- 09 4月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Optimize the space and leave plenty of room for further flags. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> [ rjw: Do not use __this_cpu_read() to access tick_stopped and add got_idle_tick to avoid overloading inidle ] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If the tick isn't stopped, the target residency of the state selected by the menu governor may be greater than the actual time to the next tick and that means lost energy. To avoid that, make tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() return the current time to the next event (before stopping the tick) in addition to the estimated one via an extra pointer argument and make menu_select() use that value to refine the state selection when necessary. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order to address the issue with short idle duration predictions by the idle governor after the scheduler tick has been stopped, reorder the code in cpuidle_idle_call() so that the governor idle state selection runs before tick_nohz_idle_go_idle() and use the "nohz" hint returned by cpuidle_select() to decide whether or not to stop the tick. This isn't straightforward, because menu_select() invokes tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() to get the time to the next timer event and the number returned by the latter comes from __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(). Fortunately, however, it is possible to compute that number without actually stopping the tick and with the help of the existing code. Namely, tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() can be made call tick_nohz_next_event(), introduced earlier, to get the time to the next non-highres timer event. If that happens, tick_nohz_next_event() need not be called by __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() again. If it turns out that the scheduler tick cannot be stopped going forward or the next timer event is too close for the tick to be stopped, tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() can simply return the time to the next event currently programmed into the corresponding clock event device. In addition to knowing the return value of tick_nohz_next_event(), however, tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() needs to know the time to the next highres timer event, but with the scheduler tick timer excluded, which can be computed with the help of hrtimer_get_next_event(). That minimum of that number and the tick_nohz_next_event() return value is the total time to the next timer event with the assumption that the tick will be stopped. It can be returned to the idle governor which can use it for predicting idle duration (under the assumption that the tick will be stopped) and deciding whether or not it makes sense to stop the tick before putting the CPU into the selected idle state. With the above, the sleep_length field in struct tick_sched is not necessary any more, so drop it. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199227Reported-by: NDoug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> Reported-by: NThomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
-
- 08 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order to address the issue with short idle duration predictions by the idle governor after the scheduler tick has been stopped, split tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() into two separate routines, one computing the time to the next timer event and the other simply stopping the tick when the time to the next timer event is known. Prepare these two routines to be called separately, as one of them will be called by the idle governor in the cpuidle_select() code path after subsequent changes. Update the former callers of tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() to use the new routines, tick_nohz_next_event() and tick_nohz_stop_tick(), instead of it and move the updates of the sleep_length field in struct tick_sched into __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() as it doesn't need to be updated anywhere else. There should be no intentional visible changes in functionality resulting from this change. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
-
- 06 4月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add a new pointer argument to cpuidle_select() and to the ->select cpuidle governor callback to allow a boolean value indicating whether or not the tick should be stopped before entering the selected state to be returned from there. Make the ladder governor ignore that pointer (to preserve its current behavior) and make the menu governor return 'false" through it if: (1) the idle exit latency is constrained at 0, or (2) the selected state is a polling one, or (3) the expected idle period duration is within the tick period range. In addition to that, the correction factor computations in the menu governor need to take the possibility that the tick may not be stopped into account to avoid artificially small correction factor values. To that end, add a mechanism to record tick wakeups, as suggested by Peter Zijlstra, and use it to modify the menu_update() behavior when tick wakeup occurs. Namely, if the CPU is woken up by the tick and the return value of tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() is not within the tick boundary, the predicted idle duration is likely too short, so make menu_update() try to compensate for that by updating the governor statistics as though the CPU was idle for a long time. Since the value returned through the new argument pointer of cpuidle_select() is not used by its caller yet, this change by itself is not expected to alter the functionality of the code. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> -
