- 08 11月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Benjamin 提交于
PKCS #1 v2.0 is the name of a document which specifies an algorithm RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5, often referred to as "PKCS #1 v1.5" after an earlier document which specified it. This gets further confusing because the document PKCS #1 v2.1 specifies two signature algorithms, RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 and RSASSA-PSS. RSA_sign implements RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5. Refer to the document using the RFC number which is easier to find anyway, and refer to the algorithm by its name. Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #1474
-
由 David Benjamin 提交于
RFC 3447, section 8.2.2, steps 3 and 4 states that verifiers must encode the DigestInfo struct and then compare the result against the public key operation result. This implies that one and only one encoding is legal. OpenSSL instead parses with crypto/asn1, then checks that the encoding round-trips, and allows some variations for the parameter. Sufficient laxness in this area can allow signature forgeries, as described in https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/09/26/pkcs1.html Although there aren't known attacks against OpenSSL's current scheme, this change makes OpenSSL implement the algorithm as specified. This avoids the uncertainty and, more importantly, helps grow a healthy ecosystem. Laxness beyond the spec, particularly in implementations which enjoy wide use, risks harm to the ecosystem for all. A signature producer which only tests against OpenSSL may not notice bugs and accidentally become widely deployed. Thus implementations have a responsibility to honor the specification as tightly as is practical. In some cases, the damage is permanent and the spec deviation and security risk becomes a tax all implementors must forever pay, but not here. Both BoringSSL and Go successfully implemented and deployed RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 as specified since their respective beginnings, so this change should be compatible enough to pin down in future OpenSSL releases. See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-00 As a bonus, by not having to deal with sign/verify differences, this version is also somewhat clearer. It also more consistently enforces digest lengths in the verify_recover codepath. The NID_md5_sha1 codepath wasn't quite doing this right. Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #1474
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
This partially reverts commit c636c1c4. It also tweaks the documentation and comments in this area. On the client side the documented interface for SSL_CTX_set_verify()/SSL_set_verify() is that setting the flag SSL_VERIFY_PEER causes verfication of the server certificate to take place. Previously what was implemented was that if *any* flag was set then verification would take place. The above commit improved the semantics to be as per the documented interface. However, we have had a report of at least one application where an application was incorrectly using the interface and used *only* SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT on the client side. In OpenSSL prior to the above commit this still caused verification of the server certificate to take place. After this commit the application silently failed to verify the server certificate. Ideally SSL_CTX_set_verify()/SSL_set_verify() could be modified to indicate if invalid flags were being used. However these are void functions! The simplest short term solution is to revert to the previous behaviour which at least means we "fail closed" rather than "fail open". Thanks to Cory Benfield for reporting this issue. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 07 11月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
1) Remove some unnecessary fixtures 2) Add EXECUTE_TEST_NO_TEARDOWN shorthand when a fixture exists but has no teardown. 3) Fix return values in ct_test.c (introduced by an earlier refactoring, oops) Note that for parameterized tests, the index (test vector) usually holds all the customization, and there should be no need for a separate test fixture. The CTS test is an exception: it demonstrates how to combine customization with parameterization. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Prior to TLS1.3 we check that the received record version number is correct. In TLS1.3 we need to ignore the record version number. This adds a test to make sure we do it correctly. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
The record layer version field must be ignored in TLSv1.3, so we remove the check when using that version. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
We may get failures if we run it in TLS1.3, and it makes no sense anyway so force TLS1.2 Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
We have one TLS1.3 ciphersuite, but there is a typo in the id that should be corrected. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
We read it later in grow_init_buf(). If CCS is the first thing received in a flight, then it will use the init_msg from the last flight we received. If the init_buf has been grown in the meantime then it will point to some arbitrary other memory location. This is likely to result in grow_init_buf() attempting to grow to some excessively large amount which is likely to fail. In practice this should never happen because the only time we receive a CCS as the first thing in a flight is in an abbreviated handshake. None of the preceding messages from the server flight would be large enough to trigger this. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1772)
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
If zlib-dynamic was given but not --with-zlib-lib, LIBZ was defined to the empty string. Instead, give it the default "ZLIB1". Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1772)
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
VMS only unloads shared libraries at process rundown, so tell the OpenSSL code so by pretending we linked with -znodelete. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1862)
-
- 05 11月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1856)
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Since the local symbol table is looked up before the global symbol table, 'arch' assigned in the local symbol table of the DCL where MMS is called would be seen before the 'arch' defined in descrip.mms. Assigning it to the local symbol table in descrip.mms removes that issue. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1853)
-
- 04 11月, 2016 26 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1849)
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
The sources for internal tests were sometimes badly formed, assuming perl variables such as $target{cpuid_asm_src} contains only one file name. This change correctly massages all file names in such a variable. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1850)
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This is related to a lack in path merging involding includes of includes Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1846)
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
The logic around avoiding MULDEF warnings was flawed. Simplifying it makes it better. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1846)
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
The test fixtures are (meant to be) useful for sharing common setup. Don't bother when we don't have any setup/teardown. This only addresses simple tests. Parameterized tests (ADD_ALL_TESTS) will be made more user-friendly in a follow-up. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Clang on Linux seems to catch things that we might miss otherwise. Also, throw in 'no-deprecated' to make sure we test that as well. Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1839)
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
pqueue_size() now returns a size_t, but the variable that gets returned was still declared as an int. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Travis is reporting one file at a time shadowed variable warnings where "read" has been used. This attempts to go through all of libssl and replace "read" with "readbytes" to fix all the problems in one go. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Give more detail on what constitutes success/failure. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Rename "read" to "readbytes" Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Improvements to style, grammar etc. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Based on review feedback. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Travis was failing in some builds due to a bogus complaint about uninit variables. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Also document SSL_peek() which was missing from the docs. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Also implement the using of them Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-