- 28 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Fleig 提交于
Fix /proc/acpi/wakeup for devices without bus or parent This patch fixes printing the wakeup status for devices without a bus or parent, such as laptop lid switches and sleep buttons. These devices have an empty physical_node_list, because acpi_bind_one is never run for them. [rjw: White space and coding style.] Signed-off-by: NAndreas Fleig <andreasfleig@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver .remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
During system resume we check if there are power resources that have been turned off by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are nonzero (they need to be turned on then). It turns out, however, that we also need to check the opposite, i.e. if there are power resources that have been turned on by the BIOS, but our reference counters for them are zero (which means that no devices are going to need them any time soon) and we should turn them off. Make the power resources resume code do the additional check and turn off the unused power resources as appropriate. This change has been tested on HP nx6325. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it is necessary to allow user space (powertop in particular) to look at the lists of power resources corresponding to different power states of devices for diagnostics and control purposes. For this reason, for each power state of an ACPI device node using power resources create a special attribute group under the device node's directory in sysfs containing links to sysfs directories representing the power resources in that list. The names of the new attribute groups are "power_resources_<state>", where <state> is the state name i.e. "D0", "D1", "D2", or "D3hot". Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 24 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for diagnostics purposes. For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power resource. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make it possible to retrieve the current power state of a device with ACPI power management from user space via sysfs by adding two new attributes, power_state and real_power_state, to the sysfs directory associated with the struct acpi_device object representing the device's ACPI node. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI core adds sysfs device files after the given devices have been registered with device_register(), which is not appropriate, because it may lead to race conditions with user space tools using those files. Fix the problem by delaying the KOBJ_ADD uevent for ACPI devices until after all of the devices' sysfs files have been created. This also fixes a use-after-free in acpi_device_unregister(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 22 1月, 2013 7 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Bader 提交于
To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on some AMD systems f594065f "ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures" introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading from AMD specific MSRs. This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass through MSR reads to the HW. Instead the guest gets a 0 in return. And this seems to cause a failure to initialize the ondemand governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states appear to run at the same frequency). While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen. Signed-off-by: NStefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> Cc: 3.7+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
When a transition to the D3cold power state is requested, acpi_device_set_power() first carries out a transition to D3hot and then turns off the device's power resources. However, it fails to update the device's power.state field appropriately and D3hot is stored in it as a result. Fix this, but make sure that the device's power state will be D3hot if its power resources cannot be turned off in the final step. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make acpi_power_state_string() return "D3cold" as the string representation of ACPI power state D3cold instead of "D3" returned currently, which is confusing. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After the only user of acpi_power_on_resources(), acpi_bus_init_power(), has been changed to avoid calling it for state equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, it doesn't have to special case that state any more. For this reason, modify the checks in acpi_power_on_resources() so that it returns -EINVAL for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD as it should. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI specitication (ACPI 5, Sections 7.2.8 - 7.2.11) requires that the _PSn (n = 0..3) method, if present, be executed after the power resources for the given device power state have been set appropriately. However, acpi_device_set_power() does that only if the new power state is going to be higher-power (lower-number) than the power state the device is in already. Otherwise, the ordering is reverse to protect against situations in which _PSn might access device registers unavailable after configuring the power resources for power state Dn (D3 meaning D3hot). Such situations are very unlikely to happen, though, and _PSn may actually be implemented with the assumption that power resources have been configured for power state Dn in advance, so change the code to follow the specification literally. This change was previously porposed in a different form by Lv Zheng. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
To reduce code duplication between acpi_device_set_power() and acpi_bus_init_power(), introduce a new helper function for executing ACPI devices' _PSn (n = 0..3) methods, acpi_dev_pm_explicit_set(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI specification requires the _PSC method to be present under a device object if its power state cannot be inferred from the states of power resources used by it (ACPI 5, Section 7.6.2). However, it also requires that (for power states D0-D2 and D3hot) if the _PSn (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) method is present under the device object, it also must be executed after the power resources have been set appropriately for the device to go into power state Dn (D3 means D3hot in this case). Thus it is not clear from the specification whether or not the _PSn method should be executed if the initial configuraion of power resources used by the device indicates power state Dn and the _PSC method is not present. The current implementation of acpi_bus_init_power() is based on the assumption that it should not be necessary to execute _PSn in the above situation, but experience shows that in fact that assumption need not be satisfied. For this reason, make acpi_bus_init_power() always execute _PSn if the initial configuration of device power resources indicates power state Dn. Reported-and-tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
