Unicode 6.2.0 Section 16.2 / Figure 16.3 says:

"For backward compatibility, between Arabic characters a ZWJ acts just
like the sequence <ZWJ, ZWNJ, ZWJ>, preventing a ligature from forming
instead of requesting the use of a ligature that would not normally be
used. As a result, there is no plain text mechanism for requesting the
use of a ligature in Arabic text."

As such, we flip internal zwj to zwnj flags for GSUB matching, which
means it will block ligation in all features, unless the font
explicitly matches U+200D glyph.  This doesn't affect joining behavior.

If there's a mark ligating forward with non-mark, they were
inheriting the GC of the mark and later get advance-zeroed.
Don't do that if there's any non-mark glyph in the ligature.

Sample test: U+1780,U+17D2,U+179F with Kh-Metal-Chrieng.ttf

Also:
Bug 58922 - Issue with mark advance zeroing in generic shaper

After the Ngapi hackfest work, we were assuming that fonts
won't use presentation features to choose specific forms
(eg. conjuncts).  As such, we were using auto-joiner behavior
for such features.  It proved to be troublesome as many fonts
used presentation forms ('pres') for example to form conjuncts,
which need to be disabled when a ZWJ is inserted.

Two examples:

	U+0D2F,U+200D,U+0D4D,U+0D2F with kartika.ttf
	U+0995,U+09CD,U+200D,U+09B7 with vrinda.ttf

What we do now is to never do magic to ZWJ during GSUB's main input
match for Indic-style shapers.  Note that backtrack/lookahead are still
matched liberally, as is GPOS.  This seems to be an acceptable
compromise.

As to the bug that initially started this work, that one needs to
be fixed differently:

  Bug 58714 - Kannada u+0cb0 u+200d u+0ccd u+0c95 u+0cbe does not
  provide same results as Windows8
  https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58714

New numbers:

BENGALI: 353689 out of 354188 tests passed. 499 failed (0.140886%)
DEVANAGARI: 707305 out of 707394 tests passed. 89 failed (0.0125814%)
GUJARATI: 366349 out of 366457 tests passed. 108 failed (0.0294714%)
GURMUKHI: 60706 out of 60747 tests passed. 41 failed (0.067493%)
KANNADA: 951030 out of 951913 tests passed. 883 failed (0.0927606%)
KHMER: 299070 out of 299124 tests passed. 54 failed (0.0180527%)
LAO: 53611 out of 53644 tests passed. 33 failed (0.0615167%)
MALAYALAM: 1048102 out of 1048334 tests passed. 232 failed (0.0221304%)
ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
SINHALA: 271666 out of 271847 tests passed. 181 failed (0.0665816%)
TAMIL: 1091753 out of 1091754 tests passed. 1 failed (9.15957e-05%)
TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
TIBETAN: 208469 out of 208469 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)

Not for Arabic, but for Indic-like scripts.  ZWJ/ZWNJ have special
meanings in those scripts, so let font lookups take full control.

This undoes the regression caused by automatic-joiners handling
introduced two commits ago.

We only disable automatic joiner handling for the "basic shaping
features" of Indic, Myanmar, and SEAsian shapers.  The "presentation
forms" and other features are still applied with automatic-joiner
handling.

This change also changes the test suite failure statistics, such that
a few scripts show more "failures".  The most affected is Kannada.
However, upon inspection, we believe that in most, if not all, of the
new failures, we are producing results superior to Uniscribe.  Hard to
count those!

Here's an example of what is fixed by the recent joiner-handling
changes:

  https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58714

New numbers, for future reference:

BENGALI: 353892 out of 354188 tests passed. 296 failed (0.0835714%)
DEVANAGARI: 707336 out of 707394 tests passed. 58 failed (0.00819911%)
GUJARATI: 366262 out of 366457 tests passed. 195 failed (0.0532122%)
GURMUKHI: 60706 out of 60747 tests passed. 41 failed (0.067493%)
KANNADA: 950680 out of 951913 tests passed. 1233 failed (0.129529%)
KHMER: 299074 out of 299124 tests passed. 50 failed (0.0167155%)
LAO: 53611 out of 53644 tests passed. 33 failed (0.0615167%)
MALAYALAM: 1047983 out of 1048334 tests passed. 351 failed (0.0334817%)
ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
SINHALA: 271539 out of 271847 tests passed. 308 failed (0.113299%)
TAMIL: 1091753 out of 1091754 tests passed. 1 failed (9.15957e-05%)
TELUGU: 970555 out of 970573 tests passed. 18 failed (0.00185457%)
TIBETAN: 208469 out of 208469 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)

Not used yet.  Next commit...

