- 01 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
After commit dfa5bb62 (cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency), this return statement is no longer needed. Reported-by: NHenrik Nilsson <Karl.Henrik.Nilsson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 31 10月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: NJesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
There are few special cases like exynos5440 which doesn't send POSTCHANGE notification from their ->target() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. From which they finally send POSTCHANGE notification. Its better if we distinguish them from other cpufreq drivers in some way so that core can handle them specially. So this patch introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such drivers. This also changes exynos5440-cpufreq.c and powernow-k8 in order to set this flag. Acked-by: NAmit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> Acked-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Fixes warnings reported by kbuild test robot sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:729:6: sparse: symbol 'copy_pid_params' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:739:6: sparse: symbol 'copy_cpu_funcs' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
The b.L switcher can be turned on/off at run time. It is therefore necessary to change the cpufreq driver behavior accordingly. The driver must be unregistered/registered with the cpufreq core to reconfigure freq tables for the virtual or actual CPUs. This is accomplished via the b.L switcher notifier callback. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This patch adds IKS (In Kernel Switcher) support to cpufreq driver. This creates a combined freq table for A7-A15 CPU pairs. A7 frequencies are virtualized and scaled down to half the actual frequencies to approximate a linear scale across the combined A7+A15 range. When the requested frequency change crosses the A7-A15 boundary a cluster switch is invoked. Based on earlier work from Sudeep KarkadaNagesha. Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
The TC2(i.e. CA15_A7) Versatile Express has external Cortex M3 based power controller which is responsible for CPU DVFS and SPC provides the interface for the same. This patch adds a tiny interface driver to check if OPPs are initialised by SPC platform code and register the arm_big_little cpufreq driver. Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 10月, 2013 7 次提交
-
-
由 viresh kumar 提交于
We have per-CPU cpu_policy_rwsem for cpufreq core, but we never use all of them. We always use rwsem of policy->cpu and so we can actually make this rwsem per policy instead. This patch does this change. With this change other tricky situations are also avoided now, like which lock to take while we are changing policy->cpu, etc. Suggested-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Add support for the Baytrail processor. Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Non-core processors have a different MSR layout to commumicate P state information. Refactor the driver to use CPU dependent accessors to P state information. Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: NJesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) functions are specific to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp.h to pm_opp.h Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) data structures are specific to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp_* data structures in OPP library with dev_pm_opp_* equivalent. Affected structures are: struct opp enum opp_event Minor checkpatch warning resulting of this change was fixed as well. Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) functions are specific to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp_* accessors in OPP library with dev_pm_opp_* equivalent. Affected functions are: opp_get_voltage opp_get_freq opp_get_opp_count opp_find_freq_exact opp_find_freq_floor opp_find_freq_ceil opp_add opp_enable opp_disable opp_get_notifier opp_init_cpufreq_table opp_free_cpufreq_table Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
cpufreq_set_policy() has been changed to origin __cpufreq_set_policy() and policy->lock has been converted to rewrite lock by commit 5a01f2. So remove the comment. Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2013 14 次提交
-
-
由 Lukasz Majewski 提交于
In the exynos4210_set_apll() function, the APLL frequency is set with direct register manipulation. Such approach is not allowed in the common clock framework. The frequency is changed, but the corresponding clock value is not updated. This causes wrong frequency read from cpufreq's cpuinfo_cur_freq sysfs attribute. Also direct manipulation with PLL's S parameter has been removed. It is already done at PLL35xx code. Tested at: - Exynos4210 - Trats board (linux 3.12-rc4) Signed-off-by: NLukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NYadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lukasz Majewski 提交于
In the exynos4x12_set_apll() function, the APLL frequency is set with direct register manipulation. Such approach is not allowed in the common clock framework. The frequency is changed, but the corresponding clock value is not updated. This causes wrong frequency read from cpufreq's cpuinfo_cur_freq sysfs attribute. Also direct manipulation with PLL's S parameter has been removed. It is already done at PLL35xx code. Tested at: - Exynos4412 - Trats2 board (linux 3.12-rc4) Signed-off-by: NLukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NTomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NYadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
The function update_policy_cpu() is expected to be called when the policy->cpu of a cpufreq policy is to be changed: ie., the new CPU nominated to become the policy->cpu is different from the old one. Print a warning if it is invoked with new_cpu == old_cpu, since such an invocation might hint at a faulty logic in the caller. Suggested-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Aaro Koskinen 提交于
Enable cpufreq on iMac G5 (iSight) model. Tested with the 2.1 GHz version. Signed-off-by: NAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Aaro Koskinen 提交于
Currently cpufreq ondemand governor cannot used on older G5 models, because the transition latency is set to CPUFREQ_ETERNAL. Provide a value based on a measurement on Xserve G5, which happens to be also the highest allowed latency. Signed-off-by: NAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Aaro Koskinen 提交于
Some functions on switch path use msleep() which is inaccurate, and depends on HZ. With HZ=100 msleep(1) takes actually over ten times longer. Using usleep_range() we get more accurate sleeps. I measured the "pfunc_slewing_done" polling to take 300us at max (on 2.3GHz dual-processor Xserve G5), so using 500us sleep there should be fine. With the patch, g5_switch_freq() duration drops from ~50ms to ~10ms on Xserve with HZ=100. Signed-off-by: NAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mark Langsdorf 提交于
Calxeda's new ECX-2000 part uses the same cpufreq interface as highbank, so add it to the driver's compatibility list. This is a minor change that can safely be applied to the 3.10 and 3.11 stable trees. Signed-off-by: NMark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Manish Badarkhe 提交于
Currently, code checks false return value from "regulator_set_voltage" to show failure message. Modify the code to check proper return value from "regulator_set_voltage". Signed-off-by: NManish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Evgeny Kapaev 提交于
As per coding style, braces {} are not necessary for single statement block Signed-off-by: NEvgeny Kapaev <orener300@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
policy->cur is now set by cpufreq core when cpufreq_driver->get() is defined and so drivers aren't required to set it. When space_id is ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO for acpi cpufreq driver it doesn't set ->get to a valid function pointer and so policy->cur is required to be set by driver. This is already followed in acpi-cpufreq driver. This patch adds a comment describing why we need to set policy->cur from driver. Suggested-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Charles Keepax 提交于
The index field of cpufreq_frequency_table has been renamed to driver_data by commit 50701588 (cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_table). This patch updates the s3c64xx driver to match. Signed-off-by: NCharles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: 3.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.11+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Currently clk_get_sys is used with cpu-cluster.<n> as the device id which is incorrect. It should be connection/consumer ID instead. It is possible to specify input clock in the cpu device node along with the optional clock-name. clk_get_sys can't handle that. This patch replaces clk_get_sys with clk_get to extend support for clocks specified in the device tree cpu node. Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jungseok Lee 提交于
This patch adds freq_attr to show a list of exynos5440 scaling available frequencies through sysfs. Common exynos driver already supports this attribute. Signed-off-by: NJungseok Lee <jays.lee@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The expression in line 398 of intel_pstate.c causes the following warning to be emitted: drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:398:3: warning: left shift count >= width of type which happens because unsigned long is 32-bit on some architectures. Fix that by using a helper u64 variable and simplify the code slightly. Tested-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 10月, 2013 11 次提交
-
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
If the system is suspended while max_perf_pct is less than 100 percent or no_turbo set policy->{min,max} will be set incorrectly with scaled values which turn the scaled values into hard limits. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61241Reported-by: NPatrick Bartels <petzicus@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. This also rearranges the code a bit to make it more sensible. Also removes some unnecessary checks. Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-