Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 02 4月, 2014 9 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Rename GFX_TLB_INVALIDATE_ALWAYS · aa83e30d
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      The documentation calls this GFX_MODE bit "Flush TLB invalidate Mode".
However, that is not a good name for an enable bit as it doesn't make it
clear what is enabled. An even worse name is GFX_TLB_INVALIDATE_ALWAYS
as enabling that bit actually prevents the TLB from being invalidated at
every flush. This leads to great confusion when reading code and
proposed patches. To get around this try to bake in what is enabled by
setting the bit and call it GFX_TLB_INVALIDATE_EXPLICIT.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Gupta, Sourab" <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Acked-by: N"Gupta, Sourab" <sourab.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      aa83e30d
    • P
      drm/i915: don't get/put runtime PM at the debugfs forcewake file · c8431fda
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      Because gen6_gt_force_wake_{get,put} should already be responsible for
getting/putting runtime PM. If we keep these calls, debugfs will not
be testing the get/put calls of the forcewake functions.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c8431fda
    • P
      drm/i915: fix WARNs when reading DDI state while suspended · 882244a3
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      If runtime PM is enabled and we unset all modes, we will runtime
suspend after __intel_set_mode() , then function
intel_modeset_check_state() will try to read the HW state while it is
suspended and trigger lots of WARNs because it shouldn't be reading
registers.

So on this patch we make intel_ddi_connector_get_hw_state() return
false in case the power domain is disabled, and we also make
intel_display_power_enabled() return false in case the device is
suspended. Notice that we can't just use
intel_display_power_enabled_sw() because while the driver is being
initialized the power domain refcounts are not reflecting the real
state of the hardware.

Just for reference, I have previously published an alternate patch for
this problem, called "drm/i915: get runtime PM at intel_set_mode".

Testcase: igt/pm_pc8
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      882244a3
    • P
      drm/i915: don't read cursor registers on powered down pipes · a23dc658
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      At i915_display_info, don't call cursor_position() for a disabled
CRTC, since the CRTC may be on a powered down pipe, and this will
cause "Unclaimed register before interrupt" error messages.

Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/debugfs-read
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a23dc658
    • P
      drm/i915: get runtime PM at i915_display_info · b0e5ddf3
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      Otherwise we may get some WARNs complaining that we're reading a
register while we're suspended.

Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/debugfs-read
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b0e5ddf3
    • P
      drm/i915: don't read pp_ctrl_reg if we're suspended · efbc20ab
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      ... at edp_have_panel_vdd. Just return false, saying we don't have the
panel VDD since the device is suspended.

We started getting WARNs about this problem since the patch that
started checking if we're suspended while reading registers.

Example backtrace provided by Paulo:

[   63.572201] [drm:hsw_enable_pc8] Enabling package C8+
[   63.581831] [drm:i915_runtime_suspend] Device suspended
[   63.664798] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   63.664824] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 828 at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:47
assert_device_not_suspended.isra.7+0x32/0x40 [i915]()
[   63.664826] Device suspended
[   63.664828] Modules linked in: ccm fuse ip6table_filter ip6_tables
ebtable_nat ebtables arc4 ath9k_htc ath9k_common ath9k_hw mac80211 ath
cfg80211 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp
microcode i2c_i801 e1000e pcspkr serio_raw lpc_ich ptp pps_core mei_me
mei mfd_core dm_crypt i915 crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel
ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper drm video
[   63.664867] CPU: 3 PID: 828 Comm: kworker/3:3 Not tainted 3.14.0+ #153
[   63.664869] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Shark Bay Client
platform/WhiteTip Mountain 1, BIOS HSWLPTU1.86C.0133.R00.1309172123
09/17/2013
[   63.664887] Workqueue: events edp_panel_vdd_work [i915]
[   63.664889]  0000000000000009 ffff88009d745c28 ffffffff8167ec6f
ffff88009d745c70
[   63.664895]  ffff88009d745c60 ffffffff8106c8ed ffff880036278000
00000000000c7204
[   63.664900]  ffff88014f2d3040 ffff880036278070 0000000000000001
ffff88009d745cc0
[   63.664905] Call Trace:
[   63.664911]  [<ffffffff8167ec6f>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
[   63.664916]  [<ffffffff8106c8ed>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
[   63.664920]  [<ffffffff8106c95c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
[   63.664926]  [<ffffffff810bd6be>] ? mark_held_locks+0xae/0x130
[   63.664941]  [<ffffffffa00d80d2>]
assert_device_not_suspended.isra.7+0x32/0x40 [i915]
[   63.664956]  [<ffffffffa00d99d2>] gen6_read32+0x32/0x120 [i915]
[   63.664969]  [<ffffffffa00d99a0>] ? gen6_read8+0x120/0x120 [i915]
[   63.664985]  [<ffffffffa0106f8f>] edp_have_panel_vdd+0x3f/0x50 [i915]
[   63.665000]  [<ffffffffa01074e8>] edp_panel_vdd_off_sync+0x58/0x1c0 [i915]
[   63.665004]  [<ffffffff8108a06c>] ? process_one_work+0x18c/0x560
[   63.665018]  [<ffffffffa0107684>] edp_panel_vdd_work+0x34/0x50 [i915]
[   63.665022]  [<ffffffff8108a0d7>] process_one_work+0x1f7/0x560
[   63.665026]  [<ffffffff8108a06c>] ? process_one_work+0x18c/0x560
[   63.665031]  [<ffffffff8108ae2b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0
[   63.665035]  [<ffffffff8108ad10>] ? manage_workers.isra.21+0x2a0/0x2a0
[   63.665039]  [<ffffffff810916fc>] kthread+0xfc/0x120
[   63.665043]  [<ffffffff81091600>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x230/0x230
[   63.665048]  [<ffffffff8169082c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[   63.665052]  [<ffffffff81091600>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x230/0x230
[   63.665054] ---[ end trace 1250bcc890af9999 ]---
[   63.665060] [drm:edp_panel_vdd_off_sync] Turning eDP VDD off
[   63.665061] ------------[ cut here ]------------

