- 02 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we have a read oplock and set a read lock in it, we can't write to the locked area - so, filemap_fdatawrite may fail with a no information for a userspace application even if we request a write to non-locked area. Fix this by writing directly to the server and then breaking oplock level from level2 to None. Also remove CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2 ifdefs because it's suitable for both CIFS and SMB2 protocols. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
that solution has data races and can end up two identical writes to the server: when clientCanCacheAll value can be changed during the execution of __generic_file_aio_write. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 31 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
When a call goes out, the signing code adjusts the sequence number upward by two to account for the request and the response. An NT_CANCEL however doesn't get a response of its own, it just hurries the server along to get it to respond to the original request more quickly. Therefore, we must adjust the sequence number back down by one after signing a NT_CANCEL request. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-by: NTim Perry <tdparmor-sambabugs@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Cai reported this oops: [90701.616664] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028 [90701.625438] IP: [<ffffffff814a343e>] kernel_setsockopt+0x2e/0x60 [90701.632167] PGD fea319067 PUD 103fda4067 PMD 0 [90701.637255] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [90701.640878] Modules linked in: des_generic md4 nls_utf8 cifs dns_resolver binfmt_misc tun sg igb iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support lpc_ich pcspkr i2c_i801 i2c_core i7core_edac edac_core ioatdma dca mfd_core coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel microcode sr_mod cdrom ata_generic sd_mod pata_acpi crc_t10dif ata_piix libata megaraid_sas dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [90701.677655] CPU 10 [90701.679808] Pid: 9627, comm: ls Tainted: G W 3.7.1+ #10 QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R [90701.688950] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff814a343e>] [<ffffffff814a343e>] kernel_setsockopt+0x2e/0x60 [90701.698383] RSP: 0018:ffff88177b431bb8 EFLAGS: 00010206 [90701.704309] RAX: ffff88177b431fd8 RBX: 00007ffffffff000 RCX: ffff88177b431bec [90701.712271] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI: 0000000000000000 [90701.720223] RBP: ffff88177b431bc8 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000 [90701.728185] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 [90701.736147] R13: ffff88184ef92000 R14: 0000000000000023 R15: ffff88177b431c88 [90701.744109] FS: 00007fd56a1a47c0(0000) GS:ffff88105fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [90701.753137] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [90701.759550] CR2: 0000000000000028 CR3: 000000104f15f000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 [90701.767512] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [90701.775465] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [90701.783428] Process ls (pid: 9627, threadinfo ffff88177b430000, task ffff88185ca4cb60) [90701.792261] Stack: [90701.794505] 0000000000000023 ffff88177b431c50 ffff88177b431c38 ffffffffa014fcb1 [90701.802809] ffff88184ef921bc 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff ffff88184ef921c0 [90701.811123] ffff88177b431c08 ffffffff815ca3d9 ffff88177b431c18 ffff880857758000 [90701.819433] Call Trace: [90701.822183] [<ffffffffa014fcb1>] smb_send_rqst+0x71/0x1f0 [cifs] [90701.828991] [<ffffffff815ca3d9>] ? schedule+0x29/0x70 [90701.834736] [<ffffffffa014fe6d>] smb_sendv+0x3d/0x40 [cifs] [90701.841062] [<ffffffffa014fe96>] smb_send+0x26/0x30 [cifs] [90701.847291] [<ffffffffa015801f>] send_nt_cancel+0x6f/0xd0 [cifs] [90701.854102] [<ffffffffa015075e>] SendReceive+0x18e/0x360 [cifs] [90701.860814] [<ffffffffa0134a78>] CIFSFindFirst+0x1a8/0x3f0 [cifs] [90701.867724] [<ffffffffa013f731>] ? build_path_from_dentry+0xf1/0x260 [cifs] [90701.875601] [<ffffffffa013f731>] ? build_path_from_dentry+0xf1/0x260 [cifs] [90701.883477] [<ffffffffa01578e6>] cifs_query_dir_first+0x26/0x30 [cifs] [90701.890869] [<ffffffffa015480d>] initiate_cifs_search+0xed/0x250 [cifs] [90701.898354] [<ffffffff81195970>] ? fillonedir+0x100/0x100 [90701.904486] [<ffffffffa01554cb>] cifs_readdir+0x45b/0x8f0 [cifs] [90701.911288] [<ffffffff81195970>] ? fillonedir+0x100/0x100 [90701.917410] [<ffffffff81195970>] ? fillonedir+0x100/0x100 [90701.923533] [<ffffffff81195970>] ? fillonedir+0x100/0x100 [90701.929657] [<ffffffff81195848>] vfs_readdir+0xb8/0xe0 [90701.935490] [<ffffffff81195b9f>] sys_getdents+0x8f/0x110 [90701.941521] [<ffffffff815d3b99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [90701.948222] Code: 66 90 55 65 48 8b 04 25 f0 c6 00 00 48 89 e5 53 48 83 ec 08 83 fe 01 48 8b 98 48 e0 ff ff 48 c7 80 48 e0 ff ff ff ff ff ff 74 22 <48> 8b 47 28 ff 50 68 65 48 8b 14 25 f0 c6 00 00 48 89 9a 48 e0 [90701.970313] RIP [<ffffffff814a343e>] kernel_setsockopt+0x2e/0x60 [90701.977125] RSP <ffff88177b431bb8> [90701.981018] CR2: 0000000000000028 [90701.984809] ---[ end trace 24bd602971110a43 ]--- This is likely due to a race vs. a reconnection event. The current code checks for a NULL socket in smb_send_kvec, but that's too late. By the time that check is done, the socket will already have been passed to kernel_setsockopt. Move the check into smb_send_rqst, so that it's checked earlier. In truth, this is a bit of a half-assed fix. The -ENOTSOCK error return here looks like it could bubble back up to userspace. The locking rules around the ssocket pointer are really unclear as well. There are cases where the ssocket pointer is changed without holding the srv_mutex, but I'm not clear whether there's a potential race here yet or not. This code seems like it could benefit from some fundamental re-think of how the socket handling should behave. Until then though, this patch should at least fix the above oops in most cases. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.7+ Reported-and-Tested-by: NCAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 26 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
