1. 09 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: extended inode refs · f186373f
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      This patch adds basic support for extended inode refs. This includes support
      for link and unlink of the refs, which basically gets us support for rename
      as well.
      
      Inode creation does not need changing - extended refs are only added after
      the ref array is full.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
      f186373f
  2. 02 10月, 2012 4 次提交
  3. 29 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 10 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 27 6月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 21 6月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      Btrfs: don't assume to be on the correct extent in add_all_parents · 69bca40d
      Alexander Block 提交于
      add_all_parents did assume that path is already at a correct extent data
      item, which may not be true in case of data extents that were partly
      rewritten and splitted.
      
      We need to check if we're on a matching extent for every item and only
      for the ones after the first. The loop is changed to do this now.
      
      This patch also fixes a bug introduced with commit 3b127fd8 "Btrfs:
      remove obsolete btrfs_next_leaf call from __resolve_indirect_ref".
      The removal of next_leaf did sometimes result in slot==nritems when
      the above described case happens, and thus resulting in invalid values
      (e.g. wanted_obejctid) in add_all_parents (leading to missed backrefs
      or even crashes).
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      69bca40d
  8. 15 6月, 2012 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: add btrfs_next_old_leaf · 3d7806ec
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      To make sense of the tree mod log, the backref walker not only needs
      btrfs_search_old_slot, but it also called btrfs_next_leaf, which in turn was
      calling btrfs_search_slot. This obviously didn't give the correct result.
      
      This commit adds btrfs_next_old_leaf, a drop-in replacement for
      btrfs_next_leaf with a time_seq parameter. If it is zero, it behaves exactly
      like btrfs_next_leaf. If it is non-zero, it will use btrfs_search_old_slot
      with this time_seq parameter.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      3d7806ec
    • J
      Btrfs: remove obsolete btrfs_next_leaf call from __resolve_indirect_ref · f617e2fd
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      When resolving indirect refs, we used to call btrfs_next_leaf in case we
      didn't find an exact match. While we should find exact matches most of the
      time, in case we don't, we must continue searching. Treating those matches
      differently depending on the level we're searching doesn't make sense.
      
      Even worse, we might end up searching for a key larger than the largest, in
      which case there is no next_leaf and subsequent jobs would fail. This commit
      drops the bogous lines.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      f617e2fd
  9. 01 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 30 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 26 5月, 2012 4 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: look into the extent during find_all_leafs · 976b1908
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      Before this patch we called find_all_leafs for a data extent, then called
      find_all_roots and then looked into the extent to grab the information
      we were seeking. This was done without holding the leaves locked to avoid
      deadlocks. However, this can obviouly race with concurrent tree
      modifications.
      
      Instead, we now look into the extent while we're holding the lock during
      find_all_leafs and store this information together with the leaf list.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      976b1908
    • J
      Btrfs: bugfix: ignore the wrong key for indirect tree block backrefs · d5c88b73
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      The key we store with a tree block backref is only a hint. It is set when
      the ref is created and can remain correct for a long time. As the tree is
      rebalanced, however, eventually the key no longer points to the correct
      destination.
      
      With this patch, we change find_parent_nodes to no longer add keys unless it
      knows for sure they're correct (e.g. because they're for an extent data
      backref). Then when we later encounter a backref ref with no parent and no
      key set, we grab the block and take the first key from the block itself.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      d5c88b73
    • J
      Btrfs: bugfix in btrfs_find_parent_nodes · dadcaf78
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      That one has been around since the addition of backref.c. Due to the way we
      calculate our slot numbers, after adding inline refs we're missing one keyed
      ref unless it's located at the beginning of a new leaf.
      Reported-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      dadcaf78
    • J
      Btrfs: ulist realloc bugfix · cd1b413c
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      ulist_next gets the pointer to the previously returned element to find the
      next element from there. However, when we call ulist_add while iteration
      with ulist_next is in progress (ulist explicitly supports this), we can
      realloc the ulist internal memory, which makes the pointer to the previous
      element useless.
      