When matching lookups, be smart about default-ignorable characters.
In particular:

Do nothing specific about ZWNJ, but for the other default-ignorables:

If the lookup in question uses the ignorable character in a sequence,
then match it as we used to do.  However, if the sequence match will
fail because the default-ignorable blocked it, try skipping the
ignorable character and continue.

The most immediate thing it means is that if Lam-Alef forms a ligature,
then Lam-ZWJ-Alef will do to.  Finally!

One exception: when matching for GPOS, or for backtrack/lookahead of
GSUB, we ignore ZWNJ too.  That's the right thing to do.

It certainly is possible to build fonts that this feature will result
in undesirable glyphs, but it's hard to think of a real-world case
that that would happen.

This *does* break Indic shaping right now, since Indic Unicode has
specific rules for what ZWJ/ZWNJ mean, and skipping ZWJ is breaking
those rules.  That will be fixed in upcoming commits.

Before, we were zeroing advance width of attached marks for
non-Indic scripts, and not doing it for Indic.

We have now three different behaviors, which seem to better
reflect what Uniscribe is doing:

  - For Indic, no explicit zeroing happens whatsoever, which
    is the same as before,

  - For Myanmar, zero advance width of glyphs marked as marks
    *in GDEF*, and do that *before* applying GPOS.  This seems
    to be what the new Win8 Myanmar shaper does,

  - For everything else, zero advance width of glyphs that are
    from General_Category=Mn Unicode characters, and do so
    before applying GPOS.  This seems to be what Uniscribe does
    for Latin at least.

With these changes, positioning of all tests matches for Myanmar,
except for the glitch in Uniscribe not applying 'mark'.  See preivous
commit.

API additions:

	hb_segment_properties_t
	HB_SEGMENT_PROPERTIES_DEFAULT
	hb_segment_properties_equal()
	hb_segment_properties_hash()

	hb_buffer_set_segment_properties()
	hb_buffer_get_segment_properties()

	hb_ot_layout_glyph_class_t

	hb_shape_plan_t
	hb_shape_plan_create()
	hb_shape_plan_create_cached()
	hb_shape_plan_get_empty()
	hb_shape_plan_reference()
	hb_shape_plan_destroy()
	hb_shape_plan_set_user_data()
	hb_shape_plan_get_user_data()
	hb_shape_plan_execute()

	hb_ot_shape_plan_collect_lookups()

API changes:

	Rename hb_ot_layout_feature_get_lookup_indexes() to
	hb_ot_layout_feature_get_lookups().

New header file:

	hb-shape-plan.h

And a bunch of prototyped but not implemented stuff.  Coming soon.
(Tests fail because of the prototypes right now.)

To match upcoming API.

Avoids USHORT, SHORT, ULONG, LONG clashes with Windows API.

To be used in the next patch.

To room for more allocations, coming.

We need the font for glyph lookup during GSUB pauses in Indic shaper.
Could perhaps be avoided, but at this point, we don't mean to support
separate substitute()/position() entry points (anymore), so there is
no point in not providing the font to GSUB.

It was impossible to meaningfully use them from the outside these days.

Gives me a good 10% speedup for the Devanagari test case.  Less so
for less lookup-intensive tests.

For the Devanagari test case, the false positive rate of the GSUB digest
is 4%.

See comments.

Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437633

Start squeezing more out of lig_id/lig_comp.

This commit: a3313e54 broke MarkMarkPos
when one of the marks itself is a ligature.  That regressed 26 Tibetan
tests (up from zero!).  Fix that.  Tibetan back to zero.

This was broken as a result of 7b84c536.
As Khaled reported, MarkMark positioning was broken with glyphs
resulting from a MultipleSubst.  Fixed.  Test with the ALLAH character
in Amiri.

This is to incorporate it into GSUB/GPOS processing.