Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 11月, 2011 3 次提交
  3. 07 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 28 10月, 2011 3 次提交
  9. 05 9月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 29 8月, 2011 3 次提交
  13. 27 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 08 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 05 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 04 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • L
      cpuidle: stop depending on pm_idle · a0bfa137
      由 Len Brown 提交于 
      cpuidle users should call cpuidle_call_idle() directly
rather than via (pm_idle)() function pointer.

Architecture may choose to continue using (pm_idle)(),
but cpuidle need not depend on it:

  my_arch_cpu_idle()
	...
	if(cpuidle_call_idle())
		pm_idle();

cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
cc: x86@kernel.org
Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      a0bfa137
  21. 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 24 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  25. 11 7月, 2011 14 次提交
  27. 02 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      PM / Domains: Rename struct dev_power_domain to struct dev_pm_domain · 564b905a
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The naming convention used by commit 7538e3db6e015e890825fbd9f86599b
(PM: Add support for device power domains), which introduced the
struct dev_power_domain type for representing device power domains,
evidently confuses some developers who tend to think that objects
of this type must correspond to "power domains" as defined by
hardware, which is not the case.  Namely, at the kernel level, a
struct dev_power_domain object can represent arbitrary set of devices
that are mutually dependent power management-wise and need not belong
to one hardware power domain.  To avoid that confusion, rename struct
dev_power_domain to struct dev_pm_domain and rename the related
pointers in struct device and struct pm_clk_notifier_block from
pwr_domain to pm_domain.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      564b905a
  29. 01 7月, 2011 3 次提交
    • A
      perf: Add context field to perf_event · 4dc0da86
      由 Avi Kivity 提交于 
      The perf_event overflow handler does not receive any caller-derived
argument, so many callers need to resort to looking up the perf_event
in their local data structure.  This is ugly and doesn't scale if a
single callback services many perf_events.

Fix by adding a context parameter to perf_event_create_kernel_counter()
(and derived hardware breakpoints APIs) and storing it in the perf_event.
The field can be accessed from the callback as event->overflow_handler_context.
All callers are updated.
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1309362157-6596-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      4dc0da86
    • P
      perf, arch: Add generic NODE cache events · 89d6c0b5
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Add a NODE level to the generic cache events which is used to measure
local vs remote memory accesses. Like all other cache events, an
ACCESS is HIT+MISS, if there is no way to distinguish between reads
and writes do reads only etc..

The below needs filling out for !x86 (which I filled out with
unsupported events).

I'm fairly sure ARM can leave it like that since it doesn't strike me as
an architecture that even has NUMA support. SH might have something since
it does appear to have some NUMA bits.

Sparc64, PowerPC and MIPS certainly want a good look there since they
clearly are NUMA capable.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303508226.4865.8.camel@laptopSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      89d6c0b5
    • P
      perf: Remove the nmi parameter from the swevent and overflow interface · a8b0ca17
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      The nmi parameter indicated if we could do wakeups from the current
context, if not, we would set some state and self-IPI and let the
resulting interrupt do the wakeup.

For the various event classes:

  - hardware: nmi=0; PMI is in fact an NMI or we run irq_work_run from
    the PMI-tail (ARM etc.)
  - tracepoint: nmi=0; since tracepoint could be from NMI context.
  - software: nmi=[0,1]; some, like the schedule thing cannot
    perform wakeups, and hence need 0.

As one can see, there is very little nmi=1 usage, and the down-side of
not using it is that on some platforms some software events can have a
jiffy delay in wakeup (when arch_irq_work_raise isn't implemented).

The up-side however is that we can remove the nmi parameter and save a
bunch of conditionals in fast paths.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-agjev8eu666tvknpb3iaj0fg@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      a8b0ca17
  31. 30 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  33. 29 6月, 2011 1 次提交