1. 28 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 26 1月, 2013 3 次提交
  3. 24 1月, 2013 5 次提交
  4. 23 1月, 2013 8 次提交
  5. 22 1月, 2013 18 次提交
  6. 21 1月, 2013 3 次提交
    • M
      i2c: mxs: Fix misuse init_completion · 85de7fac
      Marek Vasut 提交于
      The init_completion() call does reinit not only the variable carrying
      the flag that the completion finished, but also initialized the
      waitqueue associated with the completion. On the contrary, the
      INIT_COMPLETION() call only reinits the flag.
      
      In case there was anything still stuck in the waitqueue, subsequent call
      to init_completion() would be able to create possible race condition. This
      patch uses the proper function and moves init_completion() into .probe() call
      of the driver, to be issued only once.
      
      Note that such scenario is impossible, since two threads can never enter the
      mxs_i2c_xfer_msg(), since whole this section is protected by mutex in I2C core.
      This by no means allows this issue to exit though.
      Signed-off-by: NMarek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
      Signed-off-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
      85de7fac
    • D
      ttm: on move memory failure don't leave a node dangling · 014b3440
      Dave Airlie 提交于
      if we have a move notify callback, when moving fails, we call move notify
      the opposite way around, however this ends up with *mem containing the mm_node
      from the bo, which means we double free it. This is a follow on to the previous
      fix.
      Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      014b3440
    • D
      ttm: don't destroy old mm_node on memcpy failure · 63054186
      Dave Airlie 提交于
      When we are using memcpy to move objects around, and we fail to memcpy
      due to lack of memory to populate or failure to finish the copy, we don't
      want to destroy the mm_node that has been copied into old_copy.
      
      While working on a new kms driver that uses memcpy, if I overallocated bo's
      up to the memory limits, and eviction failed, then machine would oops soon
      after due to having an active bo with an already freed drm_mm embedded in it,
      freeing it a second time didn't end well.
      Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      63054186
  7. 20 1月, 2013 2 次提交