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Push the decision whether or not to stop the tick somewhat deeper into the idle loop. Stopping the tick upfront leads to unpleasant outcomes in case the idle governor doesn't agree with the nohz code on the duration of the upcoming idle period. Specifically, if the tick has been stopped and the idle governor predicts short idle, the situation is bad regardless of whether or not the prediction is accurate. If it is accurate, the tick has been stopped unnecessarily which means excessive overhead. If it is not accurate, the CPU is likely to spend too much time in the (shallow, because short idle has been predicted) idle state selected by the governor [1]. As the first step towards addressing this problem, change the code to make the tick stopping decision inside of the loop in do_idle(). In particular, do not stop the tick in the cpu_idle_poll() code path. Also don't do that in tick_nohz_irq_exit() which doesn't really have enough information on whether or not to stop the tick. Link: https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=150116085925208&w=2 # [1] Link: https://tu-dresden.de/zih/forschung/ressourcen/dateien/projekte/haec/powernightmares.pdfSuggested-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Prepare the scheduler tick code for reworking the idle loop to avoid stopping the tick in some cases. The idea is to split the nohz idle entry call to decouple the idle time stats accounting and preparatory work from the actual tick stop code, in order to later be able to delay the tick stop once we reach more power-knowledgeable callers. Move away the tick_nohz_start_idle() invocation from __tick_nohz_idle_enter(), rename the latter to __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() and define tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() as a wrapper around it for calling it from the outside. Make tick_nohz_idle_enter() only call tick_nohz_start_idle() instead of calling the entire __tick_nohz_idle_enter(), add another wrapper disabling and enabling interrupts around tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() and make the current callers of tick_nohz_idle_enter() call it too to retain their current functionality. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-
- 09 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The primary observation is that nohz enter/exit is always from the current CPU, therefore NOHZ_TICK_STOPPED does not in fact need to be an atomic. Secondary is that we appear to have 2 nearly identical hooks in the nohz enter code, set_cpu_sd_state_idle() and nohz_balance_enter_idle(). Fold the whole set_cpu_sd_state thing into nohz_balance_{enter,exit}_idle. Removes an atomic op from both enter and exit paths. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Now that the 1Hz tick is offloaded to workqueues, we can safely remove the residual code that used to handle it locally. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519186649-3242-7-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
This check is racy but provides a good heuristic to determine whether a CPU may need a remote tick or not. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519186649-3242-4-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
It makes this function more self-explanatory about what it does and how to use it. Reported-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519186649-3242-3-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 16 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit 6f1982fe ("sched/isolation: Handle the nohz_full= parameter") broke CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=y kernels. This breakage is due to the code under CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL failing to invoke the shiny new housekeeping functions. This means that rcutorture scenario TREE04 now emits RCU CPU stall warnings due to the RCU grace-period kthreads not being awakened at a time of their choosing, or perhaps even not at all: [ 27.731422] rcu_bh kthread starved for 21001 jiffies! g18446744073709551369 c18446744073709551368 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(3) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=3 [ 27.731423] rcu_bh I14936 9 2 0x80080000 [ 27.731435] Call Trace: [ 27.731440] __schedule+0x31a/0x6d0 [ 27.731442] schedule+0x31/0x80 [ 27.731446] schedule_timeout+0x15a/0x320 [ 27.731453] ? call_timer_fn+0x130/0x130 [ 27.731457] rcu_gp_kthread+0x66c/0xea0 [ 27.731458] ? rcu_gp_kthread+0x66c/0xea0 Because no one has complained about CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=y being broken, I hypothesize that no one is in fact using it, other than rcutorture. This commit therefore eliminates CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL and updates rcutorture's config files to instead use the nohz_full= kernel parameter to put the desired CPUs into nohz_full mode. Fixes: 6f1982fe ("sched/isolation: Handle the nohz_full= parameter") Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-
