- 09 10月, 2012 6 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
This patch adds basic support for extended inode refs. This includes support for link and unlink of the refs, which basically gets us support for rename as well. Inode creation does not need changing - extended refs are only added after the ref array is full. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Moved part of the code into a sub function and replaced most of the gotos by ifs, hoping that it will be easier to read now. Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I started hitting warnings when running xfstest 68 in a loop because there were EM's that were not lined up properly with the physical extents. This is ok, if we do something like punch a hole or write to a preallocated space or something like that we can have an EM that doesn't cover the entire physical extent. So fix the tree logging stuff to cope with this case so we don't just commit the transaction. With this patch I no longer see the warnings from the tree logging code. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Call btrfs_abort_transaction as early as possible when an error condition is detected, that way the line number reported is useful and we're not clueless anymore which error path led to the abort. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The macro btrfs_abort_transaction() can get the line number of the code where the problem happens, so we should invoke it in the place that the error occurs, or we will lose the line number. Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Btrfs uses inclusive range end for lock_extent(), unlock_extent() and related functions, so we made off-by-one errors in file clone. This fixes it and also fixes some style problems. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2012 16 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Hi, the patch si simple, but it has user visible impact and I'm not quite sure how to resolve it. In short, $subj says it, chattr -C supports it and we want to use it. The conditions that acutally allow to change the NOCOW flag are clear. What if I try to set the flag on a file that is not empty? Options: 1) whole ioctl will fail, EINVAL 2.1) ioctl will succeed, the NOCOW flag will be silently removed, but the file will stay COW-ed and checksummed 2.2) ioctl will succeed, flag will not be removed and a syslog message will warn that the COW flag has not been changed 2.2.1) dtto, no syslog message Man page of chattr states that "If it is set on a file which already has data blocks, it is undefined when the blocks assigned to the file will be fully stable." Yes, it's undefined and with current implementation it'll never happen. So from this end, the user cannot expect anything. I'm trying to find a reasonable behaviour, so that a command like 'chattr -R -aijS +C' to tweak a broad set of flags in a deep directory does not fail unnecessarily and does not pollute the log. My personal preference is 2.2.1, but my dev's oppinion is skewed, not counting the fact that I know the code and otherwise would look there before consulting the documentation. The patch implements 2.2.1. david -------------8<------------------- From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> It's safe to turn off checksums for a zero sized file. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/18030 "We cannot switch on NODATASUM for a file that already has extents that are checksummed. The invariant here is that either all the extents or none are checksummed. Theoretically it's possible to add/remove all checksums from a given file, but it's a potentially longtime operation, the file has to be in some intermediate state where the checksums partially exist but have to be ignored (for the csum->nocsum) until the file is fully converted, this brings more special cases to extent handling, it has to survive power failure and remain consistent, and probably needs to be restarted after next mount." Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I saw the warning in btrfs_drop_extent_cache where our end is less than our start while running xfstests 68 in a loop. This is because we unconditionally do drop_end = min(end, extent_end) in __btrfs_drop_extents(), even though we may not have found an extent in the range we were looking to drop. So keep track of wether or not we found something, and if we didn't just use our end. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We do not need to do anything special to freeze or unfreeze, it's all taken care of by the generic work, and what we currently have is wrong anyway since we shouldn't be returnning to userspace with mutexes held anyway. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The btree inode has it's own write cache pages so we can remove this write cache pages hook as it's not used. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We can race when checking wether PagePrivate is set on a page and we actually have an eb saved in the pages private pointer. We could have easily written out this page and released it in the time that we did the pagevec lookup and actually got around to looking at this page. So use mapping->private_lock to ensure we get a consistent view of the page->private pointer. This is inline with the alloc and releasepage paths which use private_lock when manipulating page->private. Thanks, Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave Sterba pointed out a sleeping while atomic bug while doing fsync. This is because I'm an idiot and didn't realize that rwlock's were spin locks, so we've been holding this thing while doing allocations and such which is not good. This patch fixes this by dropping the write lock before we do anything heavy and re-acquire it when it is done. We also need to take a ref on the em's in case their corresponding pages are evicted and mark them as being logged so that releasepage does not remove them and doesn't remove them from our local list. Thanks, Reported-by: NDave Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So we start our freeze, somebody comes in and does an fsync() on a file where we have to commit a transaction for whatever reason, and we will deadlock because the freeze is waiting on FS_FREEZE people to stop writing to the file system, but the transaction is waiting for its free space inodes to be written out, which are in turn waiting on sb_start_intwrite while trying to write the file extents. To fix this we'll just skip the sb_start_intwrite() if we TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK since we're being waited on by a transaction commit so we're safe wrt to freeze and this will keep us from deadlocking. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
