- 02 7月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
The recent merge of https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264 removed some trailing whitespace from the generated file obj_dat.h. Unfortunately obj_dat.pl kept re-adding it. Clean up the script and the output it generates. Add 'use strict / use warnings' Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Now that INCLUDE considers both the source and build trees, no need for the rel2abs perl fragment hacks any more. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
INCLUDE statements in build.info files were source tree centric. That meant that to get include directory specs in the build tree, we had to resort to perl fragments that specified the build tree include paths as absolute ones. This change has the INCLUDE statement consider both the source and build tree for any include directory. It means that there may be some extra unnecessary include paths, but it also makes life simpler for anyone who makes changes in the build.info files. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
- 01 7月, 2016 14 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Kurt Roeckx 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> GH: #1276
-
由 Kurt Roeckx 提交于
Fixes #1260 Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> GH: #1266
-
由 Kurt Roeckx 提交于
malloc(0) might return NULL and code for the old callbacks might fail, instead just say they should allocate 1 entry. Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> GH: #1266
-
由 mrpre 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1223)
-
由 mrpre 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1223)
-
由 Alessandro Ghedini 提交于
Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Henson <steve@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1273)
-
由 Viktor Szakats 提交于
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1275)
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Even though it's hard to imagine, it turned out that upper half of arguments passed to V8+ subroutine can be non-zero. ["n" pseudo-instructions, such as srln being srl in 32-bit case and srlx in 64-bit one, were implemented in binutils 2.10. It's assumed that Solaris assembler implemented it around same time, i.e. 2000.] Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
$prefix was removed as part of the DESTDIR work. However, it was still used to create the ENGINESDIR_dev and ENGINESDIR_dir variables, so a restoration is needed. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1244)
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1244)
-
- 30 6月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Ensure things really do get cleared when we intend them to. Addresses an OCAP Audit issue. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Remove some lingering references to removed functionality from docs. Reviewed-by: NStephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
由 Matt Caswell 提交于
Commit 361a1191 removed all ciphersuites that could support temporary RSA keys, therefore the associated functions were removed. We should have "no-op" compatibility macros for these. Reviewed-by: NStephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
-
由 Kurt Cancemi 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1267)
-
由 Rich Salz 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
When the proxy cert code was initially added, some application authors wanted to get them verified without having to change their code, so a check of the env var OPENSSL_ALLOW_PROXY_CERTS was added. Since then, the use of this variable has become irrelevant, as it's likely that code has been changed since, so it's time it gets removed. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
-
- 29 6月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
"configured on the local system". Whatever that means. Example that is biting me is loopback has ::1 as an address, but the network interface is v4 only. Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Alex Gaynor 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Reviewed-by: NEmilia Kasper <emilia@openssl.org> GH: #1255
-
- 28 6月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
Observe that the old tests were partly ill-defined: setting sn_server1 but not sn_server2 in ssltest_old.c does not enable the SNI callback. Fix this, and also explicitly test both flavours of SNI mismatch (ignore / fatal alert). Tests still pass. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Emilia Kasper 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
DESTDIR can't be used on Windows the same way as on Unix, the device part of the installation paths get in the way. To remedy this, have INSTALLTOP, OPENSSLDIR and ENGINESDIR get different values depending on if $(DESTDIR) is empty or not, and use $(INSTALLTOP), $(OPENSSLDIR) and $(ENGINESDIR) alone. Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
-
由 Roumen Petrov 提交于
This is just in case someone passed an inclusion path with the configuration, and there are OpenSSL headers from another version in there. Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Since corresponding rule was removed from windows-makefile.tmpl out of necessity, question popped if it's appropriate to harmonize even unix-Makefile.tmpl. Note that as long as you work on single directory 'make lib<rary>.a' is effectively equivalent to 'make <dir/ectory>' prior this modification. Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Problem with Microsoft lib.exe is that it doesn't *update* modules in .lib archive, but creates new one upon every invocation. As result if a source file was updated and nmake was executed, a useless archive with only one module was created. In other words one has to always pass all .obj modules on command line, not only recently recompiled. [This also creates dilemma for directory targets, e.g. crypto\aes, that were added to simplify every-day life for developer. Since whole idea behind those targets is to minimize the re-compile time upon single file modification, the only sensible thing to do is to omit intended library update.] Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
-