- 16 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The hrtimer_cpu_base::migration_enable and ::nohz_active fields were originally introduced to avoid accessing global variables for these decisions. Still that results in a (cache hot) load and conditional branch, which can be avoided by using static keys. Implement it with static keys and optimize for the most critical case of high performance networking which tends to disable the timer migration functionality. No change in functionality. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: keescook@chromium.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1801142327490.2371@nanos Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171221104205.7269-2-anna-maria@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 30 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The conditions in irq_exit() to invoke tick_nohz_irq_exit() which subsequently invokes tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() are: if ((idle_cpu(cpu) && !need_resched()) || tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu)) If need_resched() is not set, but a timer softirq is pending then this is an indication that the softirq code punted and delegated the execution to softirqd. need_resched() is not true because the current interrupted task takes precedence over softirqd. Invoking tick_nohz_irq_exit() in this case can cause an endless loop of timer interrupts because the timer wheel contains an expired timer, but softirqs are not yet executed. So it returns an immediate expiry request, which causes the timer to fire immediately again. Lather, rinse and repeat.... Prevent that by adding a check for a pending timer soft interrupt to the conditions in tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() which avoid calling get_next_timer_interrupt(). That keeps the tick sched timer on the tick and prevents a repetitive programming of an already expired timer. Reported-by: NSebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.d> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1712272156050.2431@nanos
-
- 28 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Fernandes 提交于
Since the recent remote cpufreq callback work, its possible that a cpufreq update is triggered from a remote CPU. For single policies however, the current code uses the local CPU when trying to determine if the remote sg_cpu entered idle or is busy. This is incorrect. To remedy this, compare with the nohz tick idle_calls counter of the remote CPU. Fixes: 674e7541 (sched: cpufreq: Allow remote cpufreq callbacks) Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJoel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 08 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Use lockdep to check that IRQs are enabled or disabled as expected. This way the sanity check only shows overhead when concurrency correctness debug code is enabled. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509980490-4285-5-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 27 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
We want to centralize the isolation management, done by the housekeeping subsystem. Therefore we need to handle the nohz_full= parameter from there. Since nohz_full= so far has involved unbound timers, watchdog, RCU and tilegx NAPI isolation, we keep that default behaviour. nohz_full= will be deprecated in the future. We want to control the isolation features from the isolcpus= parameter. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509072159-31808-10-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
The housekeeping code is currently tied to the NOHZ code. As we are planning to make housekeeping independent from it, start with moving the relevant code to its own file. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509072159-31808-2-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 10 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
quiet_vmstat() is an expensive function that only makes sense when we go into NOHZ. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: aubrey.li@linux.intel.com Cc: cl@linux.com Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 22 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
The idle load balancing registration path assumes that we only stop the tick when the CPU is idle, ignoring the nohz full case. As a result, a nohz full CPU that is running a task may be chosen to perform idle load balancing. Lets make sure that only CPUs in dynticks idle mode can be picked as idle load balancers. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1497838322-10913-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
The loadavg naming code still assumes that nohz == idle whereas its code is actually handling well both nohz idle and nohz full. So lets fix the naming according to what the code actually does, to unconfuse the reader. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1497838322-10913-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 13 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