With user namespaces enabled building f2fs fails with: CC fs/f2fs/acl.o fs/f2fs/acl.c: In function ‘f2fs_acl_from_disk’: fs/f2fs/acl.c:85:21: error: ‘struct posix_acl_entry’ has no member named ‘e_id’ make[2]: *** [fs/f2fs/acl.o] Error 1 make[2]: Target `__build' not remade because of errors. e_id is a backwards compatibility field only used for file systems that haven't been converted to use kuids and kgids. When the posix acl tag field is neither ACL_USER nor ACL_GROUP assigning e_id is unnecessary. Remove the assignment so f2fs will build with user namespaces enabled. Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Cc: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com> Acked-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
While testing the pid namespace code I hit this nasty warning. [ 176.262617] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 176.263388] WARNING: at /home/eric/projects/linux/linux-userns-devel/kernel/softirq.c:160 local_bh_enable_ip+0x7a/0xa0() [ 176.265145] Hardware name: Bochs [ 176.265677] Modules linked in: [ 176.266341] Pid: 742, comm: bash Not tainted 3.7.0userns+ #18 [ 176.266564] Call Trace: [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810a539f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810a53fa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810ad9ea>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x7a/0xa0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff819308c9>] _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x19/0x20 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8123dbda>] proc_free_inum+0x3a/0x50 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8111d0dc>] free_pid_ns+0x1c/0x80 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8111d195>] put_pid_ns+0x35/0x50 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810c608a>] put_pid+0x4a/0x60 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff8146b177>] tty_ioctl+0x717/0xc10 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810aa4d5>] ? wait_consider_task+0x855/0xb90 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff81086bf9>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810cab0a>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x5a/0x70 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff811e37e8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x98/0x550 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810b8a0f>] ? recalc_sigpending+0x1f/0x60 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810b9127>] ? __set_task_blocked+0x37/0x80 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810ab95b>] ? sys_wait4+0xab/0xf0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff811e3d31>] sys_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff810a95f0>] ? task_stopped_code+0x50/0x50 [ 176.266564] [<ffffffff81939199>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 176.266564] ---[ end trace 387af88219ad6143 ]--- It turns out that spin_unlock_bh(proc_inum_lock) is not safe when put_pid is called with another spinlock held and irqs disabled. For now take the easy path and use spin_lock_irqsave(proc_inum_lock) in proc_free_inum and spin_loc_irq in proc_alloc_inum(proc_inum_lock). Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This reverts commit 79f77bf9. This is obviously wrong, and I have no idea how I missed seeing the warning in testing: I must just not have looked at the right logs. The caller bumps rq_resused/rq_next_page, so it will always be hit on a large enough read. Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The fscache code will currently bleat a "non-unique superblock keys" warning even if the user is mounting without the 'fsc' option. There should be no reason to even initialise the superblock cache cookie unless we're planning on using fscache for something, so ensure that we check for the NFS_OPTION_FSCACHE flag before calling into the fscache code. Reported-by: NPaweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@agmk.net> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Provide a stub nfs_fscache_wait_on_invalidate() function for when CONFIG_NFS_FSCACHE=n lest the following error appear: fs/nfs/inode.c: In function 'nfs_invalidate_mapping': fs/nfs/inode.c:887:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'nfs_fscache_wait_on_invalidate' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] cc1: some warnings being treated as errors Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Reported-by: NVineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> Reported-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 12月, 2012 31 次提交
-
-
由 Scott Wolchok 提交于
do_sendfile() in fs/read_write.c does not call the fsnotify functions, unlike its neighbors. This manifests as a lack of inotify ACCESS events when a file is sent using sendfile(2). Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12812 [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use fsnotify_modify(out.file), not fsnotify_access(), per Dave] Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Scott Wolchok <swolchok@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ravishankar N 提交于
