Skip to content

L
linux

xiphi1978 / linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 28 6月, 2008 2 次提交
    • N
      Don't acknowlege that stripe-expand is complete until it really is. · efe31143
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      We shouldn't acknowledge that a stripe has been expanded (When
reshaping a raid5 by adding a device) until the moved data has
actually been written out.  However we are currently
acknowledging (by calling md_done_sync) when the POST_XOR
is complete and before the write.

So track in s.locked whether there are pending writes, and don't
call md_done_sync yet if there are.

Note: we all set R5_LOCKED on devices which are are about to
read from.  This probably isn't technically necessary, but is
usually done when writing a block, and justifies the use of
s.locked here.

This bug can lead to a crash if an array is stopped while an reshape
is in progress.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      efe31143
    • N
      Ensure interrupted recovery completed properly (v1 metadata plus bitmap) · 8c2e870a
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      If, while assembling an array, we find a device which is not fully
in-sync with the array, it is important to set the "fullsync" flags.
This is an exact analog to the setting of this flag in hot_add_disk
methods.

Currently, only v1.x metadata supports having devices in an array
which are not fully in-sync (it keep track of how in sync they are).
The 'fullsync' flag only makes a difference when a write-intent bitmap
is being used.  In this case it tells recovery to ignore the bitmap
and recovery all blocks.

This fix is already in place for raid1, but not raid5/6 or raid10.

So without this fix, a raid1 ir raid4/5/6 array with version 1.x
metadata and a write intent bitmaps, that is stopped in the middle
of a recovery, will appear to complete the recovery instantly
after it is reassembled, but the recovery will not be correct.

If you might have an array like that, issueing
   echo repair > /sys/block/mdXX/md/sync_action

will make sure recovery completes properly.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      8c2e870a
  3. 07 6月, 2008 2 次提交
    • D
      md: do not compute parity unless it is on a failed drive · c337869d
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      If a block is computed (rather than read) then a check/repair operation
may be lead to believe that the data on disk is correct, when infact it
isn't.  So only compute blocks for failed devices.

This issue has been around since at least 2.6.12, but has become harder to
hit in recent kernels since most reads bypass the cache.

echo repair > /sys/block/mdN/md/sync_action will set the parity blocks to the
correct state.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c337869d
    • D
      md: fix prexor vs sync_request race · e0a115e5
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      During the initial array synchronization process there is a window between
when a prexor operation is scheduled to a specific stripe and when it
completes for a sync_request to be scheduled to the same stripe.  When
this happens the prexor completes and the stripe is unconditionally marked
"insync", effectively canceling the sync_request for the stripe.  Prior to
2.6.23 this was not a problem because the prexor operation was done under
sh->lock.  The effect in older kernels being that the prexor would still
erroneously mark the stripe "insync", but sync_request would be held off
and re-mark the stripe as "!in_sync".

Change the write completion logic to not mark the stripe "in_sync" if a
prexor was performed.  The effect of the change is to sometimes not set
STRIPE_INSYNC.  The worst this can do is cause the resync to stall waiting
for STRIPE_INSYNC to be set.  If this were happening, then STRIPE_SYNCING
would be set and handle_issuing_new_read_requests would cause all
available blocks to eventually be read, at which point prexor would never
be used on that stripe any more and STRIPE_INSYNC would eventually be set.

echo repair > /sys/block/mdN/md/sync_action will correct arrays that may
have lost this race.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e0a115e5
  5. 25 5月, 2008 2 次提交
    • N
      md: restart recovery cleanly after device failure. · dfc70645
      由 NeilBrown 提交于 
      When we get any IO error during a recovery (rebuilding a spare), we abort
the recovery and restart it.

For RAID6 (and multi-drive RAID1) it may not be best to restart at the
beginning: when multiple failures can be tolerated, the recovery may be
able to continue and re-doing all that has already been done doesn't make
sense.

We already have the infrastructure to record where a recovery is up to
and restart from there, but it is not being used properly.
This is because:
  - We sometimes abort with MD_RECOVERY_ERR rather than just MD_RECOVERY_INTR,
    which causes the recovery not be be checkpointed.
  - We remove spares and then re-added them which loses important state
    information.

The distinction between MD_RECOVERY_ERR and MD_RECOVERY_INTR really isn't
needed.  If there is an error, the relevant drive will be marked as
Faulty, and that is enough to ensure correct handling of the error.  So we
first remove MD_RECOVERY_ERR, changing some of the uses of it to
MD_RECOVERY_INTR.

