- 12 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After relatively recent changes in the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code, the acpiphp_check_host_bridge() executed for PCI host bridges via acpi_pci_root_scan_dependent() doesn't do anything useful, because those bridges do not have hotplug contexts. That happens by mistake, so fix it by making acpiphp_enumerate_slots() add hotplug contexts to PCI host bridges too and modify acpiphp_remove_slots() to drop those contexts for host bridges as appropriate. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76901 Fixes: 2d8b1d56 (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Get rid of check_sub_bridges()) Reported-and-tested-by: NGavin Guo <gavin.guo@canonical.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Use pci_is_bridge() to simplify code. No functional change. Requires: 326c1cda PCI: Rename pci_is_bridge() to pci_has_subordinate() Requires: 1c86438c PCI: Add new pci_is_bridge() interface Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Some PCI functions used to be marked __devinit. When CONFIG_HOTPLUG was not set, these functions were discarded after boot. A few callers of these __devinit functions were marked __ref to indicate that they could safely call the __devinit functions even though the callers were not __devinit. But CONFIG_HOTPLUG and __devinit are now gone, and the need for the __ref annotations is also gone, so remove them. Relevant historical commits: 54b956b9 Remove __dev* markings from init.h a8e4b9c1 PCI: add generic pci_hp_add_bridge() 0ab2b57f PCI: fix section mismatch warning in pci_scan_child_bus 451124a7 PCI: fix 4x section mismatch warnings Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 15 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
None of these files are actually using any __init type directives and hence don't need to include <linux/init.h>. Most are just a left over from __devinit and __cpuinit removal, or simply due to code getting copied from one driver to the next. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code use pci_device_is_present() for checking if devices are present instead of open coding the same thing. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that callback if available. Also rename the existing .event() callback in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible confusion in the future. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Instead of requiring a set of special dock operations to be registered via register_hotplug_dock_device() for each ACPI dock device, it is much more straightforward to use callback pointers from the devices' hotplug contexts if available. For this reason, modify dock_hotplug_event() to use callback pointers from the hotplug contexts of ACPI devices and fall back to using the special dock operarions only if those callbacks are missing. Also make the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem set the .fixup callback pointer in the hotplug contexts of devices handled by it to a new function, acpiphp_post_dock_fixup(), so that the dock station driver can use the callbacks from those contexts instead of special dock operations registered via register_hotplug_dock_device(). Along with the above changes drop the ACPIPHP's dock operations that are not necessary any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the ACPI dock station driver to store ACPI device object pointers instead of ACPI handles in its internal data structures. The purpose is moslty to make subsequent simplifications possible, but also this allows the overall code size to be reduced slightly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order for the ACPI dock station code to be able to use the callbacks pointed to by the ACPI device objects' hotplug contexts add a .fixup() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context. That callback will be useful to handle PCI devices located in dock stations. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After recent changes adding dock station handling to the ACPI hotplug core, it is not necessary to clear the .event() pointer in the ACPIPHP device hotplug context for dock stations any more, so don't do that. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently, ACPIPHP does not add hotplug context to devices that should be handled by the native PCI hotplug (PCIeHP) code. The reason why was because PCIeHP didn't know about the devices' connections with ACPI and would not clean up things properly during an eject of an ACPI-backed device, for example. However, after recent changes that made the ACPI core create struct acpi_device objects for all namespace nodes regardless of the underlying devices' status and added PCI rescan-remove locking to both ACPIPHP and PCIeHP, that concern is not valid any more. Namely, after those changes PCIeHP need not care about the ACPI side of things any more and it should be serialized with respect to ACPIPHP and they won't be running concurrently with each other in any case. For this reason, make ACPIPHP to add its hotplug context to all devices with ACPI companions, even the ones that should be handled by PCIeHP in principle. That may work around hotplug issues on some systems where PCIeHP is supposed to work, but it doesn't and the ACPI hotplug signaling works instead. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The name of register_slot() doesn't really reflect what the function is does, so rename it to acpiphp_add_context() and add a proper kerneldoc comment to it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Replace list_for_each() + pci_bus_b() with list_for_each_entry(). Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
-
- 12 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
The ACPI specification (ACPI 5.0A, Section 6.3.7) says: _STA may return bit 0 clear (not present) with bit 3 set (device is functional). This case is used to indicate a valid device for which no device driver should be loaded (for example, a bridge device.) Children of this device may be present and valid. OSPM should continue enumeration below a device whose _STA returns this bit combination. Evidently, some BIOSes follow that and return 0x0A from _STA, which causes problems to happen when they trigger bus check or device check notifications for those devices too. Namely, ACPIPHP thinks that they are gone and may drop them, for example, if such a notification is triggered during a resume from system suspend. To fix that, modify ACPICA to regard devies as present and functioning if _STA returns both the ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED and ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING bits set for them. Reported-and-tested-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+ [rjw: Subject and changelog, minor code modifications] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_device_hotplug() assumes that ACPI handles of device objects passed to it will not become invalid while acpi_scan_lock is being held, make acpiphp_disable_slot() acquire acpi_scan_lock, because it generally causes _EJ0 to be executed for one of the devices in the slot and that may cause its ACPI handle to become invalid. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the only existing caller of acpiphp_check_host_bridge(), which is acpi_pci_root_scan_dependent(), already has a struct acpi_device pointer needed to obtain the ACPIPHP context, it doesn't make sense to execute acpi_bus_get_device() on its handle in acpiphp_handle_to_bridge() just in order to get that pointer back. For this reason, modify acpiphp_check_host_bridge() to take a struct acpi_device pointer as its argument and rearrange the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to the same function for all hotplug devices. This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler, or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler() can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing hotplug devices. However, after recent changes causing struct acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more. Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a result of a concurrent table unload). In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn(). For this reason, it's better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler. At the same time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new .hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan handlers. This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device hotplug consolidation possible. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2014 12 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since hotplug_event() can get the ACPI handle needed for debug printouts from its context argument, there's no need to pass the handle to it. Moreover, the second argument's type may be changed to (struct acpiphp_context *), because that's what is always passed to hotplug_event() as the second argument anyway. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make hotplug_event() use acpi_handle_debug() instead of an open-coded debug message printing and clean up the messages printed by it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
A few lines of code can be cut from hotplug_event() by defining and initializing the slot variable at the top of the function, so do that. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After recent PCI core changes related to the rescan/remove locking, the code sections under crit_sect mutexes from ACPIPHP slot objects are always executed under the general PCI rescan/remove lock. For this reason, the crit_sect mutexes are simply redundant, so drop them. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
acpiphp_bus_add() is only called from one place, so move the code out of it into that place and drop it. Also make that code use func_to_acpi_device() to get the struct acpi_device pointer it needs instead of calling acpi_bus_get_device() which may be costly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After recent modifications of the ACPI core making it create a struct acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device regardless of the current status of that device the ACPIPHP code can store a struct acpi_device pointer instead of an ACPI handle in struct acpiphp_context. This immediately makes it possible to avoid making potentially costly calls to acpi_bus_get_device() in two places and allows some more simplifications to be made going forward. The reason why that is correct is because ACPIPHP only installs hotify handlers for namespace nodes that exist when acpiphp_enumerate_slots() is called for their parent bridge. That only happens if the parent bridge has an ACPI companion associated with it, which means that the ACPI namespace scope in question has been scanned already at that point. That, in turn, means that struct acpi_device objects have been created for all namespace nodes in that scope and pointers to those objects can be stored directly instead of their ACPI handles. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If a struct acpi_device pointer is passed to acpiphp_no_hotplug() instead of an ACPI handle, the function won't need to call acpi_bus_get_device(), which may be costly, any more. Then, trim_stale_devices() can call acpiphp_no_hotplug() passing the struct acpi_device object it already has directly to that function. Make those changes and update slot_no_hotplug() accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If trim_stale_devices() calls acpi_bus_trim() directly, we can save a potentially costly acpi_bus_get_device() invocation. After making that change acpiphp_bus_trim() would only be called from one place, so move the code from it to that place and drop it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The err label in register_slot() is only jumped to from one place, so move the code under the label to that place and drop the label. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add proper kerneldoc comments describing acpiphp_enumerate_slots() and acpiphp_remove_slots(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After recent PCI core changes related to the rescan/remove locking, the ACPIPHP's disable_slot() function is only called under the general PCI rescan/remove lock, so it doesn't have to use dev_in_slot() any more to avoid race conditions. Make it simply walk the devices on the bus and drop the ones in the slot being disabled and drop dev_in_slot() which has no more users. Moreover, to avoid problems described in the changelog of commit 29ed1f29 (PCI: pciehp: Fix null pointer deref when hot-removing SR-IOV device), make disable_slot() carry out the list walk in reverse order. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 04 2月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If a PCI bridge with an ACPIPHP context attached is removed via sysfs, the code path executed as a result is the following: pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked pci_remove_bus pcibios_remove_bus acpi_pci_remove_bus acpiphp_remove_slots cleanup_bridge unregister_hotplug_dock_device (drops dock references to the bridge) put_bridge free_bridge acpiphp_put_context (for each child, under context lock) kfree (context) Now, if a dock event affecting one of the bridge's child devices occurs (roughly at the same time), it will lead to the following code path: acpi_dock_deferred_cb dock_notify handle_eject_request hot_remove_dock_devices dock_hotplug_event hotplug_event (dereferences context) That may lead to a kernel crash in hotplug_event() if it is executed after the last kfree() in the bridge removal code path. To prevent that from happening, add a wrapper around hotplug_event() called dock_event() and point the .handler pointer in acpiphp_dock_ops to it. Make that wrapper retrieve the device's ACPIPHP context using acpiphp_get_context() (instead of taking it from the data argument) under acpiphp_context_lock and check if the parent bridge's is_going_away flag is set. If that flag is set, it will return immediately and if it is not set it will grab a reference to the device's parent bridge before executing hotplug_event(). Then, in the above scenario, the reference to the parent bridge held by dock_event() will prevent free_bridge() from being executed for it until hotplug_event() returns. