- 02 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 28 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 27 2月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 26 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 20 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 17 2月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 09 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Rieken 提交于
-
- 28 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 21 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 18 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Ross 提交于
and add command to task building progress Fixes #81636
-
- 08 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 27 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 13 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rob Lourens 提交于
-
- 30 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Rieken 提交于
-
- 27 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 SteVen Batten 提交于
fixes #71407
-
- 23 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 SteVen Batten 提交于
-
- 06 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 28 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 17 6月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 12 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
-
- 08 6月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
Also changes processService to not modify its input actions, which seems like unexpected behavior
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
These arrays of actions should not be modified by the caller. Mark them as readonly to prevent this. This also let me eliminate a number of not null supressions that had been introduced during the strict null migration One small code change was required in `showError`. However I believe this was actually a bug since modifying the input array was likely not what would be expected (in practice, we usually just passed in array literals so I don't think we hit this one)
-
- 06 6月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 28 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Rieken 提交于
-
- 24 5月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 23 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Pasero 提交于
-
- 09 1月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
This state is currently unused and make no sense. Update the signature to prevent ever trying to go into this state
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
**Problem** In progress service, the `ProgressState` object is quite difficult to understand. Only a subset of fields are active at a given time so the state is really more like a state machine. When enabling strict null checks, the existing pattern is also a pain because it is not clear which subset of fields go to gether and will not be undefined **Fix** I've been experimenting with writing states much explicitly. This has two main points: - Encapsulating all state in a single state object (which the progress service already does) - Encoding each valid state very explicitly in a state machine like manner For progress service, the encoding breaks the `ProgressState` object up into five different states that the progress service transitions between.
-
- 08 1月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
These values are really supposed to be undefined
-
由 Matt Bierner 提交于
-
- 04 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rob Lourens 提交于
-
- 13 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Rieken 提交于
-
- 07 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Rieken 提交于
-