fs_info->hashers is now an obsolete one. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
There is already an 'add free space' phrase in front of this one, we needn't to redo it. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I screwed this up, there is a race between checking if there is a running transaction and actually starting a transaction in sync where we could race with a freezer and get ourselves into trouble. To fix this we need to make a new join type to only do the try lock on the freeze stuff. If it fails we'll return EPERM and just return from sync. This fixes a hang Liu Bo reported when running xfstest 68 in a loop. Thanks, Reported-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
A subvolume cannot be deleted via rmdir, but the error code ENOTEMPTY is confusing. Return EPERM instead, as this is not permitted. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Using for_each_set_bit_from() to simplify the code. spatch with a semantic match is used to found this. (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Developing service cmds needs it. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Unnecessary lookup_extent_mapping() is removed because an error is returned to the caller. This patch was made based on the advice from Stefan Behrens, thanks. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
This patch simplifies a little complex error processing in btree_get_extent(). Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2012 18 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This reverts commit 0885ef5b After applying the above patch, the performance slowed down because the dirty page flush can only be done by one task, so revert it. The following is the test result of sysbench: Before After 24MB/s 39MB/s Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Everybody is just making stuff up, and it's just used to see if we really do need to alloc a chunk, and since we do this when we already know we really do it's just a waste of space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has historically meant that we're constantly tweaking when we should allocate a new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this patch my enospc tests run faster (didn't expect this) and more efficiently use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Kent Overstreet 提交于
For immutable bio vecs, I've been auditing and removing bi_idx references. These were harmless, but removing them will make auditing easier. scrub_bio_end_io_worker() was open coding a bio_reset() - but this doesn't appear to have been needed for anything as right after it does a bio_put(), and perusing the code it doesn't appear anything else was holding a reference to the bio. The other use end_bio_extent_readpage() was just for a pr_debug() - changed it to something that might be a bit more useful. Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> CC: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we wrote some data by compress mode into a btrfs filesystem which was full of the fragments, the kernel will report: BTRFS warning (device xxx): Aborting unused transaction. The reason is: We can not find a long enough free space to store the compressed data because of the fragmentary free space, and the compressed data can not be splited, so the kernel outputed the above message. In fact, btrfs can deal with this problem very well: it fall back to uncompressed IO, split the uncompressed data into small ones, and then store them into to the fragmentary free space. So we shouldn't output the above warning message. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Wade Cline reported a problem where he was getting garbage and warnings when writing to a preallocated range via O_DIRECT. This is because we weren't creating our normal pinned extent_map for the range we were writing to, which was causing all sorts of issues. This patch fixes the problem and makes his testcase much happier. Thanks, Reported-by: NWade Cline <clinew@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Sage reported the following lockdep backtrace ===================================== [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] 3.6.0-rc2-ceph-00171-gc7ed62d #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------- btrfs-cleaner/7607 is trying to release lock (sb_internal) at: [<ffffffffa00422ae>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by btrfs-cleaner/7607: #0: (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa003b405>] cleaner_kthread+0x95/0x120 [btrfs] stack backtrace: Pid: 7607, comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 3.6.0-rc2-ceph-00171-gc7ed62d #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa00422ae>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810afa9e>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xfe/0x110 [<ffffffff810b289e>] lock_release_non_nested+0x1ee/0x310 [<ffffffff81172f9b>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x7b/0x160 [<ffffffffa004106c>] ? put_transaction+0x8c/0x130 