The sanity check ensuring that the tick expiry cache (ts->next_tick) is actually in sync with the hardware clock (dev->next_event) makes the wrong assumption that the clock can't be programmed later than the hrtimer deadline. In fact the clock hardware can be programmed later on some conditions such as: * The hrtimer deadline is already in the past. * The hrtimer deadline is earlier than the minimum delay supported by the hardware. Such conditions can be met when we program the tick, for example if the last jiffies update hasn't been seen by the current CPU yet, we may program the hrtimer to a deadline that is earlier than ktime_get() because last_jiffies_update is our timestamp base to compute the next tick. As a result, we can randomly observe such warning: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 0 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:794 tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick kernel/time/tick-sched.c:791 [inline] Call Trace: tick_nohz_irq_exit tick_irq_exit irq_exit exiting_irq smp_call_function_interrupt smp_call_function_single_interrupt call_function_single_interrupt Therefore, let's rather make sure that the tick expiry cache is sync'ed with the tick hrtimer deadline, against which it is not supposed to drift away. The clock hardware instead has its own will and can't be used as a reliable comparison point. Reported-and-tested-by: NSasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NAbdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: James Hartsock <hartsjc@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Wright <tim@binbash.co.uk> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1497326654-14122-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com [ Minor readability edit. ] Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 05 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
When the tick is stopped and we reach the dynticks evaluation code on IRQ exit, we perform a soft tick restart if we observe an expired timer from there. It means we program the nearest possible tick but we stay in dynticks mode (ts->tick_stopped = 1) because we may need to stop the tick again after that expired timer is handled. Now this solution works most of the time but if we suffer an IRQ storm and those interrupts trigger faster than the hardware clockevents min delay, our tick won't fire until that IRQ storm is finished. Here is the problem: on IRQ exit we reprog the timer to at least NOW() + min_clockevents_delay. Another IRQ fires before the tick so we reschedule again to NOW() + min_clockevents_delay, etc... The tick is eternally rescheduled min_clockevents_delay ahead. A solution is to simply remove this soft tick restart. After all the normal dynticks evaluation path can handle 0 delay just fine. And by doing that we benefit from the optimization branch which avoids clock reprogramming if the clockevents deadline hasn't changed since the last reprog. This fixes our issue because we don't do repetitive clock reprog that always add hardware min delay. As a side effect it should even optimize the 0 delay path in general. Reported-and-tested-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496328429-13317-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 31 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Handle tick interrupts whose regs are NULL, out of general paranoia. It happens when hrtimer_interrupt() is called from non-interrupt contexts, such as hotplug CPU down events. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 17 5月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
This restores commit: 24b91e36: ("nohz: Fix collision between tick and other hrtimers") ... which got reverted by commit: 558e8e27: ('Revert "nohz: Fix collision between tick and other hrtimers"') ... due to a regression where CPUs spuriously stopped ticking. The bug happened when a tick fired too early past its expected expiration: on IRQ exit the tick was scheduled again to the same deadline but skipped reprogramming because ts->next_tick still kept in cache the deadline. This has been fixed now with resetting ts->next_tick from the tick itself. Extra care has also been taken to prevent from obsolete values throughout CPU hotplug operations. When the tick is stopped and an interrupt occurs afterward, we check on that interrupt exit if the next tick needs to be rescheduled. If it doesn't need any update, we don't want to do anything. In order to check if the tick needs an update, we compare it against the clockevent device deadline. Now that's a problem because the clockevent device is at a lower level than the tick itself if it is implemented on top of hrtimer. Every hrtimer share this clockevent device. So comparing the next tick deadline against the clockevent device deadline is wrong because the device may be programmed for another hrtimer whose deadline collides with the tick. As a result we may end up not reprogramming the tick accidentally. In a worst case scenario under full dynticks mode, the tick stops firing as it is supposed to every 1hz, leaving /proc/stat stalled: Task in a full dynticks CPU ---------------------------- * hrtimer A is queued 2 seconds ahead * the tick is stopped, scheduled 1 second ahead * tick fires 1 second later * on tick exit, nohz schedules the tick 1 second ahead but sees the clockevent device is already programmed to that deadline, fooled by hrtimer A, the tick isn't rescheduled. * hrtimer A is cancelled before its deadline * tick never fires again until an interrupt happens... In order to fix this, store the next tick deadline to the tick_sched local structure and reuse that value later to check whether we need to reprogram the clock after an interrupt. On the other hand, ts->sleep_length still wants to know about the next clock event and not just the tick, so we want to improve the related comment to avoid confusion. Reported-and-tested-by: NTim Wright <tim@binbash.co.uk> Reported-and-tested-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Reported-by: NJames Hartsock <hartsjc@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1492783255-5051-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 15 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The argument to sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event() has not been used in a long time. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 23 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The way the schedutil governor uses the PELT metric causes it to underestimate the CPU utilization in some cases. That can be easily demonstrated by running kernel compilation on a Sandy Bridge Intel processor, running turbostat in parallel with it and looking at the values written to the MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL register. Namely, the expected result would be that when all CPUs were 100% busy, all of them would be requested to run in the maximum P-state, but observation shows that this clearly isn't the case. The CPUs run in the maximum P-state for a while and then are requested to run slower and go back to the maximum P-state after a while again. That causes the actual frequency of the processor to visibly oscillate below the sustainable maximum in a jittery fashion which clearly is not desirable. That has been attributed to CPU utilization metric updates on task migration that cause the total utilization value for the CPU to be reduced by the utilization of the migrated task. If that happens, the schedutil governor may see a CPU utilization reduction and will attempt to reduce the CPU frequency accordingly right away. That may be premature, though, for example if the system is generally busy and there are other runnable tasks waiting to be run on that CPU already. This is unlikely to be an issue on systems where cpufreq policies are shared between multiple CPUs, because in those cases the policy utilization is computed as the maximum of the CPU utilization values over the whole policy and if that turns out to be low, reducing the frequency for the policy most likely is a good idea anyway. On systems with one CPU per policy, however, it may affect performance adversely and even lead to increased energy consumption in some cases. On those systems it may be addressed by taking another utilization metric into consideration, like whether or not the CPU whose frequency is about to be reduced has been idle recently, because if that's not the case, the CPU is likely to be busy in the near future and its frequency should not be reduced. To that end, use the counter of idle calls in the timekeeping code. Namely, make the schedutil governor look at that counter for the current CPU every time before its frequency is about to be reduced. If the counter has not changed since the previous iteration of the governor computations for that CPU, the CPU has been busy for all that time and its frequency should not be decreased, so if the new frequency would be lower than the one set previously, the governor will skip the frequency update. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NJoel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
-
- 02 3月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
We are going to split <linux/sched/nohz.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/nohz.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
We are going to split <linux/sched/stat.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/stat.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
We are going to move softlockup APIs out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. <linux/nmi.h> already includes <linux/sched.h>. Include the <linux/nmi.h> header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
We are going to split <linux/sched/signal.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/signal.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
We are going to split <linux/sched/clock.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/clock.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 17 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit 24b91e36 and commit 7bdb59f1 ("tick/nohz: Fix possible missing clock reprog after tick soft restart") that depends on it, Pavel reports that it causes occasional boot hangs for him that seem to depend on just how the machine was booted. In particular, his machine hangs at around the PCI fixups of the EHCI USB host controller, but only hangs from cold boot, not from a warm boot. Thomas Gleixner suspecs it's a CPU hotplug interaction, particularly since Pavel also saw suspend/resume issues that seem to be related. We're reverting for now while trying to figure out the root cause. Reported-bisected-and-tested-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@kernel.org # reverted commits were marked for stable Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
ts->next_tick keeps track of the next tick deadline in order to optimize clock programmation on irq exit and avoid redundant clock device writes. Now if ts->next_tick missed an update, we may spuriously miss a clock reprog later as the nohz code is fooled by an obsolete next_tick value. This is what happens here on a specific path: when we observe an expired timer from the nohz update code on irq exit, we perform a soft tick restart which simply fires the closest possible tick without actually exiting the nohz mode and restoring a periodic state. But we forget to update ts->next_tick accordingly. As a result, after the next tick resulting from such soft tick restart, the nohz code sees a stale value on ts->next_tick which doesn't match the clock deadline that just expired. If that obsolete ts->next_tick value happens to collide with the actual next tick deadline to be scheduled, we may spuriously bypass the clock reprogramming. In the worst case, the tick may never fire again. Fix this with a ts->next_tick reset on soft tick restart. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Reviewed: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486485894-29173-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 11 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
