GP10B requires a specific initialization sequence due to the absence of
devinit.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

GP10B's MC is compatible with GP100's, but engines need to be explicitly
put out of ELPG during init.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

GP10B's FB is largely compatible with the GP100 implementation.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

GP10B's secboot is largely similar to GM20B's. Only differences are MC
base address and the fact that GPCCS is also securely managed.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Change the secboot and msgqueue interfaces to take a mask of falcons to
reset instead of a single falcon. The GP10B firmware interface requires
FECS and GPCCS to be booted in a single firmware command.

For firmwares that only support single falcon boot, it is trivial to
loop over the mask and boot each falcons individually.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

This commit reworks the RAM detection algorithm, using RAM-per-LTC to
determine whether a board has a mixed-memory configuration instead of
using RAM-per-FBPA.  I'm not certain the algorithm is perfect, but it
should handle all currently known configurations in the very least.

This should fix GTX 970 boards with 4GiB of RAM where the last 512MiB
isn't fully accessible, as well as only detecting half the VRAM on
GF108 boards.

As a nice side-effect, GP10x memory detection now reuses the majority
of the code from earlier chipsets.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Apparently sinks are allows to respond with ACK even if they didn't
fully complete a transaction...  It seems like a missed opportunity
for DEFER to me, but what do I know :)
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

These gp10x chips are supporting using (roughly) the same firmware.
Compared to previous secure chips, ACR runs on SEC2 and so does the
low-secure msgqueue.

ACR for these chips is based on r367.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

On some secure boot instances (e.g. gp10x) the load and unload blobs do
not run on the same falcon. Support this case by introducing a new
member to the ACR structure and making related functions take the falcon
to use as an argument instead of assuming the boot falcon is to be used.

The rule is that the load blob can be run on either the SEC or PMU
falcons, but the unload blob must be always run on PMU.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Add support for running the ACR binary on the SEC falcon.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

NVIDIA-provided PMU firmware is controlled by a msgqueue. Add a member
to the PMU structure as well as the required cleanup code if this
feature is used.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Make nvkm_secboot_falcon_name publicly visible as other subdevs will
need to use it for debug messages.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

704a6c008b7942bb7f30bb43d2a6bcad7f543662 broke pci msi rearm for g92 GPUs.

g92 needs the nv46_pci_msi_rearm, where g94+ gpus used nv40_pci_msi_rearm.
Reported-by: NAndrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

v2: Set entry to 0xff if not found
    Add cap entry for ver 0x30 tables
    Rework to fix memory leak
v3: More error checks
    Simplify check for invalid entries
v4: disable for ver 0x10 for now
    move assignments after the second last return
Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

We never have any need for a double-linked list here, and as there's
generally a large number of these objects, replace it with a single-
linked list in order to save some memory.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Split the reset function into more meaningful and reusable ones.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Split the act of building the ACR blob from firmware files from the rest
of the (chip-dependent) secure boot logic. ACR logic is moved into
acr_rxxx.c files, where rxxx corresponds to the compatible release of
the NVIDIA driver. At the moment r352 and r361 are supported since
firmwares have been released for these versions. Some abstractions are
added on top of r352 so r361 can easily be implemented on top of it by
just overriding a few hooks.

This split makes it possible and easy to reuse the same ACR version on
different chips. It also hopefully makes the code much more readable as
the different secure boot logics are separated. As more chips and
firmware versions will be supported, this is a necessity to not get lost
in code that is already quite complex.

This is a big commit, but it essentially moves things around (and split
the nvkm_secboot structure into two, nvkm_secboot and nvkm_acr). Code
semantics should not be affected.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Since GR has moved to using the falcon library to start the falcons,
this function is not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Use the falcon library functions in secure boot. This removes a lot of
code and makes the secure boot flow easier to understand as no register
is directly accessed.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

These functions should use the nvkm_secboot_falcon enum. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Add a dummy PMU device so the PMU falcon is instanciated and can be used
by secure boot.

We could reuse gk20a's implementation here, but it would fight with
secboot over PMU falcon's ownership and secboot will reset the PMU,
preventing it from operating afterwards. Proper handout between secboot
and pmu is coming along with the actual gm20b PMU implementation, so
use this as a temporary solution.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Have an instance of nvkm_falcon in the PMU structure, ready to be used
by other subdevs (i.e. secboot).
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Add a function that allows us to query whether a given subdev is
currently enabled or not.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

GP102/GP104 require a harder reset of PMU prior to DEVINIT, or the IFR
image will hang.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Just enough to hookup preinit reset(), which DEVINIT will depend on later.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

gm20b's FB has the same capabilities as gm200, minus the ability to
allocate RAM. Create a device that reflects this instead of re-using the
gk20a device which may be incorrect.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-By: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>