- 09 12月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
- a patch to fix a memory leak in rsa_gen.c - a note about compiler warnings with unions - a note about improving structure element names This applies his patch and implements a solution to the notes.
-
- 08 12月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
key-generation and prime-checking functions. Rather than explicitly passing callback functions and caller-defined context data for the callbacks, a new structure BN_GENCB is defined that encapsulates this; a pointer to the structure is passed to all such functions instead. This wrapper structure allows the encapsulation of "old" and "new" style callbacks - "new" callbacks return a boolean result on the understanding that returning FALSE should terminate keygen/primality processing. The BN_GENCB abstraction will allow future callback modifications without needing to break binary compatibility nor change the API function prototypes. The new API functions have been given names ending in "_ex" and the old functions are implemented as wrappers to the new ones. The OPENSSL_NO_DEPRECATED symbol has been introduced so that, if defined, declaration of the older functions will be skipped. NB: Some openssl-internal code will stick with the older callbacks for now, so appropriate "#undef" logic will be put in place - this is in case the user is *building* openssl (rather than *including* its headers) with this symbol defined. There is another change in the new _ex functions; the key-generation functions do not return key structures but operate on structures passed by the caller, the return value is a boolean. This will allow for a smoother transition to having key-generation as "virtual function" in the various ***_METHOD tables.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
stateless variant is kept, but isn't used anywhere.
-
- 07 12月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Polyakov 提交于
Submitted by: <appro> Reviewed by: PR:
-
- 06 12月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
anything.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
a first alternative to try
-
- 05 12月, 2002 7 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 376
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 381
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
rule for SHA stuff. PR: 381
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(length of the order of the group, not length of the actual key, which will be shorter in some cases). Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Include X9.62 signature examples. Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
- 04 12月, 2002 4 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Make ASN1_TYPE_get() work for V_ASN1_NULL type.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
return the requested number of bytes when reading content.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 03 12月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
the divisor was a bit more complex than I first saw. The lost bit can't just be discarded, as there are cases where it is important. For example, look at dividing 320000 with 80000 vs. 80001 (all decimals), the difference is crucial. The trick here is to check if that lost bit was 1, and in that case, do the following: 1. subtract the quotient from the remainder 2. as long as the remainder is negative, add the divisor (the whole divisor, not the shofted down copy) to it, and decrease the quotient by one. There's probably a nice mathematical proof for this already, but I won't bother with that, unless someone requests it from me.
-
- 02 12月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
proper implementation of bn_div_words() for VAX. If the tests go through well, the next step will be to test on Alpha.
-
- 01 12月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 366
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 366
-
- 29 11月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 360
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
I *think* I got them all covered by now, bu please, if you find any more, tell me and I'll correct it. PR: 343
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
always give the expected result on some platforms.
-
- 28 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
I've covered all the memset()s I felt safe modifying, but may have missed some.
-
- 27 11月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
and linker optimizations. PR: 343
-
- 26 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
incorrect. Fortunately, there is a second check that's correct, when adding the pads. PR: 355
-
- 24 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Sheueling Chang
-
- 22 11月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 20 11月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
for Montgomery representations. Submitted by: Sheueling Chang, Bodo Moeller
-
- 19 11月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
defined as follows (according to X.509_4thEditionDraftV6.pdf): CertificatePair ::= SEQUENCE { forward [0] Certificate OPTIONAL, reverse [1] Certificate OPTIONAL, -- at least one of the pair shall be present -- } The only thing I'm not sure about is if it's implicit or explicit tags that I should count on. For now, I'm thinking explicit, but will gladly stand corrected. Also implement the PEM functions to read and write certificate pairs, and defined the PEM tag as "CERTIFICATE PAIR". This needed to be defined, mostly for the sake of the LDAP attribute crossCertificatePair, but may prove useful elsewhere as well.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-