It is there probably due to an accident, get rid of it so that the format is consistent across the file. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move some suspend-specific and hibernate-specific code from acpi_sleep_init() into separate functions to get rid of explicit #ifdefs in acpi_sleep_init(). Use pr_info() to start and pr_cont() to continue printing the supported ACPI sleep states line. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move ACPI device power management functions from drivers/acpi/bus.c to drivers/acpi/device_pm.c. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Lans Zhang 提交于
The bit width check was introduced by 15afae60 (ACPI, APEI: Fix incorrect APEI register bit width check and usage), and a fixup for incorrect 32-bit width memory address was given by f712c71f (ACPI, APEI: Fixup common access width firmware bug). Now there is a similar symptom: [Firmware Bug]: APEI: Invalid bit width + offset in GAR [0x12345000/64/0/3/0] Another bogus BIOS reports an incorrect 64-bit width in trigger table. Thus, apply to a similar workaround for 64-bit width memory address. Signed-off-by: NLans Zhang <jia.zhang@windriver.com> Acked-by: NGary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next invocations of it to do nothing. For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Thomas Schlichter 提交于
acpi_processor_get_power_info() has to be called before acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_states() to have the latest information available. This fixes the missing C-state information after AC-->DC transition. Signed-off-by: NThomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于
If cpuidle is disabled, that means that: per_cpu(acpi_cpuidle_device, pr->id) is set to NULL as the acpi_processor_power_init ends up failing at retval = cpuidle_register_driver(&acpi_idle_driver) (in acpi_processor_power_init) and never sets the per_cpu idle device. So when acpi_processor_hotplug on CPU online notification tries to reference said device it crashes: cpu 3 spinlock event irq 62 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000004 IP: [<ffffffff81381013>] acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx+0x3f/0x105 PGD a259b067 PUD ab38b067 PMD 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP odules linked in: dm_multipath dm_mod xen_evtchn iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi libcrc32c crc32c nouveau mxm_wmi wmi radeon ttm sg sr_mod sd_mod cdrom ata_generic ata_piix libata crc32c_intel scsi_mod atl1c i915 fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor drm_kms_helper video xen_blkfront xen_netfront fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect syscopyarea xenfs xen_privcmd mperf CPU 1 Pid: 3047, comm: bash Not tainted 3.8.0-rc3upstream-00250-g165c029 #1 MSI MS-7680/H61M-P23 (MS-7680) RIP: e030:[<ffffffff81381013>] [<ffffffff81381013>] acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_cx+0x3f/0x105 RSP: e02b:ffff88001742dca8 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000010be9 RBX: ffff8800a0a61800 RCX: ffff880105380000 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: ffff8800a0a61800 RBP: ffff88001742dce8 R08: ffffffff81812360 R09: 0000000000000200 R10: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8800a0a61800 R13: 00000000ffffff01 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffff81a907a0 FS: 00007fd6942f7700(0000) GS:ffff880105280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000004 CR3: 00000000a6773000 CR4: 0000000000042660 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process bash (pid: 3047, threadinfo ffff88001742c000, task ffff880017944000) Stack: 0000000000000150 ffff880100f59e00 ffff88001742dcd8 ffff8800a0a61800 0000000000000000 00000000ffffff01 0000000000000000 ffffffff81a907a0 ffff88001742dd18 ffffffff813815b1 ffff88001742dd08 ffffffff810ae336 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813815b1>] acpi_processor_hotplug+0x7c/0x9f [<ffffffff810ae336>] ? schedule_delayed_work_on+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff8137ee8f>] acpi_cpu_soft_notify+0x90/0xca [<ffffffff8166023d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffff810bc369>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0x10 [<ffffffff81094a4b>] __cpu_notify+0x1b/0x30 [<ffffffff81652cf7>] _cpu_up+0x103/0x14b [<ffffffff81652e18>] cpu_up+0xd9/0xec [<ffffffff8164a254>] store_online+0x94/0xd0 [<ffffffff814122fb>] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x20 [<ffffffff81216404>] sysfs_write_file+0xf4/0x170 This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2013 15 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The function returning string representations of ACPI device power states, state_string((), is now static, because it is only used internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c. However, it will be used outside of that file going forward, so rename it to acpi_power_state_string(), add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its header to acpi_bus.h. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The function used for retrieving ACPI device power states, __acpi_bus_get_power(), is now static, because it is only used internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c. However, it will be used outside of that file going forward, so rename it to acpi_device_get_power(), in analogy with acpi_device_set_power(), add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its header to acpi_bus.h. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