Then we cause the attempt to remove a non-faulty device from an array to
fail (unless recovery is impossible as the array is too degraded).  Then
when remove_and_add_spares attempts to remove the devices on which
recovery can continue, it will fail, they will remain in place, and
recovery will continue on them as desired.

Issue:  If we are halfway through rebuilding a spare and another drive
fails, and a new spare is immediately available,  do we want to:
 1/ complete the current rebuild, then go back and rebuild the new spare or
 2/ restart the rebuild from the start and rebuild both devices in
    parallel.

Both options can be argued for.  The code currently takes option 2 as
  a/ this requires least code change
  b/ this results in a minimally-degraded array in minimal time.

Cc: "Eivind Sarto" <ivan@kasenna.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      dfc70645
    • B
      md: md: raid5 rate limit error printk · 6be9d494
      由 Bernd Schubert 提交于 
      Last night we had scsi problems and a hardware raid unit was offlined
during heavy i/o.  While this happened we got for about 3 minutes a huge
number messages like these

Apr 12 03:36:07 pfs1n14 kernel: [197510.696595] raid5:md7: read error not correctable (sector 2993096568 on sdj2).

I guess the high error rate is responsible for not scheduling other events
- during this time the system was not pingable and in the end also other
devices run into scsi command timeouts causing problems on these unrelated
devices as well.
Signed-off-by: NBernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6be9d494
  7. 15 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • N
      Remove blkdev warning triggered by using md · e7e72bf6
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      As setting and clearing queue flags now requires that we hold a spinlock
on the queue, and as blk_queue_stack_limits is called without that lock,
get the lock inside blk_queue_stack_limits.

For blk_queue_stack_limits to be able to find the right lock, each md
personality needs to set q->queue_lock to point to the appropriate lock.
Those personalities which didn't previously use a spin_lock, us
q->__queue_lock.  So always initialise that lock when allocated.

With this in place, setting/clearing of the QUEUE_FLAG_PLUGGED bit will no
longer cause warnings as it will be clear that the proper lock is held.

Thanks to Dan Williams for review and fixing the silly bugs.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e7e72bf6
  9. 13 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 30 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 28 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  15. 11 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 20 3月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      drivers/md/raid5.c: fix printk warnings · 9ea85eba
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      gcc-3.4.5 on sparc64:

drivers/md/raid5.c: In function `raid5_end_read_request':
drivers/md/raid5.c:1147: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 4)
drivers/md/raid5.c:1164: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 3)
drivers/md/raid5.c:1170: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 3)

sector_t is u64, and we don't know what type the architecture uses to
implement u64 (on some it is unsigned long).

Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9ea85eba
  19. 07 2月, 2008 4 次提交
  21. 09 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 15 11月, 2007 1 次提交
    • D
      raid5: fix unending write sequence · 6c55be8b
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      <debug output from Joel's system>
handling stripe 7629696, state=0x14 cnt=1, pd_idx=2 ops=0:0:0
check 5: state 0x6 toread 0000000000000000 read 0000000000000000 write fffff800ffcffcc0 written 0000000000000000
check 4: state 0x6 toread 0000000000000000 read 0000000000000000 write fffff800fdd4e360 written 0000000000000000
check 3: state 0x1 toread 0000000000000000 read 0000000000000000 write 0000000000000000 written 0000000000000000
check 2: state 0x1 toread 0000000000000000 read 0000000000000000 write 0000000000000000 written 0000000000000000
check 1: state 0x6 toread 0000000000000000 read 0000000000000000 write fffff800ff517e40 written 0000000000000000
check 0: state 0x6 toread 0000000000000000 read 0000000000000000 write fffff800fd4cae60 written 0000000000000000
locked=4 uptodate=2 to_read=0 to_write=4 failed=0 failed_num=0
for sector 7629696, rmw=0 rcw=0
</debug>

These blocks were prepared to be written out, but were never handled in
ops_run_biodrain(), so they remain locked forever.  The operations flags
are all clear which means handle_stripe() thinks nothing else needs to be
done.

This state suggests that the STRIPE_OP_PREXOR bit was sampled 'set' when it
should not have been.  This patch cleans up cases where the code looks at
sh->ops.pending when it should be looking at the consistent stack-based
snapshot of the operations flags.