Testcase: igt/pm_pc8
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      efbc20ab
    • P
      drm/i915: get runtime PM at i915_reg_read_ioctl · cf67c70f
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      To avoid WARNs when we call it.

Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/reg-read-ioctl
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75693Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      cf67c70f
    • P
      drm/i915: don't schedule force_wake_timer at gen6_read · aa0b3b5b
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      So far force_wake_timer was only used by gen6_gt_force_wake_put. Since
we always had balanced gen6_gt_force_wake_get/put calls, we could
guarantee balanced calls to intel_runtime_pm_get/put.

Commit 8232644c, "drm/i915: Convert
the forcewake worker into a timer func" started scheduling the
force_wake_timer at gen6_read, which resulted in an unbalanced
runtime_pm refcount.

So this commit just reverts to the old behavior until we can find a
proper way to used delayed force_wake from the register read/write
macros without leaving the runtime_pm refcounts unbalanced and without
runtime suspending the driver while forcewake is active.

Testcase: igt/pm_pc8/rte
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76544Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      aa0b3b5b
    • I
      drm/i915: vlv: reserve the GT power context only once during driver init · ae48434c
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      Atm we reserve/allocate and free the power context during GT power
enable/disable time. There is no need to do this, we can reserve/allocate
the buffer once during driver loading and free it during driver cleanup.
The re-reservation can also fail in case the driver previously manages to
allocate something on the given fixed address.

The buffer isn't exepected to move even if allocated by the BIOS, for
safety add an assert to check this assumption.

This also fixed a bug for Ville, where re-reserving the context failed
during a GPU reset (I assume because something else got allocated on its
fixed address).
Tested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      ae48434c
  3. 31 3月, 2014 16 次提交
  5. 30 3月, 2014 3 次提交
    • D
      Input: mousedev - fix race when creating mixed device · e4dbedc7
      由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于 
      We should not be using static variable mousedev_mix in methods that can be
called before that singleton gets assigned. While at it let's add open and
close methods to mousedev structure so that we do not need to test if we
are dealing with multiplexor or normal device and simply call appropriate
method directly.

This fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71551Reported-by: NGiulioDP <depasquale.giulio@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NGiulioDP <depasquale.giulio@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
      e4dbedc7
    • E
      Input: don't modify the id of ioctl-provided ff effect on upload failure · fc7392aa
      由 Elias Vanderstuyft 提交于 
      If a new (id == -1) ff effect was uploaded from userspace,
ff-core.c::input_ff_upload() will have assigned a positive number to the
new effect id.  Currently, evdev.c::evdev_do_ioctl() will save this new id
to userspace, regardless of whether the upload succeeded or not.

On upload failure, this can be confusing because the dev->ff->effects[]
array will not contain an element at the index of that new effect id.

This patch fixes this by leaving the id unchanged after upload fails.

Note: Unfortunately applications should still expect changed effect id for
quite some time.

This has been discussed on:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-input@vger.kernel.org/msg08513.html
("ff-core effect id handling in case of a failed effect upload")
Suggested-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NElias Vanderstuyft <elias.vds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
      fc7392aa
    • A
      rbd: drop an unsafe assertion · 638c323c
      由 Alex Elder 提交于 
      Olivier Bonvalet reported having repeated crashes due to a failed
assertion he was hitting in rbd_img_obj_callback():

    Assertion failure in rbd_img_obj_callback() at line 2165:
	rbd_assert(which >= img_request->next_completion);

With a lot of help from Olivier with reproducing the problem
we were able to determine the object and image requests had
already been completed (and often freed) at the point the
assertion failed.

There was a great deal of discussion on the ceph-devel mailing list
about this.  The problem only arose when there were two (or more)
object requests in an image request, and the problem was always
seen when the second request was being completed.

The problem is due to a race in the window between setting the
"done" flag on an object request and checking the image request's
next completion value.  When the first object request completes, it
checks to see if its successor request is marked "done", and if
so, that request is also completed.  In the process, the image
request's next_completion value is updated to reflect that both
the first and second requests are completed.  By the time the
second request is able to check the next_completion value, it
has been set to a value *greater* than its own "which" value,
which caused an assertion to fail.

Fix this problem by skipping over any completion processing
unless the completing object request is the next one expected.
Test only for inequality (not >=), and eliminate the bad
assertion.
Tested-by: NOlivier Bonvalet <ob@daevel.fr>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: NIlya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@inktank.com>
      638c323c
  7. 29 3月, 2014 12 次提交