During power transitions into D3cold from any shallower power states we are supposed to transition the device into D3hot and remove power from it afterward, but the current code in acpi_device_set_power() doesn't work this way. At the same time, though, we need to be careful enough to preserve backwards compatibility for systems that don't distinguish between D3hot and D3cold (e.g. designed before ACPI 4). Modify acpi_device_set_power() so that it works in accordance with the expectations in both cases. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The system level attribute of ACPI power resources is the lowest system sleep level (S0, S2 etc.) in which the given resource can be "on" (ACPI 5.0, Section 7.1). On the other hand, wakeup power resources have to be "on" for devices depending on them to be able to signal wakeup. Therefore devices cannot wake up the system from sleep states higher than the minimum of the system level attributes of their wakeup power resources. Use the wakeup power resources' system level values to get the deepest system sleep state (highest system sleep level) the given device can wake up the system from. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Some ACPI power resource initialization errors, like memory allocation errors, are not taken into account appropriately in some cases, which may lead to a device having an incomplete list of power resources that one of its power states depends on, for one example. Rework the power resource initialization and namespace scanning code so that power resource initialization errors are treated more seriously. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The lists of ACPI power resources are currently extracted in two different ways, one for wakeup power resources and one for power resources that device power states depend on. There is no reason why it should be done differently in those two cases, so introduce a common routine for extracting power resources lists from data returned by AML, acpi_extract_power_resources(), and make the namespace scanning code use it for both wakeup and device power states power resources. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The local variables in acpi_bus_get_power_flags() need not be initialized upfront, so change the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
To reduce indentation level and improve code readability, move the initialization code related to device power states from acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to a new routine, acpi_bus_init_power_state(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now. Modify the power resources management code to preserve the spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for power resources used for wakeup). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI power resource objects have struct acpi_device components, but they are only used for registering those resources in the device hierarchy. In particular, power state information stored in them is completely useless (amnong other things, because the power resources "devices" are not power manageable), so there is no reason for the power resources management code to keep it up to date. Remove the code updating device power states of power resources from drivers/acpi/power.c. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI power resources driver is not very useful, because the only thing it really does is to restore the state of the power resources that were "on" before system suspend or hibernation, but that may be achieved in a different way. Drop the ACPI power resources driver entirely and add acpi_resume_power_resources() that will walk the list of all registered power resources during system resume and turn on the ones that were "on" before the preceding system suspend or hibernation. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI power resources need to be treated in a special way by the namespace scanning code, because they need to be ready to use as soon as they have been discovered (even before registering ACPI device nodes using them for power management). For this reason, it doesn't make sense to separate the preparation of struct acpi_device objects representing them in the device hierarchy from the creation of struct acpi_power_resource objects actually used for power resource manipulation. Accordingly, it doesn't make sense to define non-empty .add() and .remove() callbacks in the power resources "driver" (in fact, it is questionable whether or not it is useful to register such a "driver" at all). Rearrange the code in scan.c and power.c so that power resources are initialized entirely by one routine, acpi_add_power_resource(), that also prepares their struct acpi_device objects and registers them with the driver core, telling it to use a special release routine, acpi_release_power_resource(), for removing objects that represent power resources from memory. Make the ACPI namespace scanning code in scan.c always use acpi_add_power_resource() for preparing and registering objects that represent power resources. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Simplify the code preparing struct acpi_device objects for registration by removing useless code, moving different pieces of code into the functions they belong to and making a couple of int functions always returning 0 void. This also fixes a possible memory leak in ACPI device registration error code path by making acpi_device_register() detach data from device->handle if device_register() fails and prepares the scanning code for special-casing ACPI power resources (next patch). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on. Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0 state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices depend on what power resources. For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code from kernel subsystems using ACPI. For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage such dependencies. Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and get the device pointer again later. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make acpi_bus_trim() work in analogy with acpi_bus_scan() and carry out two passes such that ACPI drivers will be detached from device nodes being removed in the first pass and the device nodes themselves will be removed in the second pass. For this purpose split the driver unregistration out of acpi_bus_remove() into a new routine, acpi_bus_device_detach(), that will be executed by acpi_bus_trim() in the additional first pass as a post-order callback. This is necessary, because some ACPI drivers' .remove() routines unregister struct device objects associated with the ACPI device nodes being removed and that needs to happen while the ACPI device nodes are still around (for example, in case they need to be used for power management or similar things at that time). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The current acpi_bus_trim() implementation is not really straightforward and may be simplified significantly by using acpi_walk_namespace() with acpi_bus_remove() as a post-order callback. Observe that acpi_bus_remove(), as called by acpi_bus_trim(), cannot actually fail, because its first argument is guaranteed not to be NULL thanks to the acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_bus_trim(), so simply move the acpi_bus_get_device() check to acpi_bus_remove() and use acpi_walk_namespace() to execute it for every device under start->handle as a post-order callback. The, run it directly for start->handle itself. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim() to always behave as though it were 1. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-