1. 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 24 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 02 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 09 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 05 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 01 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 26 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 19 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  10. 11 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 24 12月, 2012 3 次提交
  12. 22 11月, 2012 2 次提交
  13. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      EXYNOS: bugfix on retrieving old_index from freqs.old · 53df1ad5
      Jonghwa Lee 提交于
      The policy might have been changed since last call of target().
      Thus, using cpufreq_frequency_table_target(), which depends on
      policy to find the corresponding index from a frequency, may return
      inconsistent index for freqs.old. Thus, old_index should be
      calculated not based on the current policy.
      
      We have been observing such issue when scaling_min/max_freq were
      updated and sometimes cuased system lockups deu to incorrectly
      configured voltages.
      Signed-off-by: NMyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      53df1ad5
  14. 15 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  15. 01 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  16. 09 1月, 2012 2 次提交