The bond_first_slave_rcu() will be used to instead of bond_first_slave()
in rcu_read_lock().

According to the Jay Vosburgh's suggestion, the struct netdev_adjacent
should hide from users who wanted to use it directly. so I package a
new function to get the first slave of the bond.
Suggested-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() use the bond lock to protect the
bond slave list, it is no effect, so I could use RTNL or RCU to
replace it, considering the performance impact, the RCU is more
better here, so the bond lock replace with the RCU.

The bond_select_active_slave() need RTNL and curr_slave_lock
together, but there is no RTNL lock here, so add a rtnl_rtylock.
Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond_alb_monitor use bond lock to protect the bond slave list,
it is no effect here, we need to use RTNL or RCU to replace bond lock,
the bond_alb_monitor will called 10 times one second, RTNL may loss
performance here, so I replace bond lock with RCU to protect the
bond slave list, also the RTNL is preserved, the logic of the monitor
did not changed.
Suggested-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond_mii_monitor() still use bond lock to protect bond slave list,
it is no effect, I have 2 way to fix the problem, move the RTNL to the
top of the function, or add RCU to protect the bond slave list,
according to the Jay Vosburgh's opinion, 10 times one second is a
truely big performance loss if use RTNL to protect the whole monitor,
so I would take the advice and use RCU to protect the bond slave list.

The bond_has_slave() will not protect by anything, there will no things
happen if the slave list is be changed, unless the bond was free, but
it will not happened before the monitor, the bond will closed before
be freed.

The peers notify for the bond will calling curr_active_slave, so
derefence the slave to make sure we will accessing the same slave
if the curr_active_slave changed, as the rcu dereference need in
read-side critical sector and bond_change_active_slave() will call
it with no RCU hold,  so add peer notify in rcu_read_lock which
will be nested in monitor.
Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond slave list was no longer protected by bond lock and only
protected by RTNL or RCU, so anywhere that use bond lock to protect
slave list is meaningless.

remove the release and acquire bond lock for bond_select_active_slave().

The curr_active_slave could only be changed in 3 place:

1. enslave slave.
2. release slave.
3. change_active_slave.

all above place were holding bond lock, RTNL and curr_slave_lock
together, it is tedious and meaningless, obviously bond lock is no
need here, but RTNL or curr_slave_lock is needed, so if you want
to access active slave, you have to choose one lock, RTNL or
curr_slave_lock, if RTNL is exist, no need to add curr_slave_lock,
otherwise curr_slave_lock is better, because of the performance.

there are several place calling bond_select_active_slave() and
bond_change_active_slave(), the next step I will clean these place
and remove the no effect lock.

there are some document changed together when update the function.
Suggested-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_ARP_ALL_TARGETS to allow get/set of bonding parameter
arp_all_targets via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_ARP_VALIDATE to allow get/set of bonding parameter
arp_validate via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_ARP_IP_TARGET to allow get/set of bonding parameter
arp_ip_target via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_ARP_INTERVAL to allow get/set of bonding parameter
arp_interval via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_USE_CARRIER to allow get/set of bonding parameter
use_carrier via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_DOWNDELAY to allow get/set of bonding parameter
downdelay via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_UPDELAY to allow get/set of bonding parameter
updelay via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add IFLA_BOND_MIIMON to allow get/set of bonding parameter
miimon via netlink.
Signed-off-by: NScott Feldman <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Help of this function says: "in_dev: only on this interface, 0=any interface",
but since commit 39a6d063 ("[NETNS]: Process inet_confirm_addr in the
correct namespace."), the code supposes that it will never be NULL. This
function is never called with in_dev == NULL, but it's exported and may be used
by an external module.

Because this patch restore the ability to call inet_confirm_addr() with in_dev
== NULL, I partially revert the above commit, as suggested by Julian.

CC: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Reviewed-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

There's an issue when showing the value of packets_per_slave due to
using signed integer. The value may be < 0 and thus not put through
reciprocal_value() before showing. This patch makes it use unsigned
integer when showing it.

CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Several files refer to an old address for the Free Software Foundation
in the file header comment.  Resolve by replacing the address with
the URL <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/> so that we do not have to keep
updating the header comments anytime the address changes.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Acked-by: NWei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When I install the bonding with the wrong arp_ip_target,
just like arp_ip_target=500.500.500.500, the arp_ip_target
was transfored to 245.245.245.244 and stored in the ip
target success, it is uncorrect, so I add checks to avoid
adding wrong address.

The in4_pton() will set wrong ip address to 0.0.0.0 and
return 0, also use the micro IS_IP_TARGET_UNUSABLE_ADDRESS
to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Because the ARP monitoring is not support for 802.3ad, but I still
could change the mode to 802.3ad from ab mode while ARP monitoring
is running, it is incorrect.

So add a check for 802.3ad in bonding_store_mode to fix the problem,
and make a new macro BOND_NO_USES_ARP() to simplify the code.

v2: according to the Dan Williams's suggestion, bond mode is the most
    important bond option, it should override any of the other sub-options.
    So when the mode is changed, the conficting values should be cleared
    or reset, otherwise the user has to duplicate more operations to modify
    the logic. I disable the arp and enable mii monitoring when the bond mode
    is changed to AB, TB and 8023AD if the arp interval is true.

v3: according to the Nik's suggestion, the default value of miimon should need
    a name, there is several place to use it, and the bond_store_arp_interval()
    could use micro BOND_NO_USES_ARP to make the code more simpify.
Suggested-by: NDan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

I met a Bug when I add ip target with the wrong ip address:

echo +500.500.500.500 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/arp_ip_target

the wrong ip address will transfor to 245.245.245.244 and add
to the ip target success, it is uncorrect, so I add checks to avoid
adding wrong address.

