Restructure code to make SMB2 vs. SMB3 signing a protocol
specific op.  SMB3 signing (AES_CMAC) is not enabled yet,
but this restructuring at least makes sure we don't send
an smb2 signature on an smb3 signed connection. A followon
patch will add AES_CMAC and enable smb3 signing.
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>

This patch enables optional for original SMB2 (SMB2.02) dialect
by specifying vers=2.0 on mount.
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

because the is no difference here. This also adds support of prefixpath
mount option for SMB2.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Based on whether the user (on mount command) chooses:

vers=3.0 (for smb3.0 support)
vers=2.1 (for smb2.1 support)
or (with subsequent patch, which will allow SMB2 support)
vers=2.0 (for original smb2.02 dialect support)

send only one dialect at a time during negotiate (we
had been sending a list).
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Some trivial endian fixes for the SMB2 code. One
warning remains which I asked Pavel to look at.
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

if server supports them and we need oplocks.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>

Now that we aren't abusing the kmap address space, there's no need for
this lock or to impose a limit on the rsize.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

Now that we're not kmapping so much at once, there's no need to cap
the wsize at the amount that can be simultaneously kmapped.
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Since both CIFS and SMB2 use ses->capabilities (server->capabilities)
field but flags are different we should make such checks protocol
independent.
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Since there are only 19 command codes, it also is easier to track by exact
command code than it was for cifs.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

that needs for a successful mount through SMB2 protocol.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>