- 27 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josh Kalderimis 提交于
-
- 28 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sebastian Martinez 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
由 Sebastian Martinez 提交于
This reverts commit 45c233ef. Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sebastian Martinez 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 10 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josh Kalderimis 提交于
removed some duplication from LH issue 5505 regarding AR touch and optimistic locking [#5505 state:resolved] Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino and José Ignacio Costa <santiago+jose@wyeworks.com>
-
由 Franck Verrot 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino and José Ignacio Costa <santiago+jose@wyeworks.com>
-
- 29 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
- 28 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
- 03 12月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 28 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Valim 提交于
-
- 20 11月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emilio Tagua 提交于
-
由 Marcin Raczkowski 提交于
-
- 12 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Franck Verrot 提交于
-
- 10 11月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
- 09 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Chelimsky 提交于
- persisted? is the API defined in ActiveModel - makes it easier for extension libraries to conform to ActiveModel APIs without concern for whether the extended object is specifically ActiveRecord [#5927 state:committed] Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 tnp 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emilio Tagua 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Joost Baaij 提交于
Worse still, its use breaks some rdoc, replacing method names with a curly brace. Having just one call-seq directive doesn't add anything since this is covered by regular rdoc. Having multiple might make sense, but these are already documented with examples. This partly re-reverts 60de0e56 but does not touch the vendorized code in html-scanner.
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
Revert "call-seq directive makes rdoc cry and replaces method names with a curly brace; besides it doesn't add anything when you only list one call example since this is obviously documented already" Reason: Part of this commit touches vendorized stuff, the rest is fine, could you please repatch? This reverts commit 60de0e56.
-
由 Joost Baaij 提交于
call-seq directive makes rdoc cry and replaces method names with a curly brace; besides it doesn't add anything when you only list one call example since this is obviously documented already
-
- 25 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
-
- 24 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
[#5439 state:resolved] Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 12 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Valim 提交于
Make update_attribute behave as in Rails 2.3 and document the behavior intrinsic to its implementation.
-
- 05 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
-
- 03 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 02 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 José Valim 提交于
-
- 29 7月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 28 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 22 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 21 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
[#5106 state:resolved] Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
-
- 14 7月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
revises the rdoc of update_attributes and update_attributes! to document they are wrapped in a transaction, and adds code comments explaining why
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
[#922 state:resovled] Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 13 7月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 José Valim 提交于
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
with this fix touch method - does not call validations - doest not call callbacks - updates updated_at/on along with attribute if attribute is provided - marks udpated_at/on and attribute as NOT changed [#2520 state:resolved] Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-