- 27 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Atack 提交于
- ‘dection’ -> ‘detection’ - ‘exceeds threshold’ -> ‘exceeds the threshold’ - Other minor improvements.
-
- 26 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Nochlin 提交于
When set to an integer, a warning will be logged whenever a result set larger than the specified size is returned by a query. Fixes #16463 The warning is outputed a module which is prepended in an initializer, so there will be no performance impact if `config.active_record.warn_on_records_fetched_greater_than` is not set.
-
- 25 3月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Lars Kanis 提交于
This obsoletes the ruby based implementations.
-
由 Lars Kanis 提交于
The type map was introduced in aafee233, but wasn't properly filled. This mainly adjusts many locations, that expected strings instead of integers or boolean. add_pg_decoders is moved after setup of the StatementPool, because execute_and_clear could potentially make use of it.
-
由 Lars Kanis 提交于
Ruby-pg's default way to serialize values for transmission to the database is to call #to_s . This however creates a temporary String object for each value. Setting a class based type map avoids the allocation of this additional String. The performance benefit is measurable in microbenchmarks, but not with the overhead of activerecord. However it's free to use and has no drawback.
-
由 Jason Weathered 提交于
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
This reverts commit 5cfa6a8a, reversing changes made to bfd5bf83. Reason: This broken travis build.
-
- 24 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Cody Cutrer 提交于
the newer method used for discriminating new records did not use the older and more robust method used for instantiating existing records, but did have a better post-check to ensure the sublass was in the hierarchy. so move the descendants check to find_sti_class, and then simply call find_sti_class from subclass_from_attributes
-
由 yui-knk 提交于
-
- 23 3月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Gaurav Sharma 提交于
-
由 Gaurav Sharma 提交于
-
由 Matthew Draper 提交于
This is obviously all very internal, but sometimes you have to look at it... and when you do, it'll save a lot of confusion if it doesn't lie about its identity.
-
由 Matthew Draper 提交于
The subtype will (quite reasonably) ignore the possibility that it has `changed_in_place?` by becoming nil. Fixes #19467
-
- 22 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 pinglamb 提交于
association While joining table of has_many :through association, ActiveRecord will use the actual table name instead of through-join alias. It results with a wrong SQL and exception is raised. This only happens when calculation methods like #count is called. This issue is affecting Rails 4.1.x and 4.2.x as well.
-
由 wallerjake 提交于
As described here https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/19420. When using the Postgres BigInt[] field type the big int value was not being translated into schema.rb. This caused the field to become just a regular integer field when building off of schema.rb. This fix will address this by delegating the limit from the subtype to the Array type. https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/19420
-
- 21 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Van Dyk 提交于
The code in the comment fails on concurrent inserts if done inside a transaction. The fix is to force a savepoint to run so that if the database raises an unique violation exception. Otherwise, you'll get errors like: ``` (0.3ms) BEGIN Cart Load (0.5ms) SELECT "carts".* FROM "carts" WHERE "carts"."uuid" = '12345' LIMIT 1 # Another process inserts a cart with uuid of '12345' right now SQL (4371.7ms) INSERT INTO "carts" ("created_at", "updated_at", "uuid") VALUES ('2015-03-21 01:05:07.833231', '2015-03-21 01:05:07.833231', '12345') RETURNING "id" [["created_at", Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:05:07 PDT -07:00], ["updated_at", Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:05:07 PDT -07:00], ["uuid", "12345"]] PG::UniqueViolation: ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "carts_uuid_idx1" DETAIL: Key (uuid)=(12345) already exists. : INSERT INTO "carts" ("created_at", "updated_at", "uuid") VALUES ('2015-03-21 01:05:07.833231', '2015-03-21 01:05:07.833231', '12345') RETURNING "id" # Retrying the find Cart Load (0.8ms) SELECT "carts".* FROM "carts" WHERE "carts"."uuid" = '12345' LIMIT 1 PG::InFailedSqlTransaction: ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block : SELECT "carts".* FROM "carts" WHERE "carts"."uuid" = '12345' LIMIT 1 (0.1ms) ROLLBACK ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: PG::InFailedSqlTransaction: ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block : SELECT "carts".* FROM "carts" WHERE "carts"."uuid" = '12345' LIMIT 1 ```
-
- 20 3月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 yui-knk 提交于
-
由 Jeremy Kemper 提交于
Preserving RACK_ENV behavior. This reverts commit 7bdc7635, reversing changes made to 45786be5.
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
Fixes #19389.
-
由 amitkumarsuroliya 提交于
-
- 19 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 amitkumarsuroliya 提交于
-
由 amitkumarsuroliya 提交于
-
由 Damien Mathieu 提交于
-
- 18 3月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 eileencodes 提交于
In the tests if I were to call `post.categorizations.to_a` and then later call `post.categorizations.to_a` expecting to have different results the 2 queries would be the same because of the caching involved in `@association_scope_cache`. The chain gets cached and the queries will be the same even if they are not supposed to be (i.e. testing an order dependent scoping issue). I found this issue because I was working on a bug with cached scoped in hm:t and hm:t polymorphic relationships but `capture_sql` was outputting the wrong SQL to write a good test.