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00422ae>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810b2a95>] lock_release+0xd5/0x220 [<ffffffff81173071>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x151/0x160 [<ffffffff8117d9ed>] __sb_end_write+0x7d/0x90 [<ffffffffa00422ae>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81079850>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [<ffffffff81634c6b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40 [<ffffffffa0042758>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x368/0x3c0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0042808>] btrfs_end_transaction_throttle+0x18/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00318f0>] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x410/0x600 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8132babd>] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x5d/0xb0 [<ffffffffa00430ef>] btrfs_clean_old_snapshots+0xaf/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003b405>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x95/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003b419>] cleaner_kthread+0xa9/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003b370>] ? btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs.isra.102+0x220/0x220 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810791ee>] kthread+0xae/0xc0 [<ffffffff810b379d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff8163e744>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff81635430>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13 [<ffffffff81079140>] ? flush_kthread_work+0x1a0/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8163e740>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13 This is because the throttle stuff can commit the transaction, which expects to be the one stopping the intwrite stuff, but we've already done it in the __btrfs_end_transaction. Moving the sb_end_intewrite after this logic makes the lockdep go away. Thanks, Tested-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This is the change of the kernel side. Translation of logical to inode used to have an upper limit 4k on inode container's size, but the limit is not large enough for a data with a great many of refs, so when resolving logical address, we can end up with "ioctl ret=0, bytes_left=0, bytes_missing=19944, cnt=510, missed=2493" This changes to regard 64k as the upper limit and use vmalloc instead of kmalloc to get memory more easily. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We already have a helper, iterate_inodes_from_logical(), for logical resolve, so just use it. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag. It is possible to lose our errors because (-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true. I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is. I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors. Acked-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We've added a new field 'sequence' to delayed ref node, so update related tracepoints. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 liubo 提交于
As ref cache has been removed from btrfs, there is no user on its lock and its check. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we delete a inode, we will remove all the delayed items including delayed inode update, and then truncate all the relative metadata. If there is lots of metadata, we will end the current transaction, and start a new transaction to truncate the left metadata. In this way, we will leave a inode item that its link counter is > 0, and also may leave some directory index items in fs/file tree after the current transaction ends. In other words, the metadata in this fs/file tree is inconsistent. If we create a snapshot for this tree now, we will find a inode with corrupted metadata in the new snapshot, and we won't continue to drop the left metadata, because its link counter is not 0. We fix this problem by updating the inode item before the current transaction ends. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Usecase: watch 'grep btrfs < /proc/slabinfo' easy to watch all caches in one go. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I noticed I was seeing large lags when running my torrent test in a vm on my laptop. While trying to make it lag less I noticed that our overcommit math was taking into account the number of bytes we wanted to reclaim, not the number of bytes we actually wanted to allocate, which means we wouldn't overcommit as often. This patch fixes the overcommit math and makes shrink_delalloc() use that logic so that it will stop looping faster. We still have pretty high spikes of latency, but the test now takes 3 minutes less time (about 5% faster). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Mitch reported a problem where you could get an ENOSPC error when untarring a kernel git tree onto a 16gb file system with compress-force=zlib. This is because compression is a huge pain, it will return from ->writepages() without having actually created any ordered extents. To get around this we check to see if the async submit counter is up, and if it is wait until it drops to 0 before doing our normal ordered wait dance. With this patch I can now untar a kernel git tree onto a 16gb file system without getting ENOSPC errors. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We're going to use this flag EXTENT_DEFRAG to indicate which range belongs to defragment so that we can implement snapshow-aware defrag: We set the EXTENT_DEFRAG flag when dirtying the extents that need defragmented, so later on writeback thread can differentiate between normal writeback and writeback started by defragmentation. Original-Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
ulist_alloc() has the possibility of returning NULL. So, it is necessary to check the return value. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-