- 28 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Simple code reorganisation so we can change the logic for deciding what full constraints are more easily. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 18 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Charles Keepax 提交于
These patches add the ability to create an alternative device on which a lookup for a certain supply should be conducted. A common use-case for this would be devices that are logically represented as a collection of drivers within Linux but are are presented as a single device from device tree. It this case it is necessary for each sub device to locate their supply data on the main device. Signed-off-by: NCharles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 04 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
This helps people spot if they have missed a supply from a device tree or equivalent data structure. Suggested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 30 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Keep busy-wait looping to a minimum while waiting for a regulator to ramp-up to the target voltage. This follows the guidelines set forth in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt and assumes that regulators are never enabled in atomic context. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Ensure that the return value is always set when we return now that the logic has changed for regulator_get_optional() so we don't get missing codes leaking out. Reported-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 23 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
We should be returning an error, a repeated call will never succeed. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 21 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Now that we are defaulting to providing dummy regulators fix the logic for substituting a dummy by making the default return code -EPROBE_DEFER. Reported-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 20 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laxman Dewangan 提交于
Machine constraints is configured during regulator register. If current constraints are provided through machine constraints then it is observed that sometime the current configured on rail is out of range what machine constraint has. Set the current constraints when setting machine constraints to make sure that rail's current is within the range of given machine constraints. Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 19 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laxman Dewangan 提交于
The turn-on time of the regulator depends on the regulator device's electrical characteristics. Sometimes regulator turn-on time also depends on the capacitive load on the given platform and it can be more than the datasheet value. The driver provides the enable-time as per datasheet. Add support for configure the enable ramp time through regulator constraints so that regulator core can take this value for enable time for that regulator. Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 17 9月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
No boards have used this functionality and the new default of providing dummy regulators by default provides a better solution to the problem it was trying to solve. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
When a system has said that it has fully specified constraints for its regulators it is still possible that some supplies may be missing, especially if regulator support has been added to a driver after the board was integrated. We can handle such situations more gracefully by providing a dummy regulator. Unless the caller has specifically indicated that the system design may not include a given regulator by using regulator_get_optional() or that it needs its interactions to have an effect using regulator_get_exclusive() provide a dummy regulator if we can't locate a real one. The kconfig option REGULATOR_DUMMY that provided similar behaviour for all regulators has been removed, systems that need it should flag that they have full constraints instead. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Cut down on the size of core.c a bit more and ensure that the devres versions of things don't do too much peering inside the internals of the APIs they wrap. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
The implementation of devm_regulator_get, devm_regulator_get_exclusive and devm_regulator_get_optional are almost the same. Introduce _devm_regulator_get helper function and refactor the code. Also move devm_regulator_get_exclusive to proper place, put it after regulator_get_exclusive() function. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Sachin Kamat 提交于
Changed automaticall -> automatically. Signed-off-by: NSachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Many regulator drivers have a remove function that consists solely of calling regulator_unregister() so provide a devm_regulator_register() in order to allow this repeated code to be removed and help eliminate error handling code. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 11 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laxman Dewangan 提交于
If given rail has the single voltage (n_voltages = 1) then provide the rail voltage through regulator descriptor so that core can use this value for finding voltage. This will avoid the implementation of the callback for get_voltage() or list_voltage() callback on regulator driver. Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthias Kaehlcke 提交于
Add a resource managed regulator_get_exclusive() Signed-off-by: NMatthias Kaehlcke <matthias@kaehlcke.net> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 19 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Just for neatness. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 09 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
Move regulator_list_voltage_{linear,linear_range,table} helper functions to helpers.c. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Reduce the size of core.c a bit. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 31 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
While the majority of supplies on devices are mandatory and can't be physically omitted for electrical reasons some devices do have optional supplies and need to know if they are missing, MMC being the most common of these. Currently the core accurately reports all errors when regulators are requested since it does not know if the supply is one that must be provided even if by a regulator software does not know about or if it is one that may genuinely be disconnected. In order to allow this behaviour to be changed and stub regulators to be provided in the former case add a new regulator request function regulator_get_optional() which provides a hint to the core that the regulator may genuinely not be connected. Currently the implementation is identical to the current behaviour, future patches will add support in the core for returning stub regulators in the case where normal regulator_get() fails and the board has requested it. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Acked-by: NChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
-
- 25 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