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If a PCI bridge with an ACPIPHP context attached is removed via sysfs, the code path executed as a result is the following: pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked pci_remove_bus pcibios_remove_bus acpi_pci_remove_bus acpiphp_remove_slots cleanup_bridge put_bridge free_bridge acpiphp_put_context (for each child, under context lock) kfree (child context) Now, if a hotplug notify is dispatched for one of the bridge's children and the timing is such that handle_hotplug_event() for that notify is executed while free_bridge() above is running, the get_bridge(context->func.parent) in handle_hotplug_event() will not really help, because it is too late to prevent the bridge from going away and the child's context may be freed before hotplug_event_work() scheduled from handle_hotplug_event() dereferences the pointer to it passed via the data argument. That will cause a kernel crash to happpen in hotplug_event_work(). To prevent that from happening, make handle_hotplug_event() check the is_going_away flag of the function's parent bridge (under acpiphp_context_lock) and bail out if it's set. Also, make cleanup_bridge() set the bridge's is_going_away flag under acpiphp_context_lock so that it cannot be changed between the check and the subsequent get_bridge(context->func.parent) in handle_hotplug_event(). Then, in the above scenario, handle_hotplug_event() will notice that context->func.parent->is_going_away is already set and it will exit immediately preventing the crash from happening. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpiphp_check_bridge() called by acpiphp_check_host_bridge() does things that require PCI rescan-remove locking around it, make acpiphp_check_host_bridge() use that locking. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 9217a984 (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Use global PCI rescan-remove locking) modified ACPIPHP to protect its PCI device removal and addition code paths from races against sysfs-driven rescan and remove operations with the help of PCI rescan-remove locking. However, it overlooked the fact that hotplug_event_work() is not the only caller of hotplug_event() which may also be called by dock_hotplug_event() and that code path is missing the PCI rescan-remove locking. This means that, although the PCI rescan-remove lock is held as appropriate during the handling of events originating from handle_hotplug_event(), the ACPIPHP's operations resulting from dock events may still suffer the race conditions that commit 9217a984 was supposed to eliminate. To address that problem, move the PCI rescan-remove locking from hotplug_event_work() to hotplug_event() so that it is used regardless of the way that function is invoked. Revamps: 9217a984 (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Use global PCI rescan-remove locking) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
According to the changelog of commit 29ed1f29 (PCI: pciehp: Fix null pointer deref when hot-removing SR-IOV device) it is unsafe to walk the bus->devices list of a PCI bus and remove devices from it in direct order, because that may lead to NULL pointer dereferences related to virtual functions. For this reason, change all of the bus->devices list walks in acpiphp_glue.c during which devices may be removed to be carried out in reverse order. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Multiple race conditions are possible between the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) and the generic PCI bus rescan and device removal that can be triggered via sysfs. To avoid those race conditions make the ACPIPHP code use global PCI rescan-remove locking. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 31 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The changes in the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem made during the 3.12 development cycle uncovered a problem with VGA switcheroo that on some systems, when the device-specific method (ATPX in the radeon case, _DSM in the nouveau case) is used to turn off the discrete graphics, the BIOS generates ACPI hotplug events for that device and those events cause ACPIPHP to attempt to remove the device from the system (they are events for a device that was present previously and is not present any more, so that's what should be done according to the spec). Then, the system stops functioning correctly. Since the hotplug events in question were simply silently ignored previously, the least intrusive way to address that problem is to make ACPIPHP ignore them again. For this purpose, introduce a new ACPI device flag, no_hotplug, and modify ACPIPHP to ignore hotplug events for PCI devices whose ACPI companions have that flag set. Next, make the radeon and nouveau switcheroo detection code set the no_hotplug flag for the discrete graphics' ACPI companion. Fixes: bbd34fcd (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Register all devices under the given bridge) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61891 References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64891Reported-and-tested-by: NMike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk> Reported-and-tested-by: <madcatx@atlas.cz> Reported-and-tested-by: NJoaquín Aramendía <samsagax@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
-
- 28 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() walks ACPI namenamespace under a PCI host bridge with callback register_slot(). register_slot() evaluates _ADR for all the device objects and emits a warning message for any error. Some platforms have _HID device objects (such as HPET and IPMI), which trigger unnecessary warning messages. This patch avoids emitting a warning message when a target device object does not have _ADR. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device, processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA. There are multiple reasons to do that. First of all, it avoids quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems). Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may be added to the system. It will also allow user space to evaluate _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing" devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be useful for thermal management on some systems). Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way. Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the deletion of ACPI namespace nodes. Namely, namespace nodes may be deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK. If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that callback may be stale when the callback actually runs. One way to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(), so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-