- 18 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
- 25 7月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Carlos Antonio da Silva 提交于
-
由 Rajarshi Das 提交于
change def self.primary_key to self.primary_key change def self.primary_key to self.primary_key
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
- 09 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
Closes #11248.
-
- 03 7月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 30 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
Method `delete_all` should not be invoking callbacks and this feature was deprecated in Rails 4.0. This is being removed. `delete_all` will continue to honor the `:dependent` option. However if `:dependent` value is `:destroy` then the default deletion strategy for that collection will be applied. User can also force a deletion strategy by passing parameter to `delete_all`. For example you can do `@post.comments.delete_all(:nullify)`
-
- 14 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
For example, you need to change this: class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :posts has_many :taggings, :through => :posts end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :tagging has_many :taggings end class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base end To this: class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :posts has_many :taggings, :through => :posts, :source => :tagging end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :tagging has_many :taggings end class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base end
-
- 09 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 wangjohn 提交于
of using +inverse_of: false+ option. Changing the documentation and adding a CHANGELOG entry for the automatic inverse detection feature.
-
- 23 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yves Senn 提交于
When removing records from a `has_many` association it used the `primary_key` defined on the association. Our test suite didn't fail because on all occurences of `:primary_key`, the specified column was available in both tables. This prevented the code from raising an exception but it still behaved badly. I added a test-case to prevent regressions that failed with: ``` 1) Error: HasManyAssociationsTest#test_has_many_assignment_with_custom_primary_key: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: SQLite3::SQLException: no such column: essays.first_name: UPDATE "essays" SET "writer_id" = NULL WHERE "essays"."writer_id" = ? AND "essays"."first_name" IS NULL ```
-
- 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Takehiro Adachi 提交于
According to https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b601399b72ab56cc01368f02615af99f45d1 4f02/activerecord/lib/active_record/counter_cache.rb#L14, u can pass more then one association to the `reset_counters` method.
-
- 08 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 wangjohn 提交于
the results. Added tests to check to make sure that inverse associations are automatically found when has_many, has_one, or belongs_to associations are defined.
-
- 02 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Godfrey Chan 提交于
When using symbol keys, ActiveRecord will now translate aliased attribute names to the actual column name used in the database: With the model class Topic alias_attribute :heading, :title end The call Topic.where(heading: 'The First Topic') should yield the same result as Topic.where(title: 'The First Topic') This also applies to ActiveRecord::Relation::Calculations calls such as `Model.sum(:aliased)` and `Model.pluck(:aliased)`. This will not work with SQL fragment strings like `Model.sum('DISTINCT aliased')`. Github #7839 *Godfrey Chan*
-
- 05 4月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
See #9869 and #9929. The problem arises from the following example: class Project < ActiveRecord::Base scope :completed, -> { where completed: true } end class MajorProject < Project end When calling: MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).completed This expands to: MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).scoping { MajorProject.completed } However the lambda for the `completed` scope is defined on Project. This means that when it is called, `self` is Project rather than MajorProject. So it expands to: MajorProject.where(tasks_count: 10).scoping { Project.where(completed: true) } Since the scoping was applied on MajorProject, and not Project, this fails to apply the tasks_count condition. The solution is to make scoping apply across STI classes. I am slightly concerned about the possible side-effects of this, but no tests fail and it seems ok. I guess we'll see.
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
fixes #10016
-
- 04 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Carlos Antonio da Silva 提交于
-
- 21 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ian Young 提交于
-
- 17 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mack Earnhardt 提交于
PR #5210 added a Friendship model to illustrate a bug, but in doing so created a confusing structure because both belongs_to declarations in Friendship referred to the same side of the join. The new structure maintains the integrity of the bug test while changing the follower relationship to be more useful for other testing.
-
- 15 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yves Senn 提交于
The similarity of `Relation#uniq` to `Array#uniq` is confusing. Since our Relation API is close to SQL terms I renamed `#uniq` to `#distinct`. There is no deprecation. `#uniq` and `#uniq!` are aliases and will continue to work. I also updated the documentation to promote the use of `#distinct`.
-
- 08 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yves Senn 提交于
Closes #9110
-
- 06 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Vorotilin 提交于
It cannot find subclass because all classes are loaded automatically when it needs.
-
- 24 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yves Senn 提交于
closes #9201
-
- 11 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sergey Nartimov 提交于
Allow store accessors to be overrided like other attribute methods, e.g.: class User < ActiveRecord::Base store :settings, accessors: [ :color, :homepage ], coder: JSON def color super || 'red' end end
-
- 28 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
This caused a bug with the new associations implementation, because now association conditions are represented as Arel nodes internally right up to when the whole thing gets turned to SQL. In Rails 3.2, association conditions get turned to raw SQL early on, which prevents Relation#merge from interfering. The current implementation was buggy when a default_scope existed on the target model, since we would basically end up doing: default_scope.merge(association_scope) If default_scope contained a where(foo: 'a') and association_scope contained a where(foo: 'b').where(foo: 'c') then the merger would see that the same column is representated on both sides of the merge and collapse the wheres to all but the last: where(foo: 'c') Now, the RHS of the merge is left alone. Fixes #8990
-
- 27 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Derek Kraan 提交于
because of an ambiguous column name. This happened if the association model had a default scope that referenced a third table, and the third table also referenced the original table (with an identical foreign_key). Mysql requires that ambiguous columns are deambiguated by using the full table.column syntax. Postgresql and Sqlite use a different syntax for updates altogether (and don't tolerate table.name syntax), so the fix requires always including the full table.column and discarding it later for Sqlite and Postgresql.
-
- 24 1月, 2013 7 次提交
-
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
This reverts commit 4e05bfb8. Reason: BlankTopic#blank? should not be removed to check that dynamic finder with a bang can find a model that responds to `blank?`
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
- 23 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
The native JSON library bypasses the `to_json` overrides in active_support/core_ext/object/to_json.rb by calling its native implementation directly. However `ActiveRecord::Store` uses a HWIA so `JSON.dump` will call our `to_json` instead with a `State` object for options rather than a `Hash`. This generates a warning when the `:encoding`, `:only` & `:except` keys are accessed in `Hash#as_json` because the `State` object delegates unknown keys to `instance_variable_get` in its `:[]` method. Workaround this warning in the test by using a custom coder that calls `ActiveSupport::JSON.encode` directly.
-
- 20 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Geihsler 提交于
-
- 18 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
Suggested by @dhh. It doesn't affect the generated SQL, so seems reasonable to continue to allow it as an association option.
-