      Instead, we now use an iterator parameter that's independent from the
      internal pointers.
      Reported-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      cd1b413c
  12. 19 4月, 2012 3 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: add missing read locks in backref.c · b916a59a
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      iref_to_path and iterate_irefs both increment the eb's refcount to use it
      after releasing the path. Both depend on consistent data remaining in the
      extent buffer and need a read lock to protect it.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      b916a59a
    • J
      Btrfs: don't call free_extent_buffer twice in iterate_irefs · aefc1eb1
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      Avoid calling free_extent_buffer more than once when the iterator function
      returns non-zero. The only code that uses this is scrub repair for corrupted
      nodatasum blocks.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      aefc1eb1
    • J
      Btrfs: Make free_ipath() deal gracefully with NULL pointers · 4735fb28
      Jesper Juhl 提交于
      Make free_ipath() behave like most other freeing functions in the
      kernel and gracefully do nothing when passed a NULL pointer.
      
      Besides this making the bahaviour consistent with functions such as
      kfree(), vfree(), btrfs_free_path() etc etc, it also fixes a real NULL
      deref issue in fs/btrfs/ioctl.c::btrfs_ioctl_ino_to_path(). In that
      function we have this code:
      
      ...
              ipath = init_ipath(size, root, path);
              if (IS_ERR(ipath)) {
                      ret = PTR_ERR(ipath);
                      ipath = NULL;
                      goto out;
              }
      ...
      out:
              btrfs_free_path(path);
              free_ipath(ipath);
      ...
      
      If we ever take the true branch of that 'if' statement we'll end up
      passing a NULL pointer to free_ipath() which will subsequently
      dereference it and we'll go "Boom" :-(
      This patch will avoid that.
      Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
      4735fb28
  13. 27 3月, 2012 2 次提交
    • I
      Btrfs: fix memory leak in resolver code · 5eb56d25
      Ilya Dryomov 提交于
      init_ipath() allocates btrfs_data_container which is never freed.  Free
      it in free_ipath() and nuke the comment for init_data_container() - we
      can safely free it with kfree().
      Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
      5eb56d25
    • J
      Btrfs: fix regression in scrub path resolving · 7a3ae2f8
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      In commit 4692cf58 we introduced new backref walking code for btrfs. This
      assumes we're searching live roots, which requires a transaction context.
      While scrubbing, however, we must not join a transaction because this could
      deadlock with the commit path. Additionally, what scrub really wants to do
      is resolving a logical address in the commit root it's currently checking.
      
      This patch adds support for logical to path resolving on commit roots and
      makes scrub use that.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      7a3ae2f8
  14. 03 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 15 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: avoid positive number with ERR_PTR · 8f24b496
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      inode_ref_info() returns 1 when the element wasn't found and < 0 on error,
      just like btrfs_search_slot(). In iref_to_path() it's an error when the
      inode ref can't be found, thus we return ERR_PTR(ret) in that case. In order
      to avoid ERR_PTR(1), we now set ret to -ENOENT in that case.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      8f24b496
  16. 27 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 05 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: new backref walking code · 4692cf58
      Jan Schmidt 提交于
      The old backref iteration code could only safely be used on commit roots.
      Besides this limitation, it had bugs in finding the roots for these
      references. This commit replaces large parts of it by btrfs_find_all_roots()
      which a) really finds all roots and the correct roots, b) works correctly
      under heavy file system load, c) considers delayed refs.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
      4692cf58
  18. 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 20 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: Fix up 32/64-bit compatibility for new ioctls · 745c4d8e
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
       This patch casts to unsigned long before casting to a pointer and fixes
       the following warnings:
      fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2289:20: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
      fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2933:37: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
      fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2937:21: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
      fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3020:21: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
      fs/btrfs/scrub.c:275:4: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
      fs/btrfs/backref.c:686:27: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      745c4d8e
  20. 06 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 29 9月, 2011 1 次提交