fat_search_long() returns 0 on success, -ENOENT/ENOMEM on failure. Change the function comment accordingly. While at it, fix some trivial typos. Signed-off-by: NRavishankar N <cyberax82@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com> Acked-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xiaotian Feng 提交于
Lockdep found an inconsistent lock state when rcu is processing delayed work in softirq. Currently, kernel is using spin_lock/spin_unlock to protect proc_inum_ida, but proc_free_inum is called by rcu in softirq context. Use spin_lock_bh/spin_unlock_bh fix following lockdep warning. ================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 3.7.0 #36 Not tainted --------------------------------- inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. swapper/1/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: (proc_inum_lock){+.?...}, at: proc_free_inum+0x1c/0x50 {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: __lock_acquire+0x8ae/0xca0 lock_acquire+0x199/0x200 _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50 proc_alloc_inum+0x4c/0xd0 alloc_mnt_ns+0x49/0xc0 create_mnt_ns+0x25/0x70 mnt_init+0x161/0x1c7 vfs_caches_init+0x107/0x11a start_kernel+0x348/0x38c x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x136 x86_64_start_kernel+0x103/0x112 irq event stamp: 2993422 hardirqs last enabled at (2993422): _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x55/0x80 hardirqs last disabled at (2993421): _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x29/0x70 softirqs last enabled at (2993394): _local_bh_enable+0x13/0x20 softirqs last disabled at (2993395): call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(proc_inum_lock); <Interrupt> lock(proc_inum_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** no locks held by swapper/1/0. stack backtrace: Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.7.0 #36 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff810a40f1>] ? vprintk_emit+0x471/0x510 print_usage_bug+0x2a5/0x2c0 mark_lock+0x33b/0x5e0 __lock_acquire+0x813/0xca0 lock_acquire+0x199/0x200 _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50 proc_free_inum+0x1c/0x50 free_pid_ns+0x1c/0x50 put_pid_ns+0x2e/0x50 put_pid+0x4a/0x60 delayed_put_pid+0x12/0x20 rcu_process_callbacks+0x462/0x790 __do_softirq+0x1b4/0x3b0 call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 do_softirq+0x59/0xd0 irq_exit+0x54/0xd0 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x95/0xa3 apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80 cpuidle_enter_tk+0x10/0x20 cpuidle_enter_state+0x17/0x50 cpuidle_idle_call+0x287/0x520 cpu_idle+0xba/0x130 start_secondary+0x2b3/0x2bc Signed-off-by: NXiaotian Feng <dannyfeng@tencent.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Vyacheslav Dubeyko 提交于
Add an error message for the case of failure of sync fs in delayed_sync_fs() method. Signed-off-by: NVyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Vyacheslav Dubeyko 提交于
Add to hfs_btree_write() a return of -EIO on failure of b-tree node searching. Also add logic ofor processing errors from hfs_btree_write() in hfsplus_system_write_inode() with a message about b-tree writing failure. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: reduce scope of `err', print errno on error] Signed-off-by: NVyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NHin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Vyacheslav Dubeyko 提交于
Currently, it doesn't process error codes from the hfsplus_block_free() call in hfsplus_free_extents() method. Add some error code processing. Signed-off-by: NVyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
If the read fails we kmap an error code. This doesn't end well. Instead print a critical error and pray. This mirrors the rest of the fs behaviour with critical error cases. Acked-by: NVyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NHin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
If a series of scripts are executed, each triggering module loading via unprintable bytes in the script header, kernel stack contents can leak into the command line. Normally execution of binfmt_script and binfmt_misc happens recursively. However, when modules are enabled, and unprintable bytes exist in the bprm->buf, execution will restart after attempting to load matching binfmt modules. Unfortunately, the logic in binfmt_script and binfmt_misc does not expect to get restarted. They leave bprm->interp pointing to their local stack. This means on restart bprm->interp is left pointing into unused stack memory which can then be copied into the userspace argv areas. After additional study, it seems that both recursion and restart remains the desirable way to handle exec with scripts, misc, and modules. As such, we need to protect the changes to interp. This changes the logic to require allocation for any changes to the bprm->interp. To avoid adding a new kmalloc to every exec, the default value is left as-is. Only when passing through binfmt_script or binfmt_misc does an allocation take place. For a proof of concept, see DoTest.sh from: http://www.halfdog.net/Security/2012/LinuxKernelBinfmtScriptStackDataDisclosure/Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: halfdog <me@halfdog.net> Cc: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Clearly, we can't handle the NULL filename case, but we can deal with the case where there's a real pathname. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...as always, rename is the messiest of the bunch. We have to track whether to retry or not via a separate flag since the error handling is already quite complex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...so we can pass in LOOKUP_REVAL. For now, nothing does yet. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-