When the tick is stopped and an interrupt occurs afterward, we check on that interrupt exit if the next tick needs to be rescheduled. If it doesn't need any update, we don't want to do anything. In order to check if the tick needs an update, we compare it against the clockevent device deadline. Now that's a problem because the clockevent device is at a lower level than the tick itself if it is implemented on top of hrtimer. Every hrtimer share this clockevent device. So comparing the next tick deadline against the clockevent device deadline is wrong because the device may be programmed for another hrtimer whose deadline collides with the tick. As a result we may end up not reprogramming the tick accidentally. In a worst case scenario under full dynticks mode, the tick stops firing as it is supposed to every 1hz, leaving /proc/stat stalled: Task in a full dynticks CPU ---------------------------- * hrtimer A is queued 2 seconds ahead * the tick is stopped, scheduled 1 second ahead * tick fires 1 second later * on tick exit, nohz schedules the tick 1 second ahead but sees the clockevent device is already programmed to that deadline, fooled by hrtimer A, the tick isn't rescheduled. * hrtimer A is cancelled before its deadline * tick never fires again until an interrupt happens... In order to fix this, store the next tick deadline to the tick_sched local structure and reuse that value later to check whether we need to reprogram the clock after an interrupt. On the other hand, ts->sleep_length still wants to know about the next clock event and not just the tick, so we want to improve the related comment to avoid confusion. Reported-by: NJames Hartsock <hartsjc@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483539124-5693-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 26 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
ktime is a union because the initial implementation stored the time in scalar nanoseconds on 64 bit machine and in a endianess optimized timespec variant for 32bit machines. The Y2038 cleanup removed the timespec variant and switched everything to scalar nanoseconds. The union remained, but become completely pointless. Get rid of the union and just keep ktime_t as simple typedef of type s64. The conversion was done with coccinelle and some manual mopping up. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
-
- 23 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
Install the callbacks via the state machine. Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: rt@linuxtronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161117183541.8588-14-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 13 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wanpeng Li 提交于
can_stop_full_tick() has no check for offline cpus. So it allows to stop the tick on an offline cpu from the interrupt return path, which is wrong and subsequently makes irq_work_needs_cpu() warn about being called for an offline cpu. Commit f7ea0fd6 ("tick: Don't invoke tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() if the cpu is offline") added prevention for can_stop_idle_tick(), but forgot to do the same in can_stop_full_tick(). Add it. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473245473-4463-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 02 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wanpeng Li 提交于
tick_nohz_start_idle() is prevented to be called if the idle tick can't be stopped since commit 1f3b0f82 ("tick/nohz: Optimize nohz idle enter"). As a result, after suspend/resume the host machine, full dynticks kvm guest will softlockup: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [swapper/0:0] Call Trace: default_idle+0x31/0x1a0 arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x20 default_idle_call+0x2a/0x50 cpu_startup_entry+0x39b/0x4d0 rest_init+0x138/0x140 ? rest_init+0x5/0x140 start_kernel+0x4c1/0x4ce ? set_init_arg+0x55/0x55 ? early_idt_handler_array+0x120/0x120 x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x26 x86_64_start_kernel+0x142/0x14f In addition, cat /proc/stat | grep cpu in guest or host: cpu 398 16 5049 15754 5490 0 1 46 0 0 cpu0 206 5 450 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 cpu1 81 0 3937 3149 1514 0 0 9 0 0 cpu2 45 6 332 6052 2243 0 0 11 0 0 cpu3 65 2 328 6552 1732 0 0 11 0 0 The idle and iowait states are weird 0 for cpu0(housekeeping). The bug is present in both guest and host kernels, and they both have cpu0's idle and iowait states issue, however, host kernel's suspend/resume path etc will touch watchdog to avoid the softlockup. - The watchdog will not be touched in tick_nohz_stop_idle path (need be touched since the scheduler stall is expected) if idle_active flags are not detected. - The idle and iowait states will not be accounted when exit idle loop (resched or interrupt) if idle start time and idle_active flags are not set. This patch fixes it by reverting commit 1f3b0f82 since can't stop idle tick doesn't mean can't be idle. Fixes: 1f3b0f82 ("tick/nohz: Optimize nohz idle enter") Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Sanjeev Yadav<sanjeev.yadav@spreadtrum.com> Cc: Gaurav Jindal<gaurav.jindal@spreadtrum.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472798303-4154-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-