Report from Joel:
	Resync done. Patch fix this bug.
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested-by: NJoel Bertrand <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6c55be8b
  25. 09 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  27. 06 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  29. 23 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  31. 16 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  33. 10 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  35. 25 9月, 2007 1 次提交
    • D
      raid5: fix 2 bugs in ops_complete_biofill · e4d84909
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      1/ ops_complete_biofill tried to avoid calling handle_stripe since all the
state necessary to return read completions is available.  However the
process of determining whether more read requests are pending requires
locking the stripe (to block add_stripe_bio from updating dev->toead).
ops_complete_biofill can run in tasklet context, so rather than upgrading
all the stripe locks from spin_lock to spin_lock_bh this patch just
unconditionally reschedules handle_stripe after completing the read
request.

2/ ops_complete_biofill needlessly qualified processing R5_Wantfill with
dev->toread.  The result being that the 'biofill' pending bit is cleared
before handling the pending read-completions on dev->read.  R5_Wantfill can
be unconditionally handled because the 'biofill' pending bit prevents new
R5_Wantfill requests from being seen by ops_run_biofill and
ops_complete_biofill.
Found-by: NYuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
[neilb@suse.de: simpler fix for bug 1 than moving code]
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      e4d84909
  37. 12 9月, 2007 1 次提交
  39. 24 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  41. 20 7月, 2007 2 次提交
  43. 13 7月, 2007 9 次提交
    • D
      md: remove raid5 compute_block and compute_parity5 · f6dff381
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      replaced by raid5_run_ops
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      f6dff381
    • D
      md: handle_stripe5 - request io processing in raid5_run_ops · 830ea016
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      I/O submission requests were already handled outside of the stripe lock in
handle_stripe.  Now that handle_stripe is only tasked with finding work,
this logic belongs in raid5_run_ops.
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      830ea016
    • D
      md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async expand ops · f0a50d37
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      When a stripe is being expanded bulk copying takes place to move the data
from the old stripe to the new.  Since raid5_run_ops only operates on one
stripe at a time these bulk copies are handled in-line under the stripe
lock.  In the dma offload case we poll for the completion of the operation.

After the data has been copied into the new stripe the parity needs to be
recalculated across the new disks.  We reuse the existing postxor
functionality to carry out this calculation.  By setting STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR
without setting STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN the completion path in handle stripe
can differentiate expand operations from normal write operations.
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      f0a50d37
    • D
      md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async read ops · b5e98d65
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      When a read bio is attached to the stripe and the corresponding block is
marked R5_UPTODATE, then a read (biofill) operation is scheduled to copy
the data from the stripe cache to the bio buffer.  handle_stripe flags the
blocks to be operated on with the R5_Wantfill flag.  If new read requests
arrive while raid5_run_ops is running they will not be handled until
handle_stripe is scheduled to run again.

Changelog:
* cleanup to_read and to_fill accounting
* do not fail reads that have reached the cache
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      b5e98d65
    • D
      md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async check ops · e89f8962
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      Check operations are scheduled when the array is being resynced or an
explicit 'check/repair' command was sent to the array.  Previously check
operations would destroy the parity block in the cache such that even if
parity turned out to be correct the parity block would be marked
!R5_UPTODATE at the completion of the check.  When the operation can be
carried out by a dma engine the assumption is that it can check parity as a
read-only operation.  If raid5_run_ops notices that the check was handled
by hardware it will preserve the R5_UPTODATE status of the parity disk.

When a check operation determines that the parity needs to be repaired we
reuse the existing compute block infrastructure to carry out the operation.
Repair operations imply an immediate write back of the data, so to
differentiate a repair from a normal compute operation the
STRIPE_OP_MOD_REPAIR_PD flag is added.

Changelog:
* remove test_and_set/test_and_clear BUG_ONs, Neil Brown
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      e89f8962
    • D
      md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async compute ops · f38e1219
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      handle_stripe will compute a block when a backing disk has failed, or when
it determines it can save a disk read by computing the block from all the
other up-to-date blocks.

Previously a block would be computed under the lock and subsequent logic in
handle_stripe could use the newly up-to-date block.  With the raid5_run_ops
implementation the compute operation is carried out a later time outside
the lock.  To preserve the old functionality we take advantage of the
dependency chain feature of async_tx to flag the block as R5_Wantcompute
and then let other parts of handle_stripe operate on the block as if it
were up-to-date.  raid5_run_ops guarantees that the block will be ready
before it is used in another operation.

However, this only works in cases where the compute and the dependent
operation are scheduled at the same time.  If a previous call to
handle_stripe sets the R5_Wantcompute flag there is no facility to pass the
async_tx dependency chain across successive calls to raid5_run_ops.  The
req_compute variable protects against this case.

