- 21 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 01 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
PR: 1086
-
- 20 2月, 2001 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
sure they are available in opensslconf.h, by giving them names starting with "OPENSSL_" to avoid conflicts with other packages and by making sure e_os2.h will cover all platform-specific cases together with opensslconf.h. I've checked fairly well that nothing breaks with this (apart from external software that will adapt if they have used something like NO_KRB5), but I can't guarantee it completely, so a review of this change would be a good thing.
-
- 31 1月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
eliminate some of the -Wcast-qual warnings (debug-ben-strict target)
-
- 28 1月, 2000 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
New function BN_pseudo_rand(). Use BN_prime_checks_size(BN_num_bits(w)) rounds of Miller-Rabin when generating DSA primes (why not use BN_is_prime()?)
-
- 05 9月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
"Clean-up" stands for the fact that it's using common message digest template ../md32_common.h and sha[1_]dgst.c are reduced down to '#define SHA_[01]' and then '#include "sha_locl.h"'. It stands "(LP64)" there because it's 64 bit platforms which benefit most from the tune-up. The updated code exhibits 40% performance improvement on IRIX64 (sounds too good, huh? I probably should double check if it's not some cache trashing that was holding it back before), 28% - on Alpha Linux and 12% - Solaris 7/64.
-
- 12 6月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 26 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
-
- 10 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
so that warnings about unused variables (for certain -D... constellations) are avoided; this corresponds to the earlier change for SHA1. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 05 5月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
-
- 27 4月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 24 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 21 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
Pointed out by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>.
-
- 20 4月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Möller 提交于
-
- 22 3月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 31 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b 2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more 0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change). tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- 23 12月, 1998 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 22 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 21 12月, 1998 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-