- 22 2月, 2016 10 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
When building a DSO, there's no reason to include all symbols from static libraries it happens to link with, whichever they may be. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Preserved for now for those who have scripts with the option "no-ssl2". We warn that it's deprecated, and ignore it otherwise. In response to RT#4330 Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Building shared libraries or not is not the same as building position independent code or not. It's true that if you don't build PIC, you can't build shared libraries. However, you may very well want to build only static libraries but still want PIC code. Therefore, we introduce a new configuration option "pic", which is enabled by default or explicitely with "enable-pic", or disabled with "no-pic" or "disable-pic". Of course, if "pic" is disabled, "shared" and "dynamic-engine" are automatically disabled as well. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
We were kinda sorta using a mix of $disabled{"static-engine" and $disabled{"dynamic-engine"} in Configure. Let's avoid confusion, choose one of them and stick to it. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
An error was introduced with the setting of SHLIB in DO_GNU_SO. A common DO_GNU_SO_COMMON that both DO_GNU_SO and DO_GNU_SO_NOCALC use makes things clearer. Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Because we're requiring Perl 5.10.0 and the 'parent' didn't appear before Perl 5.10.1, we need to resort to the older parent module declaration style, modifying @ISA. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
On slower file systems, this makes a huge difference Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
GNU make will re-exec if (it thinks that) the Makefile has changed. Just having the target Makefile seems to make it think it has, so we end up in a look where GNU make re-execs for ever. The fix is easy, just remove the Makefile target and have the depend target run the recipe on its own instead of depending on Makefile. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Viktor Dukhovni 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
is a .s). Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
- 20 2月, 2016 14 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Don't check for no_shared Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
They depend on this feature because they use the engine ossltest, which is only available as a dynamic engine. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Until now, the engines in engines/ were only built as dynamicaly loadable ones if shared libraries were built. We not dissociate the two and can build dynamicaly loadable engines even if we only build static libcrypto and libssl. This is controlled with the option (enable|disable|no)-static-engine, defaulting to no-static-engine. Note that the engines in crypto/engine/ (dynamic and cryptodev) will always be built into libcrypto. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This takes us away from the idea that we know exactly how our static libraries are going to get used. Instead, we make them available to build shareable things with, be it other shared libraries or DSOs. On the other hand, we also have greater control of when the shared library cflags. They will never be used with object files meant got binaries, such as apps/openssl or test/test*. With unified, we take this a bit further and prepare for having to deal with extra cflags specifically to be used with DSOs (dynamic engines), libraries and binaries (applications). Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Depending on Makefile meant that a new attempt to rebuild the Makefile with "new" dependency data was done all the time, uncontrolled. Better to depend on configdata.pm, which truly only changes with reconfiguration. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NBen Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
-
由 Kurt Roeckx 提交于
Also gives an error message when you gave it a parameter it didn't expect. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> MR: #2009
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
One spot was forgotten. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Object LiBrary Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
It failed to remove lingering Makefile.new Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
It was turning off output again in two place where it should have turned it on. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Remove DSA private key code which tolerates broken implementations which use negative integers. Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Remove old code that handled various invalid DSA formats in ancient software. This also fixes a double free bug when parsing malformed DSA private keys. Thanks to Adam Langley (Google/BoringSSL) for discovering this bug using libFuzzer. CVE-2016-0705 Reviewed-by: NEmilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
Adapted from BoringSSL. Added a test. The extension parsing code is already attempting to already handle this for some individual extensions, but it is doing so inconsistently. Duplicate efforts in individual extension parsing will be cleaned up in a follow-up. Reviewed-by: NStephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
- 19 2月, 2016 10 次提交
-
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
This silences the memory sanitizer. All fields were already correctly initialized but the struct padding wasn't, causing an uninitialized read warning. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
由 Viktor Szakats 提交于
crypto.h: honor no-filenames config setting in missing cases Signed-off-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com> Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
So far, MingW shared libraries were named like this libeay32.dll + libeay32.dll.a ssleay32.dll + ssleay32.dll.a That naming scheme is antiquated, a reminicense of SSLeay. We're therefore changing the scheme to something that's more like the rest of OpenSSL. There are two factors to remember: - Windows libraries have no recorded SOvers, which means that the shared library version must be encoded in the name. According to some, it's unwise to encode extra periods in a Windows file name, so we convert version number periods to underscores. - MingW has multilib ability. However, DLLs need to reside with the binaries that use them, so to allow both 32-bit and 64-bit DLLs to reside in the same place, we add '-x64' in the name of the 64-bit ones. The resulting name scheme (for SOver 1.1) is this: on x86: libcrypto-1_1.dll + libcrypto.dll.a libssl-1_1.dll + libssl.dll.a on x86_64: libcrypto-1_1-x64.dll + libcrypto.dll.a libssl-1_1-x64.dll + libssl.dll.a An observation is that the import lib is the same for both architectures. Not to worry, though, as they will be installed in PREFIX/lib/ for x86 and PREFIX/lib64/ for x86_64. As a side effect, MingW got its own targets in Makefile.shared. link_dso.mingw-shared and link_app.mingw-shared are aliases for the corresponding cygwin-shared targets. link_shlib.mingw-shared is, however, a target separated from the cygwin one. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Better libclean that removes the exact files that have been built, nothing more and nothing less. Corrected typo A couple of editorial changes. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Of course, if there are remaining files in a directory, it won't be removed. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Since we're using the acronym DSO everywhere else and that's a common name for that kind of object, we might as well do so here as well. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Instead of having the installation recipe rely on special knowledge, feed it with information, including what shared library files belong together. For Cygwin and Mingw, that's the .dll and its import library .dll.a. For Unixen, it's the shared library file name with SO version and the one without. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
The engine DSOs were named as if they were shared libraries, and could end up having all sorts of fancy names: Cygwin: cygFOO.dll Mingw: FOOeay32.dll Unix: libFOO.so / libFOO.sl / libFOO.dylib / ... This may be confusing, since they look like libraries one should link with at link time, when they're just DSOs. It's therefore time to rename them, and do it consistently on all platforms: Cygwin & Mingw: FOO.dll Unix: FOO.{so,sl,dylib,...} Interestingly enough, the MSVC and VMS builds always did it this way. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Because we know for certain that the link_shlib targets are used exclusively for shared libraries (libcrypto and libssl) and that they must have an associated .num file, we don't need to check the library name to produce an ld script. Just do it unconditionally. link_shlib.linux-shared can be simplified further, as most of it is exactly the same as $(DO_GNU_SO) with just one variable modification. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-