The in4_pton() will set wrong ip address to 0.0.0.0, it will return by
the next check and will not add to ip target.

v2
According Veaceslav's opinion, simplify the code.

v3
According Veaceslav's opinion, add broadcast check and make a micro
definition to package it.

v4
Solve the problem of the format which David point out.
Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch fixes two race conditions between bond_store_updelay/downdelay
and bond_store_miimon which could lead to division by zero as miimon can
be set to 0 while either updelay/downdelay are being set and thus miss the
zero check in the beginning, the zero div happens because updelay/downdelay
are stored as new_value / bond->params.miimon. Use rtnl to synchronize with
miimon setting.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently the ARP monitoring is not supported with 802.3ad, and it's
prohibited to use it via the module params.

However we still can set it afterwards via sysfs, cause we only check for
*LB modes there.

To fix this - add a check for 802.3ad mode in bonding_store_arp_interval.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch aims to extend round-robin mode with a new option called
packets_per_slave which can have the following values and effects:
0 - choose a random slave
1 (default) - standard round-robin, 1 packet per slave
 >1 - round-robin when >1 packets have been transmitted per slave
The allowed values are between 0 and 65535.
This patch also fixes the comment style in bond_xmit_roundrobin().
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

There is an extra semi-colon so bond_get_size() doesn't return the
correct value.

Fixes: ec76aa49 ('bonding: add Netlink support active_slave option')
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This reverts commit 4d961a10, reversing
changes made to a00f6fcc.

Revert bond locking changes, they cause regressions and Veaceslav Falico
doesn't like how the commit messages were done at all.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and add the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

commit 991fb3f7 "dev: always advertise rx_flags changes via netlink"
introduced rtnl notification from __dev_set_promiscuity(),
which can be called in atomic context.

Steps to reproduce:
ip tuntap add dev tap1 mode tap
ifconfig tap1 up
tcpdump -nei tap1 &
ip tuntap del dev tap1 mode tap

[  271.627994] device tap1 left promiscuous mode
[  271.639897] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:940
[  271.664491] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3394, name: ip
[  271.677525] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  271.690503] CPU: 0 PID: 3394 Comm: ip Tainted: G        W    3.12.0-rc3+ #73
[  271.703996] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012
[  271.731254]  ffffffff81a58506 ffff8807f0d57a58 ffffffff817544e5 ffff88082fa0f428
[  271.760261]  ffff8808071f5f40 ffff8807f0d57a88 ffffffff8108bad1 ffffffff81110ff8
[  271.790683]  0000000000000010 00000000000000d0 00000000000000d0 ffff8807f0d57af8
[  271.822332] Call Trace:
[  271.838234]  [<ffffffff817544e5>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[  271.854446]  [<ffffffff8108bad1>] __might_sleep+0x181/0x240
[  271.870836]  [<ffffffff81110ff8>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x68/0xb0
[  271.887076]  [<ffffffff811a80be>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x4e/0x2a0
[  271.903368]  [<ffffffff810b4ddc>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1dc/0x5a0
[  271.919716]  [<ffffffff81614d67>] ? __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0
[  271.936088]  [<ffffffff810b4de0>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1e0/0x5a0
[  271.952504]  [<ffffffff81614d67>] __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0
[  271.968902]  [<ffffffff8163a0b2>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x52/0x100
[  271.985302]  [<ffffffff8162ac6d>] __dev_notify_flags+0xad/0xc0
[  272.001642]  [<ffffffff8162ad0c>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x8c/0x1c0
[  272.017917]  [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380
[  272.033961]  [<ffffffff8162b109>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x29/0x50
[  272.049855]  [<ffffffff8172e937>] packet_dev_mc+0x87/0xc0
[  272.065494]  [<ffffffff81732052>] packet_notifier+0x1b2/0x380
[  272.080915]  [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380
[  272.096009]  [<ffffffff81761c66>] notifier_call_chain+0x66/0x150
[  272.110803]  [<ffffffff8108503e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
[  272.125468]  [<ffffffff81085056>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[  272.139984]  [<ffffffff81620190>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x40/0x70
[  272.154523]  [<ffffffff816201d6>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x16/0x20
[  272.168552]  [<ffffffff816224c5>] rollback_registered_many+0x145/0x240
[  272.182263]  [<ffffffff81622641>] rollback_registered+0x31/0x40
[  272.195369]  [<ffffffff816229c8>] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x58/0x90
[  272.208230]  [<ffffffff81547ca0>] __tun_detach+0x140/0x340
[  272.220686]  [<ffffffff81547ed6>] tun_chr_close+0x36/0x60
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

As Jiri noted, currently we first do all bonding-specific initialization
(specifically - bond_select_active_slave(bond)) before we actually attach
the slave (so that it becomes visible through bond_for_each_slave() and
friends). This might result in bond_select_active_slave() not seeing the
first/new slave and, thus, not actually selecting an active slave.

Fix this by moving all the bond-related init part after we've actually
completely initialized and linked (via bond_master_upper_dev_link()) the
new slave.

Also, remove the bond_(de/a)ttach_slave(), it's useless to have functions
to ++/-- one int.

After this we have all the initialization of the new slave *before*
linking, and all the stuff that needs to be done on bonding *after* it. It
has also a bonus effect - we can remove the locking on the new slave init
completely, and only use it for bond_select_active_slave().
Reported-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ding Tianhong@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It can be called from the module init function, so it cannot
be in the exit section.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

no longer needed since bond_option_active_slave_set() can be used
instead.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Do a bit of refactoring on the way.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The bond_for_each_slave() will not be protected by read_lock(),
only protected by rtnl_lock(), so need to replace read_lock()
with rtnl_lock().
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>