-
由 Alexander Leishman 提交于
Update link in comments to point to latest MySQL production version documentation. See here for reference: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/choosing-version.html
-
由 Ben Woosley 提交于
-
由 Ryan Wallace 提交于
Fixes db:structure:dump when using schema_search_path and PostgreSQL extensions. Closes #17157.
-
- 17 3月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Woosley 提交于
It is redundant with tests in `eager_loading?`, but for the difference between `includes_values.present?` and `includes_values.any?`, which is a difference without a distinction because `false` has no meaning for `includes`.
-
由 keepcosmos 提交于
-
由 Brandon Weiss 提交于
I’m renaming all instances of `use_transcational_fixtures` to `use_transactional_tests` and “transactional fixtures” to “transactional tests”. I’m deprecating `use_transactional_fixtures=`. So anyone who is explicitly setting this will get a warning telling them to use `use_transactional_tests=` instead. I’m maintaining backwards compatibility—both forms will work. `use_transactional_tests` will check to see if `use_transactional_fixtures` is set and use that, otherwise it will use itself. But because `use_transactional_tests` is a class attribute (created with `class_attribute`) this requires a little bit of hoop jumping. The writer method that `class_attribute` generates defines a new reader method that return the value being set. Which means we can’t set the default of `true` using `use_transactional_tests=` as was done previously because that won’t take into account anyone using `use_transactional_fixtures`. Instead I defined the reader method manually and it checks `use_transactional_fixtures`. If it was set then it should be used, otherwise it should return the default, which is `true`. If someone uses `use_transactional_tests=` then it will overwrite the backwards-compatible method with whatever they set.
-
由 Yasuo Honda 提交于
to support MySQL 5.7.6 `optimizer_switch='derived_merge=on'`
-
- 16 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Woosley 提交于
When a new record has the necessary information prior to save, we can avoid busting the cache. We could simply clear the @proxy on #reset or #reset_scope, but that would clear the cache more often than necessary.
-
- 15 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 eileencodes 提交于
If there was a polymorphic hm:t association with a scope AND second non-scoped hm:t association on a model the polymorphic scope would leak through into the call for the non-polymorhic hm:t association. This would only break if `hotel.drink_designers` was called before `hotel.recipes`. If `hotel.recipes` was called first there would be no problem with the SQL. Before (employable_type should not be here): ``` SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "drink_designers" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON "drink_designers"."id" = "chefs"."employable_id" INNER JOIN "departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" = "departments"."id" WHERE "departments"."hotel_id" = ? AND "chefs"."employable_type" = ? [["hotel_id", 1], ["employable_type", "DrinkDesigner"]] ``` After: ``` SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "recipes" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON "recipes"."chef_id" = "chefs"."id" INNER JOIN "departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" = "departments"."id" WHERE "departments"."hotel_id" = ? [["hotel_id", 1]] ``` From the SQL you can see that `employable_type` was leaking through when calling recipes. The solution is to dup the chain of the polymorphic association so it doesn't get cached. Additionally, this follows `scope_chain` which dup's the `source_reflection`'s `scope_chain`. This required another model/table/relationship because the leak only happens on a hm:t polymorphic that's called before another hm:t on the same model. I am specifically testing the SQL here instead of the number of records becasue the test could pass if there was 1 drink designer recipe for the drink designer chef even though the `employable_type` was leaking through. This needs to specifically check that `employable_type` is not in the SQL statement.
-
由 keepcosmos 提交于
-
由 Arthur Neves 提交于
-
- 12 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Woosley 提交于
Instead use .scope_attributes? consistently in ActiveRecord to check whether there are attributes currently associated with the scope. Move the implementation of .scope_attributes? and .scope_attributes to ActiveRecord::Scoping because they don't particularly have to do specifically with Named scopes and their only dependency, in the case of .scope_attributes?, and only caller, in the case of .scope_attributes is contained in Scoping.
-
由 Matt Brictson 提交于
Versions of the pg gem earlier than 0.18.0 cannot be used safely with Ruby 2.2. Specifically, pg 0.17 when used with Ruby 2.2 has a known bug that causes random bits to be added to the end of strings. Further explanation here: https://bitbucket.org/ged/ruby-pg/issue/210/crazy-bytes-being-added-to-record
-
由 Jeremy Kemper 提交于
This introduces undesirable `Rails.logger` formatters (such as the syslog formatter) onto a `Logger.new(STDERR)` for the console. The production logger may be going elsewhere than standard io, so we can't presume to reuse its formatter. With syslog, this causes missing newlines in the console, so irb prompts start at the end of the last log message. We can work to expose the console formatter in another way to address the original issue. This reverts commit 026ce5dd, reversing changes made to 6f0a69c5.
-
- 11 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yves Senn 提交于
There was a typo in the `:requires_new` option. This led to `#<ArgumentError: unknown keyword: require_new>` leaving all the triggers in a disabled state.