The dev_attrs field of struct class is going away soon, dev_groups should be used instead. This converts the regulator class code to use the correct field. Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 18 7月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Clearly the testing only covered the bottom range. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
Current code does not allow fixed voltage range in multiple linear ranges. If someone does set range->uV_step == 0 in one of the linear ranges, we hit divided by zero bug. This patch fixes this issue. For fixed voltage range, return any selector means the same voltage. Thus just return 0. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
There is no need to use a normal per-CPU workqueue for delayed power downs as they're not timing or performance critical and waking up a core for them would defeat some of the point. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NLiam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Yadwinder Singh Brar 提交于
In function _regulator_do_set_voltage(), old_selector gets intialised only if (_regulator_is_enabled(rdev) && rdev->desc->ops->set_voltage_time_sel && rdev->desc->ops->get_voltage_sel)) is true. Before calling set_voltage_time_sel() we checks if (old_selector >= 0) and it will true if it got intialised properly. so we don't need to check again _regulator_is_enabled(rdev) && rdev->desc->ops->set_voltage_time_sel before calling set_voltage_time_sel(). Signed-off-by: NYadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Yadwinder Singh Brar 提交于
Some hardwares support disabling ramp delay, so adding ramp_disable flag to constraints. It will be used to figure out whether ramp_delay in constraints is explicitly set to zero or its unintialized (zero by default). And we don't need to call set_voltage_time_sel() for regulators for whom ramp delay is disabled in constraints. Signed-off-by: NYadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Many regulators have several linear ranges of selector with different step sizes, for example offering better resolution at lower voltages. Provide regulator_{map,list}_voltage_linear_range() allowing these regulators to use generic code. To do so a table of regulator_linear_range structs needs to be pointed to from the descriptor. This was inspired by similar code included in a driver submission from Chao Xie and Yi Zhang at Marvell. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 07 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Walmsley 提交于
Add regulator_get_linear_step(), which returns the voltage step size between VSEL values for linear regulators. This is intended for use by regulator consumers which build their own voltage-to-VSEL tables. Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <pwalmsley@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Chew <achew@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Longnecker <mlongnecker@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
-
- 21 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Charles Keepax 提交于
Signed-off-by: NCharles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 02 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Add a couple kernel-doc lines to get rid of kernel-doc generation warnings, no functional change. Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 18 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
A lot of regulator hardware has ascendant voltage list. This patch adds regulator_map_voltage_ascend() and export it. Drivers that have ascendant voltage list can use this as their map_voltage() operation, this is more efficient than default regulator_map_voltage_iterate() function. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
commit 6d191a5f (regulator: core: Don't defer probe if there's no DT binding for a supply) Attempted to differentiate between regulator_get() with an actual DT binding for the supply and when there is none to avoid unnecessary deferal. However, ret value supplied by regulator_dev_lookup() is being ignored by regulator_get(). So, exit with the appropriate return value. Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Bresticker 提交于
Regulator drivers may specify regulator_desc->supply_name which regulator_register() will use to find the supply node for a regulator. If no supply was specified in the device tree or the supply has yet to be registered regulator_register() will fail, deferring the probe of the regulator. In the case where no supply node was specified in the device tree, there is no supply and it is pointless to try and find one later, so go ahead and add the regulator without the supply. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxime Ripard 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
Add enable_is_inverted flag to indicate set enable_mask bits to disable when using regulator_enable_regmap and friends APIs. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Reviewed-by: NHaojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kim, Milo 提交于
The regulator_dev has regulator_enable_gpio structure. 'ena_gpio' and 'ena_gpio_invert' were moved to in regulator_enable_gpio. regulator_dev ---> regulator_enable_gpio .ena_gpio .gpio .ena_gpio_invert .ena_gpio_invert Pointer, 'ena_pin' is used for checking valid enable GPIO pin. Signed-off-by: NMilo(Woogyom) Kim <milo.kim@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
由 Kim, Milo 提交于
To support shared enable GPIO pin, replace GPIO code with new static functions Reference count: 'enable_count' Balance the reference count of each GPIO and actual pin control. The count is incremented with enabling GPIO. On the other hand, it is decremented on disabling GPIO. Actual GPIO pin is enabled at the initial use.(enable_count = 0) The pin is disabled if it is not used(shared) any more. (enable_count <=1) Regardless of the enable count, update GPIO state of the regulator. Signed-off-by: NMilo(Woogyom) Kim <milo.kim@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
由 Kim, Milo 提交于
A Regulator can be enabled by external GPIO pin. This is configurable in the regulator_config. At this moment, the GPIO can be owned by only one regulator device. In some devices, multiple regulators are enabled by shared one GPIO pin. This patch extends this limitation, enabling shared enable GPIO of regulators. New list for enable GPIO: 'regulator_ena_gpio_list' This manages enable GPIO list. New structure for supporting shared enable GPIO: 'regulator_enable_gpio' The enable count is used for balancing GPIO control count. This count is incremented when GPIO is enabled. On the other hand, it's decremented when GPIO is disabled. Reference count: 'request_count' The reference count, 'request_count' is incremented/decremented on requesting/freeing the GPIO. This count makes sure only free the GPIO when it has no users. How it works If the GPIO is already used, skip requesting new GPIO usage. The GPIO is new one, request GPIO function and add it to the list of enable GPIO. This list is used for balancing enable GPIO count and pin control. Updating a GPIO and invert code moved 'ena_gpio' and 'ena_gpio_invert' of the regulator_config were moved to new function, regulator_ena_gpio_request(). Use regulator_enable_pin structure rather than regulator_dev. Signed-off-by: NMilo(Woogyom) Kim <milo.kim@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-