Changelog:
* remove the req_compute BUG_ON
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      f38e1219
    • D
      md: handle_stripe5 - add request/completion logic for async write ops · e33129d8
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      After handle_stripe5 decides whether it wants to perform a
read-modify-write, or a reconstruct write it calls
handle_write_operations5.  A read-modify-write operation will perform an
xor subtraction of the blocks marked with the R5_Wantprexor flag, copy the
new data into the stripe (biodrain) and perform a postxor operation across
all up-to-date blocks to generate the new parity.  A reconstruct write is run
when all blocks are already up-to-date in the cache so all that is needed
is a biodrain and postxor.

On the completion path STRIPE_OP_PREXOR will be set if the operation was a
read-modify-write.  The STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN flag is used in the completion
path to differentiate write-initiated postxor operations versus
expansion-initiated postxor operations.  Completion of a write triggers i/o
to the drives.

Changelog:
* make the 'rcw' parameter to handle_write_operations5 a simple flag, Neil Brown
* remove test_and_set/test_and_clear BUG_ONs, Neil Brown
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      e33129d8
    • D
      md: common infrastructure for running operations with raid5_run_ops · d84e0f10
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      All the handle_stripe operations that are to be transitioned to use
raid5_run_ops need a method to coherently gather work under the stripe-lock
and hand that work off to raid5_run_ops.  The 'get_stripe_work' routine
runs under the lock to read all the bits in sh->ops.pending that do not
have the corresponding bit set in sh->ops.ack.  This modified 'pending'
bitmap is then passed to raid5_run_ops for processing.

The transition from 'ack' to 'completion' does not need similar protection
as the existing release_stripe infrastructure will guarantee that
handle_stripe will run again after a completion bit is set, and
handle_stripe can tolerate a sh->ops.completed bit being set while the lock
is held.

A call to async_tx_issue_pending_all() is added to raid5d to kick the
offload engines once all pending stripe operations work has been submitted.
This enables batching of the submission and completion of operations.
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      d84e0f10
    • D
      md: raid5_run_ops - run stripe operations outside sh->lock · 91c00924
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      When the raid acceleration work was proposed, Neil laid out the following
attack plan:

1/ move the xor and copy operations outside spin_lock(&sh->lock)
2/ find/implement an asynchronous offload api

The raid5_run_ops routine uses the asynchronous offload api (async_tx) and
the stripe_operations member of a stripe_head to carry out xor+copy
operations asynchronously, outside the lock.

To perform operations outside the lock a new set of state flags is needed
to track new requests, in-flight requests, and completed requests.  In this
new model handle_stripe is tasked with scanning the stripe_head for work,
updating the stripe_operations structure, and finally dropping the lock and
calling raid5_run_ops for processing.  The following flags outline the
requests that handle_stripe can make of raid5_run_ops:

STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL
 - copy data into request buffers to satisfy a read request
STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK
 - generate a missing block in the cache from the other blocks
STRIPE_OP_PREXOR
 - subtract existing data as part of the read-modify-write process
STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN
 - copy data out of request buffers to satisfy a write request
STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR
 - recalculate parity for new data that has entered the cache
STRIPE_OP_CHECK
 - verify that the parity is correct
STRIPE_OP_IO
 - submit i/o to the member disks (note this was already performed outside
   the stripe lock, but it made sense to add it as an operation type

The flow is:
1/ handle_stripe sets STRIPE_OP_* in sh->ops.pending
2/ raid5_run_ops reads sh->ops.pending, sets sh->ops.ack, and submits the
   operation to the async_tx api
3/ async_tx triggers the completion callback routine to set
   sh->ops.complete and release the stripe
4/ handle_stripe runs again to finish the operation and optionally submit
   new operations that were previously blocked

Note this patch just defines raid5_run_ops, subsequent commits (one per
major operation type) modify handle_stripe to take advantage of this
routine.

Changelog:
* removed ops_complete_biodrain in favor of ops_complete_postxor and
  ops_complete_write.
* removed the raid5_run_ops workqueue
* call bi_end_io for reads in ops_complete_biofill, saves a call to
  handle_stripe
* explicitly handle the 2-disk raid5 case (xor becomes memcpy), Neil Brown
* fix race between async engines and bi_end_io call for reads, Neil Brown
* remove unnecessary spin_lock from ops_complete_biofill
* remove test_and_set/test_and_clear BUG_ONs, Neil Brown
* remove explicit interrupt handling for channel switching, this feature
  was absorbed (i.e. it is now implicit) by the async_tx api
* use return_io in ops_complete_biofill
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-By: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      91c00924