- 22 6月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
In anticipation of Unicode 7.0 data coming in the next commit.
-
- 21 6月, 2014 14 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No functional change.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No output change.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No functional change.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No functional change.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No functional change.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
We don't need Indic table for those.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-#define indic_offset_total 4416 +#define indic_offset_total 3816 -}; /* Table occupancy: 60% */ +}; /* Table occupancy: 69% */
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No functional change.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
HB_VERSION_CHECK's comparison was originally written wrongly by mistake. When API tests were written, they were also written wrongly to pass given the wrong implementation... Sigh. Given the purpose of this API, there's no point in fixing it without renaming it. As such, rename. API changes: HB_VERSION_CHECK -> HB_VERSION_ATLEAST hb_version_check -> hb_version_atleast
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 20 6月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Kew 提交于
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986802 Fixes https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/pull/39 API Change: -hb_ot_layout_language_get_required_feature_index +hb_ot_layout_language_get_required_feature New API takes an extra pointer argument. Pass NULL in to get behavior of previous API. Reworked by behdad
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Such that the complexity of the algorithm used is clear at call site.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
In an effort to make the algorithm used clear.
-
- 19 6月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Still needs update to joining table to fully work.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 17 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 13 6月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Kew 提交于
...so that they overstrike preceding glyph. https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/pull/43
-
由 Jonathan Kew 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
If pre-base reordering Ra is NOT formed (or formed and then broken up), we should consider that Ra as base. This is observable when there's a left matra or dotreph that positions before base. Now, it might be that we shouldn't do this if the Ra happend to form a below form. We can't quite deduce that right now... Micro test added. Also at: https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=186#c29
-
- 10 6月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Sometimes font designers form half/pref/etc consonant forms unconditionally and then undo that conditionally. Try to recover the OT_H classification in those cases. No test number changes expected.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
No test numbers change.
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Previous commit was not compiling with clang.
-
- 07 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
As in building for Android / iPhone. Only set it if struct{char} alignment is not 1. NOT tested on an actual Arm architecture. Guess we'll know when this makes it to people's build bots.
-
- 06 6月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
Normally if you want to, say, conditionally prevent a 'pref', you would use blocking contextual matching. Some designers instead form the 'pref' form, then undo it in context. To detect that we now also remember glyphs that went through MultipleSubst. In the only place that this is used, Uniscribe seems to only care about the "last" transformation between Ligature and Multiple substitions. Ie. if you ligate, expand, and ligate again, it moves the pref, but if you ligate and expand it doesn't. That's why we clear the MULTIPLIED bit when setting LIGATED. Micro-test added. Test: U+0D2F,0D4D,0D30 with font from: [1] https://code.google.com/a/google.com/p/noto-alpha/issues/detail?id=186#c29
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
- 05 6月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-
由 Behdad Esfahbod 提交于
-