1. 09 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 04 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 08 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 05 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 18 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 20 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 10 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 28 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 23 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 22 12月, 2010 9 次提交
  12. 09 10月, 2010 2 次提交
    • P
      OMAP: control: move plat-omap/control.h to mach-omap2/control.h · 4814ced5
      Paul Walmsley 提交于
      Only OMAP2+ platforms have the System Control Module (SCM) IP block.
      In the past, we've kept the SCM header file in plat-omap.  This has
      led to abuse - device drivers including it; includes being added that
      create implicit dependencies on OMAP2+ builds; etc.
      
      In response, move the SCM headers into mach-omap2/.
      
      As part of this, remove the direct SCM access from the OMAP UDC
      driver.  It was clearly broken.  The UDC code needs an indepth review for
      use on OMAP2+ chips.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Cc: Cory Maccarrone <darkstar6262@gmail.com>
      Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
      4814ced5
    • M
      OMAP: mach-omap2: Fix static declaration warnings · 38815733
      Manjunath Kondaiah G 提交于
      This patch fixes sparse warnings due to non declaration of
      static structures and variables.
      
      Sparse warning logs fixed:
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_secure_ram_storage' was not declared. Should it be static?
      n
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:50:22: warning: symbol 'gptimer_wakeup' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:240:18: warning: symbol 'omap_timer' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c:121:24: warning: symbol 'prcm_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2420.c:510:29: warning: symbol 'omap2420_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2430.c:589:29: warning: symbol 'omap2430_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:934:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1080:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1272:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1393:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1603:28: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1821:29: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c:165:15: warning: symbol 'pm_dbg_dir' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:587:30: warning: symbol 'ads7846_config' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:606:23: warning: symbol 'omap3evm_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:46:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_sdrc_params' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:211:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_get_sdram_timings' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c:64:15: warning: symbol 'touchbook_revision' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517evm.c:350:24: warning: symbol 'am3517_evm_dss_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c:567:23: warning: symbol 'omap3stalker_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NManjunath Kondaiah G <manjugk@ti.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      38815733
  13. 22 9月, 2010 2 次提交
  14. 21 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 31 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  16. 12 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • A
      omap: pass the reboot command to the boot loader · 29b9a218
      Aaro Koskinen 提交于
      This patch follows the commit be093beb
      by Russell King:
      
        OMAP wishes to pass state to the boot loader upon reboot in order
        to instruct it whether to wait for USB-based reflashing or not.
        There is already a facility to do this via the reboot() syscall,
        except we ignore the string passed to machine_restart().
      
      The patch adds the missing parameter to omap1_arch_reset() and
      omap_prcm_arch_reset(), and modifies the latter to pass the reboot
      command parameter to the boot loader instead of reboot mode (which is
      for kernel internal use only and cannot be modified by the userspace).
      Signed-off-by: NAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@nokia.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      29b9a218
  17. 25 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  18. 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  19. 30 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 27 1月, 2010 3 次提交
  21. 21 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  22. 12 12月, 2009 3 次提交
  23. 12 11月, 2009 3 次提交