- 06 4月, 2017 10 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Forked from GP106 implementation. Differences: - 1 PPC/GPC - Slightly different grctx magics Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's power is managed by generic PM domains, so it does not require a VDD regulator. Add this option into the chip function structure. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GR is similar to GP100, with a few unavailable registers. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B requires a specific initialization sequence due to the absence of devinit. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's MC is compatible with GP100's, but engines need to be explicitly put out of ELPG during init. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's FB is largely compatible with the GP100 implementation. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's FIFO is similar to GP100's, but only allows 512 channels. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's secboot is largely similar to GM20B's. Only differences are MC base address and the fact that GPCCS is also securely managed. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Having access to the secboot instance loading a LS firmware can be useful to LS firmware handlers. At least more useful than just having an out-of-context subdev pointer. GP10B's firmware will also need to know the WPR address, which can be obtained from the secboot instance. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Change the secboot and msgqueue interfaces to take a mask of falcons to reset instead of a single falcon. The GP10B firmware interface requires FECS and GPCCS to be booted in a single firmware command. For firmwares that only support single falcon boot, it is trivial to loop over the mask and boot each falcons individually. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 07 3月, 2017 16 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This commit reworks the RAM detection algorithm, using RAM-per-LTC to determine whether a board has a mixed-memory configuration instead of using RAM-per-FBPA. I'm not certain the algorithm is perfect, but it should handle all currently known configurations in the very least. This should fix GTX 970 boards with 4GiB of RAM where the last 512MiB isn't fully accessible, as well as only detecting half the VRAM on GF108 boards. As a nice side-effect, GP10x memory detection now reuses the majority of the code from earlier chipsets. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Apparently sinks are allows to respond with ACK even if they didn't fully complete a transaction... It seems like a missed opportunity for DEFER to me, but what do I know :) Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Differences from GP100: - 3 PPCs/GPC. - Another random reg to calculate/write. - Attrib CB setup a little different. - PascalB - PascalComputeB Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
These gp10x chips are supporting using (roughly) the same firmware. Compared to previous secure chips, ACR runs on SEC2 and so does the low-secure msgqueue. ACR for these chips is based on r367. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
On some secure boot instances (e.g. gp10x) the load and unload blobs do not run on the same falcon. Support this case by introducing a new member to the ACR structure and making related functions take the falcon to use as an argument instead of assuming the boot falcon is to be used. The rule is that the load blob can be run on either the SEC or PMU falcons, but the unload blob must be always run on PMU. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Support running a message queue firmware on SEC. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Add support for running the ACR binary on the SEC falcon. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
On SEC, DMEM is unaccessible by the CPU when the falcon is running in LS mode. This makes communication with the firmware using DMEM impossible. For this purpose, a new kind of memory (EMEM) has been added. It works similarly to DMEM, with the difference that its address space starts at 0x1000000. For this reason, it makes sense to treat it like a special case of DMEM. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
SEC2 is the name given by NVIDIA to the SEC engine post-Fermi (reasons unknown). Even though it shares the same address range as SEC, its usage is quite different and this justifies a new engine. Add this engine and make TOP use it all post-TOP devices should use this implementation and not the older SEC. Also quickly add the short gp102 implementation which will be used for falcon booting purposes. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
gp10x' secure boot requires a blob to be run on NVDEC. Expose the falcon through a dummy device. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Reading registers at device construction time can be harmful, as there is no guarantee the underlying engine will be up, or in its runtime configuration. Defer register reading to the oneinit() hook and update users accordingly. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
NVIDIA-provided PMU firmware is controlled by a msgqueue. Add a member to the PMU structure as well as the required cleanup code if this feature is used. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
A message queue firmware implements a specific protocol allowing the host to send "commands" to a falcon, and the falcon to reply using "messages". This patch implements the common part of this protocol and defines the interface that the host can use. Due to the way the firmware is developped internally at NVIDIA (where kernel driver and firmware evolve in lockstep), firmwares taken at different points in time can have frustratingly subtle differences that must be taken into account. This code is architectured to make implementing such differences as easy as possible. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
The falcon library may be used concurrently, especially after the introduction of the msgqueue interface. Make it safe to use it that way. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Make nvkm_secboot_falcon_name publicly visible as other subdevs will need to use it for debug messages. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2017 14 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
704a6c008b7942bb7f30bb43d2a6bcad7f543662 broke pci msi rearm for g92 GPUs. g92 needs the nv46_pci_msi_rearm, where g94+ gpus used nv40_pci_msi_rearm. Reported-by: NAndrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
v2: Set entry to 0xff if not found Add cap entry for ver 0x30 tables Rework to fix memory leak v3: More error checks Simplify check for invalid entries v4: disable for ver 0x10 for now move assignments after the second last return Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
FIFO gives us load/save/switch status, and we need to be able to determine which direction a "switch" is failing during channel recovery. In order to do this, we apparently need to query the engine itself. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
There are instances (such as non-recoverable GPU page faults) where NVKM decides that a channel's context is no longer viable, and will be removed from the runlist. This commit notifies the owner of the channel when this happens, so it has the opportunity to take some kind of recovery action instead of hanging. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
We never have any need for a double-linked list here, and as there's generally a large number of these objects, replace it with a single- linked list in order to save some memory. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
We want a supervisor client of NVKM (such as the DRM) to be able to allow sharing of resources (such as memory objects) between clients. To allow this, the supervisor creates all its clients as children of itself, and will use an upcoming ioctl to permit sharing. Currently it's not possible for indirect clients to use subclients. Supporting this will require an additional field in the main ioctl. This isn't important currently, but will need to be fixed for virt. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Preparation for supporting subclients. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-