提交 efe31143 编写于 作者: N Neil Brown

Don't acknowlege that stripe-expand is complete until it really is.

We shouldn't acknowledge that a stripe has been expanded (When
reshaping a raid5 by adding a device) until the moved data has
actually been written out.  However we are currently
acknowledging (by calling md_done_sync) when the POST_XOR
is complete and before the write.

So track in s.locked whether there are pending writes, and don't
call md_done_sync yet if there are.

Note: we all set R5_LOCKED on devices which are are about to
read from.  This probably isn't technically necessary, but is
usually done when writing a block, and justifies the use of
s.locked here.

This bug can lead to a crash if an array is stopped while an reshape
is in progress.

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
上级 8c2e870a
......@@ -2898,6 +2898,8 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
for (i = conf->raid_disks; i--; ) {
set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
s.locked++;
if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
sh->ops.count++;
}
......@@ -2911,6 +2913,7 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
conf->raid_disks);
s.locked += handle_write_operations5(sh, 1, 1);
} else if (s.expanded &&
s.locked == 0 &&
!test_bit(STRIPE_OP_POSTXOR, &sh->ops.pending)) {
clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state);
atomic_dec(&conf->reshape_stripes);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册