- 02 12月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
proper implementation of bn_div_words() for VAX. If the tests go through well, the next step will be to test on Alpha.
-
- 01 12月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 366
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 366
-
- 29 11月, 2002 6 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 360
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
symlink to said manpage. PR: 242
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
I *think* I got them all covered by now, bu please, if you find any more, tell me and I'll correct it. PR: 343
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
always give the expected result on some platforms.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 28 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
I've covered all the memset()s I felt safe modifying, but may have missed some.
-
- 27 11月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
and linker optimizations. PR: 343
-
- 26 11月, 2002 5 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
incorrect. Fortunately, there is a second check that's correct, when adding the pads. PR: 355
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
to force the use of Heimdal, and warn if that's used. PR: 346
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 349
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
to force the use of Heimdal, and warn if that's used. PR: 346
-
- 24 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Sheueling Chang
-
- 22 11月, 2002 4 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 20 11月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
for Montgomery representations. Submitted by: Sheueling Chang, Bodo Moeller
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
caching (#288): now internal caching failed (#351): Make sure, that cipher_id is set before comparing. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR: 288 (and 351)
-
- 19 11月, 2002 10 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(we can't release it before the CRYPTO_mem_leaks() call!) Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
defined as follows (according to X.509_4thEditionDraftV6.pdf): CertificatePair ::= SEQUENCE { forward [0] Certificate OPTIONAL, reverse [1] Certificate OPTIONAL, -- at least one of the pair shall be present -- } The only thing I'm not sure about is if it's implicit or explicit tags that I should count on. For now, I'm thinking explicit, but will gladly stand corrected. Also implement the PEM functions to read and write certificate pairs, and defined the PEM tag as "CERTIFICATE PAIR". This needed to be defined, mostly for the sake of the LDAP attribute crossCertificatePair, but may prove useful elsewhere as well.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 18 11月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-