1. 30 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 29 12月, 2008 4 次提交
  3. 27 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  4. 21 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 14 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  6. 25 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 16 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  8. 13 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 12 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  10. 11 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 02 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  12. 29 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 27 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 22 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 20 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 13 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  17. 12 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  18. 10 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      When the underlying BIO_write() fails to send a datagram, we leave the · 7e7af0bc
      Lutz Jänicke 提交于
      offending record queued as 'pending'. The DTLS code doesn't expect this,
      and we end up hitting an OPENSSL_assert() in do_dtls1_write().
      
      The simple fix is just _not_ to leave it queued. In DTLS, dropping
      packets is perfectly acceptable -- and even preferable. If we wanted a
      service with retries and guaranteed delivery, we'd be using TCP.
      PR: #1703
      Submitted by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      7e7af0bc
  19. 23 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  20. 15 9月, 2008 3 次提交
  21. 14 9月, 2008 3 次提交
  22. 11 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 04 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  24. 03 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  25. 14 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  26. 06 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • G
      Remove the dual-callback scheme for numeric and pointer thread IDs, · 4c329696
      Geoff Thorpe 提交于
      deprecate the original (numeric-only) scheme, and replace with the
      CRYPTO_THREADID object. This hides the platform-specifics and should reduce
      the possibility for programming errors (where failing to explicitly check
      both thread ID forms could create subtle, platform-specific bugs).
      
      Thanks to Bodo, for invaluable review and feedback.
      4c329696