- 29 5月, 2009 5 次提交
-
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The Timer64p timer has 8 compare registers that can be used to generate interrupts when the timer value matches the compare reg's value. They do not disturb the timer itself. This can be useful when there is only one timer available for both clock events and clocksource. When enabled, the clocksource remains a continuous 32-bit counter but the clock event will no longer support periodic interrupts. Instead only oneshot timers will be supported and implemented by setting the compare register to the current timer value plus the period that the clock event subsystem is requesting. Compare registers support is enabled automatically when the following conditions are met: 1) The same timer is being used for clock events and clocksource. 2) The timer is the bottom half (32 bits) of the 64-bit timer (hardware limitation). 3) The the compare register offset and irq are not zero. Since the timer is always running, there is a hardware race in timer32_config() between reading the current timer value, and adding the period to the current timer value and writing the compare register. Testing on a da830 evm board with the timer clocked at 24 MHz and the processor clocked at 300 MHz, showed the number of counter ticks to do this ranged from 20-53 (~1-2.2 usecs) but usually around 41 ticks. This includes some artifacts from collecting the information. So, the minimum period should be at least 5 usecs to be safe. There is also an non-critical lower limit that the period should be since there is no point in setting an event that is much shorter than the time it takes to set the event, and get & handle the timer interrupt for that event. There can also be all sorts of delays from activities occuring elsewhere in the system (including hardware activitis like cache & TLB management). These are virtually impossible to quantify so a minimum period of 50 usecs was chosen. That will certianly be enough to avoid the actual hardware race but hopefully not large enough to cause unreasonably course-grained timers. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
Integrate the Common Platform Interrupt Controller (cp_intc) support into the low-level irq handling for davinci and similar platforms. Do it such that support for cp_intc and the original aintc can coexist in the same kernel binary. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
Since most of the emac platform_data is really SoC specific and not board specific, move it to the SoC-specific files. Put a pointer to the platform_data in the soc_info structure so the board-specific code can set some of the platform_data if it needs to. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
Currently, there is one set of platform_device and platform_data structures for all DaVinci SoCs. The differences in the data between the various SoCs is handled by davinci_serial_init() by checking the SoC type. However, as new SoCs appear, this routine will become more & more cluttered. To clean up the routine and make it easier to add support for new SoCs, move the platform_device and platform_data structures into the SoC-specific code and use the SoC infrastructure to provide access to the data. In the process, fix a bug where the wrong irq is used for uart2 of the dm646x. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The current gpio code needs to know the number of gpio irqs there are and what the bank irq number is. To determine those values, it checks the SoC type. It also assumes that the base address and the number of irqs the interrupt controller uses is fixed. To clean up the SoC checks and make it support different base addresses and interrupt controllers, have the SoC-specific code set those values in the soc_info structure and have the gpio code reference them there. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2009 8 次提交
-
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The watchdog code currently hardcodes the base address of the timer its using. To support new SoCs, make it support timers at any address. Use the soc_info structure to do this. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The davinci timer code currently hardcodes the timer register base addresses, the timer irq numbers, and the timers to use for clock events and clocksource. This won't work for some a new SoC so put those values into the soc_info structure and set them up in the SoC-specific files. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
Use the SoC infrastructure to hold the interrupt controller information (i.e., base address, default priorities, interrupt controller type, and the number of IRQs). The interrupt controller base, although initially put in the soc_info structure's intc_base field, is eventually put in the global 'davinci_intc_base' so the low-level interrupt code can access it without a dereference. These changes enable the SoC default irq priorities to be put in the SoC-specific files, and the interrupt controller to be at any base address. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The pinmux register base and setup can be different for different SoCs so move the pinmux reg base, pinmux table (and its size) to the SoC infrastructure. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The current code to support the DaVinci Power and Sleep Controller (PSC) assumes that there is only one controller. This assumption is no longer valid so expand the support to allow greater than one PSC. To accomplish this, put the base addresses for the PSCs in the SoC infrastructure so it can be referenced by the PSC code. This also requires adding an extra parameter to davinci_psc_config() to specify the PSC that is to be enabled/disabled. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
All of the davinci SoCs need to call davinci_clk_init() so put the call in the common init routine. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The Davinci cpu_is_davinci_*() macros use the SoC part number and variant retrieved from the JTAG ID register to determine the type of cpu that the kernel is running on. Currently, the code to read the JTAG ID register assumes that the register is always at the same base address. This isn't true on some newer SoCs. To solve this, have the SoC-specific code set the JTAG ID register base address in soc_info structure and add a 'cpu_id' member to it. 'cpu_id' will be used by the cpu_is_davinci_*() macros to match the cpu id. Also move the info used to identify the cpu type into the SoC-specific code to keep all SoC-specific code together. The common code will read the JTAG ID register, search through an array of davinci_id structures to identify the cpu type. Once identified, it will set the 'cpu_id' member of the soc_info structure to the proper value and the cpu_is_davinci_*() macros will now work. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
Create a structure to encapsulate SoC-specific information. This will assist in generalizing code so it can be used by different SoCs that have similar hardware but with minor differences such as having a different base address. The idea is that the code for each SoC fills out a structure with the correct information. The board-specific code then calls the SoC init routine which in turn will call a common init routine that makes a copy of the structure, maps in I/O regions, etc. After initialization, code can get a pointer to the structure by calling davinci_get_soc_info(). Eventually, the common init routine will make a copy of all of the data pointed to by the structure so the original data can be made __init_data. That way the data for SoC's that aren't being used won't consume memory for the entire life of the kernel. The structure will be extended in subsequent patches but initially, it holds the map_desc structure for any I/O regions the SoC/board wants statically mapped. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Hilman 提交于
Rework DM644x code into SoC specific and board specific parts. This is also to generalize the structure a bit so it's easier to add support for new SoCs in the DaVinci family. Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Brownell 提交于
Declare the musb_hdrc platform device for DaVinci. Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Hilman 提交于
Add base kernel support for the TI DaVinci platform. This patch only includes interrupts, timers, CPU identification, serial support and basic power and sleep controller init. More drivers to come. Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-