1. 31 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      ath10k: avoid possible deadlock with scan timeout · 4eb2e164
      Michal Kazior 提交于
      This should prevent deadlock predicted by the
      following splat:
      
       ======================================================
       [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
       3.17.0-wl-ath+ #67 Not tainted
       -------------------------------------------------------
       kworker/u32:1/7230 is trying to acquire lock:
        (&ar->conf_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa040a57d>] ath10k_scan_timeout_work+0x2d/0x50 [ath10k_core]
      
       but task is already holding lock:
        ((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8106dae1>] process_one_work+0x151/0x470
      
       which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
       the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
       -> #1 ((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work)){+.+...}:
              [<ffffffff810a12e5>] lock_acquire+0x85/0x100
              [<ffffffff8106cb4d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x270
              [<ffffffff8106e49d>] __cancel_work_timer+0x7d/0x110
              [<ffffffff8106e543>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
              [<ffffffffa0409f16>] ath10k_cancel_remain_on_channel+0x36/0x60 [ath10k_core]
              [<ffffffffa028c75c>] ieee80211_cancel_roc+0x1cc/0x2f0 [mac80211]
              [<ffffffffa028c8a2>] ieee80211_mgmt_tx_cancel_wait+0x22/0x30 [mac80211]
              [<ffffffffa0132288>] nl80211_tx_mgmt_cancel_wait+0xa8/0x130 [cfg80211]
              [<ffffffff816654a5>] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x1a5/0x3c0
              [<ffffffff81665749>] genl_rcv_msg+0x89/0xc0
              [<ffffffff81664e91>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xb1/0xc0
              [<ffffffff816650bc>] genl_rcv+0x2c/0x40
              [<ffffffff8166474d>] netlink_unicast+0x18d/0x200
              [<ffffffff81664add>] netlink_sendmsg+0x31d/0x430
              [<ffffffff8161a9ac>] sock_sendmsg+0x9c/0xd0
              [<ffffffff8161b469>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x389/0x3a0
              [<ffffffff8161bed9>] __sys_sendmsg+0x49/0x90
              [<ffffffff8161bf32>] SyS_sendmsg+0x12/0x20
              [<ffffffff8174c456>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
      
       -> #0 (&ar->conf_mutex){+.+.+.}:
              [<ffffffff810a0bde>] __lock_acquire+0x1b6e/0x1ce0
              [<ffffffff810a12e5>] lock_acquire+0x85/0x100
              [<ffffffff817491eb>] mutex_lock_nested+0x4b/0x370
              [<ffffffffa040a57d>] ath10k_scan_timeout_work+0x2d/0x50 [ath10k_core]
              [<ffffffff8106db41>] process_one_work+0x1b1/0x470
              [<ffffffff8106df63>] worker_thread+0x123/0x460
              [<ffffffff81073f34>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
              [<ffffffff8174c3ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      
       other info that might help us debug this:
      
        Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
              CPU0                    CPU1
              ----                    ----
         lock((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work));
                                      lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
                                      lock((&(&ar->scan.timeout)->work));
         lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
      
        *** DEADLOCK ***
      Reported-by: NMarek Puzyniak <marek.puzyniak@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMichal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      4eb2e164
  2. 24 10月, 2014 13 次提交
  3. 23 10月, 2014 3 次提交
  4. 21 10月, 2014 8 次提交
  5. 13 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 08 10月, 2014 5 次提交
  7. 07 10月, 2014 4 次提交
  8. 01 10月, 2014 3 次提交
  9. 29 9月, 2014 2 次提交