv6_sock_mc_join+0x157/0x260 ... Fix this by using RCU primitives. Reported-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> Tested-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
Recently grabbed this report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005567 Of an issue in which the bonding driver, with an attached vlan encountered the following errors when bond0 was taken down and back up: dummy1: promiscuity touches roof, set promiscuity failed. promiscuity feature of device might be broken. The error occurs because, during __bond_release_one, if we release our last slave, we take on a random mac address and issue a NETDEV_CHANGEADDR notification. With an attached vlan, the vlan may see that the vlan and bond mac address were in sync, but no longer are. This triggers a call to dev_uc_add and dev_set_rx_mode, which enables IFF_PROMISC on the bond device. Then, when we complete __bond_release_one, we use the current state of the bond flags to determine if we should decrement the promiscuity of the releasing slave. But since the bond changed promiscuity state during the release operation, we incorrectly decrement the slave promisc count when it wasn't in promiscuous mode to begin with, causing the above error Fix is pretty simple, just cache the bonding flags at the start of the function and use those when determining the need to set promiscuity. This is also needed for the ALLMULTI flag CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Mark Wu <wudxw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Reported-by: NMark Wu <wudxw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
After commit 1f718f0f ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the actual 'linking' in the end of the function - so that, once linked, the slave is ready to be used, and is not still in the process of enslaving. However, 802.3ad verified if it's the first slave by looking at the if (bond_first_slave(bond) == new_slave) which, because we've moved the linking to the end, became broken - on the first slave bond_first_slave(bond) returns NULL. Fix this by verifying if the prev_slave, that equals bond_last_slave(), is actually populated - if it is - then it's not the first slave, and vice versa. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 9月, 2013 11 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour. The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device bridge0. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
And all the initialization. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We don't really need it, and it's really hard to RCUify the list->prev. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we verify if we have slaves by checking if bond->slave_list is empty. Create a define bond_has_slaves() and use it, a bit more readable and easier to change in the future. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently it uses the hard-to-rcuify bond_for_each_slave_from(), and also it doesn't check every slave for disrepencies between the actual IS_UP(slave) and the slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP, but only till we find the next suitable slave. Fix this by using bond_for_each_slave() and storing the first good slave in *before till we find the current_arp_slave, after that we store the first good slave in new_slave. If new_slave is empty - use the slave stored in before, and if it's also empty - then we didn't find any suitable slave. Also, in the meanwhile, check for each slave status. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
bond_find_best_slave() does not have to be balanced - i.e. return the slave that is *after* some other slave, but rather return the best slave that suits, except of bond->primary_slave - in which case we just return it if it's suitable. After that we just look through all the slaves and return either first up slave or the slave whose link came back earliest. We also don't care about curr_active_slave lock cause we use it in bond_should_change_active() only and there we take it right away - i.e. it won't go away. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We're safe agains removal there, cause we use neighbours primitives. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It needs a list_head *iter, so add it wherever needed. Use both non-rcu and rcu variants. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We only use it in rollback scenarios and can easily use the standart bond_for_each_dev() instead. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Use the new provided function when attaching the lower slave to populate its ->private with struct slave *new_slave. Also, move it to the end to be able to 'find' it only after it was completely initialized, and deinitialize in the first place on release. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices. This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path. To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure - adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list), i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible, currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't change the main linked logic at all. Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following rules: netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_* If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to get better stack traces. CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
running bonding in ALB mode requires that learning packets be sent periodically, so that the switch knows where to send responding traffic. However, depending on switch configuration, there may not be any need to send traffic at the default rate of 3 packets per second, which represents little more than wasted data. Allow the ALB learning packet interval to be made configurable via sysfs Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: NAcked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We make bond_arp_rcv global so it can be used in bond_sysfs if the bond interface is up and arp_interval is being changed to a positive value and cleared otherwise as per Jay's suggestion. This also fixes a problem where bond_arp_rcv was set even though arp_validate was disabled while the bond was up by unsetting recv_probe in bond_store_arp_validate and respectively setting it if enabled. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 9月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
bond_compute_features is always called with RTNL held, so we can safely drop the read bond->lock. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We're protected by RTNL so nothing can happen and we can safely drop the read bond->lock. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We don't have to release all slaves when closing the bond dev, so remove the outdated comment and the braces around the left single statement. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
This patch aims to remove a use of the bond->lock for mutual exclusion which will later allow easier migration to RCU of the users of this functionality. We use RTNL as a synchronizing mechanism since it's always held when send_peer_notif is set, and when it is decremented from the notifier function. We can also drop some locking, and fix the leakage of the send_peer_notif counter. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
They're simply annoying and will spam dmesg constantly if we hit them, so convert to pr_debug so that we still can access them in case of debugging. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently there are no real users of vlan_list/current_alb_vlan, only the helpers which maintain them, so remove them. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We always hold the rtnl_lock() in __bond_release_one(), so use vlan_uses_dev() instead of bond_vlan_used(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, bond_has_this_ip() is aware only of vlan upper devices, and thus will return false if the address is associated with the upper bridge or any other device, and thus will break the arp logic. Fix this by using the upper device list. For every upper device we verify if the address associated with it is our address, and if yes - return true. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, bond_arp_send_all() is aware only of vlans, which breaks configurations like bond <- bridge (or any other 'upper' device) with IP (which is quite a common scenario for virt setups). To fix this we convert the bond_arp_send_all() to first verify if the rt device is the bond itself, and if not - to go through its list of upper vlans and their respectiv upper devices (if the vlan's upper device matches - tag the packet), if still not found - go through all of our upper list devices to see if any of them match the route device for the target. If the match is a vlan device - we also save its vlan_id and tag it in bond_arp_send(). Also, clean the function a bit to be more readable. CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-